Use the correct way of ROCm brand in user facing content

[harshad16]

Description

Based on the comment in this JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-9452
it seems relevant to keep the user facing naming to follow the trademark name pattern.

How Has This Been Tested?

NA

Merge criteria:

• The commits are squashed in a cohesive manner and have meaningful messages.
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

[atheo89]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: atheo89

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [atheo89]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[atheo89]

/override ci/prow/images
/override ci/prow/rocm-notebooks-e2e-tests
As they don't related with the changes

[openshift-ci]

@atheo89: Overrode contexts on behalf of atheo89: ci/prow/images, ci/prow/rocm-notebooks-e2e-tests

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/images
/override ci/prow/rocm-notebooks-e2e-tests
As they don't related with the changes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.