-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
projects: add umoci proposal #67
Conversation
Sounds reasonable to me, other than the one small comment. |
We need more maintainers, but LGTM |
Based on @dmcgowan's comments in the TOB call, I will remove this section from this proposal:
As discussed in the TOB call, we should probably have an OCI Charter amendment (and relevant discussion on process) before we have proposals that involve the archival (whether formal or not) of other OCI projects. Not to mention that we should also discuss whether the I will also add a few extra points to the FAQ to answer some of @dmcgowan's questions. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Okay, I believe this is ready for a proper vote now (it's been updated based on the TOB call discussion). I've also included @vbatts as a maintainer of the project (I will add him to the MAINTAINERS file if this proposal is accepted, as part of the transition process). /ping @opencontainers/tob LGTM from my side (obviously). I do have one question about project votes (which I'm not sure has been brought up before), but I'll put it in a separate issue (see #80). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
non voting
some suggestions for additional detail / clarification
I have included a new background question and updated the FAQ based on @mikebrow's review. Since I haven't change the text of the proposal I don't believe we need to re-start the voting, but let me know if you'd want to do that @estesp / @caniszczyk. |
I don't believe there is any reason to restart the voting. Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
prior technical issues all addressed
see nit comments..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Just a reminder that this vote closes in 6 hours or so. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM on the vote, but a few minor changes before merging the PR and moving the repository.
Simplified the governance section.
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The self vs. single lgtm resolved my concern.
@caniszczyk I think this is okay to merge now? |
it’s on my todo list for tomorrow
can you make me admin on the current repo so I can transfer it over to the
OCI org?
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 11:46 AM Aleksa Sarai ***@***.***> wrote:
@caniszczyk <https://github.com/caniszczyk> I think this is okay to merge
now?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#67 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAPSIMAOGIY7SUU62YTPLDRWT5E7ANCNFSM4KVWCTUQ>
.
--
Cheers,
Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 512 961 6719
|
Invited. I am working on updating the documentation and governance documents, and will probably merge it later today (as well as update the website). Let me know how and when you'd like to do the domain transfer for umo.ci (I only really need admin access to the DNS settings of the domain -- it's currently managed on CloudFlare). |
@cyphar repo transfer done: https://github.com/opencontainers/umoci/ Let's sync up over email on the domain transfer, can you unlock the domain and send me the auth code? also dump the zone file if you're doing more than just gh-pages |
This passes with +1 votes from: Vincent Batts (@vbatts) |
This is long-awaited "merge
umoci
into OCI" proposal, which has beendiscussed in various calls and mailing list threads since the project's
inception in 2016.
Vote Total (Closes 2020-06-12) (please make sure you also leave an LGTM comment):
/cc @opencontainers/tob @opencontainers/image-tools-maintainers @tych0
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai cyphar@cyphar.com