Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(build): support for multi arch container image #233

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 11, 2020

Conversation

prateekpandey14
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: prateekpandey14 prateek.pandey@mayadata.io

Why is this PR required? What issue does it fix?:
PR add multi arch support for zfs-localpv container images

Does this PR require any upgrade changes?:

If the changes in this PR are manually verified, list down the scenarios covered::

Any additional information for your reviewer? :
Mention if this PR is part of any design or a continuation of previous PRs

Checklist:

  • Fixes #
  • PR Title follows the convention of <type>(<scope>): <subject>
  • Has the change log section been updated?
  • Commit has unit tests
  • Commit has integration tests
  • (Optional) Are upgrade changes included in this PR? If not, mention the issue/PR to track:
  • (Optional) If documentation changes are required, which issue on https://github.com/openebs/openebs-docs is used to track them:

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 4, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #233 (b52c6c8) into master (64bc7cb) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #233   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    8.50%   8.50%           
======================================
  Files          20      20           
  Lines        1046    1046           
======================================
  Hits           89      89           
  Misses        956     956           
  Partials        1       1           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 64bc7cb...b52c6c8. Read the comment docs.

@pawanpraka1 pawanpraka1 added this to the v1.1.0 milestone Nov 4, 2020
Signed-off-by: prateekpandey14 <prateek.pandey@mayadata.io>
Makefile.buildx.mk Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@akhilerm akhilerm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a few nitpick comments and a question on the linux/arm/v7 platform.

Copy link
Member

@shubham14bajpai shubham14bajpai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Member

@akhilerm akhilerm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Copy link
Member

@akhilerm akhilerm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@prateekpandey14 A change is required for the dockerhub credential env to make it consistent across all repositories.

Signed-off-by: prateekpandey14 <prateek.pandey@mayadata.io>
Copy link
Member

@akhilerm akhilerm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kmova
Copy link
Member

kmova commented Nov 11, 2020

@prateekpandey14 - can you get travis to push the zfs-driver-amd64 image?

Signed-off-by: prateekpandey14 <prateek.pandey@mayadata.io>
@prateekpandey14
Copy link
Member Author

@prateekpandey14 - can you get travis to push the zfs-driver-amd64 image?

Done

Signed-off-by: prateekpandey14 <prateek.pandey@mayadata.io>
@kmova kmova merged commit e52d6c7 into openebs:master Nov 11, 2020
@prateekpandey14 prateekpandey14 deleted the multi-arch branch November 11, 2020 09:25
@pawanpraka1
Copy link
Contributor

@prateekpandey14 can you raise a PR for the changelog?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants