Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(README): fix scheduling algorithm doc #16

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2019

Conversation

akhilerm
Copy link
Member

fix scheduling algorithm doc and explain how the scheduling is done currently. Also included the steps to make use of kubernetes scheduler instead of the scheduler in zfs-localpv

Signed-off-by: Akhil Mohan akhil.mohan@mayadata.io

fix scheduling algorithm doc and explain how the scheduling is
done currently. Also included the steps to make use of
kubernetes scheduler instead of the scheduler in zfs-localpv

Signed-off-by: Akhil Mohan <akhil.mohan@mayadata.io>
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #16 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #16   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.55%   89.55%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines          67       67           
=======================================
  Hits           60       60           
  Misses          7        7

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 69d72bd...0ad01f4. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@pawanpraka1 pawanpraka1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good. Thanks @akhilerm.

@pawanpraka1 pawanpraka1 merged commit 4ffd857 into openebs:master Nov 14, 2019
@kmova kmova added this to the v0.2.0 milestone Dec 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants