Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(zfspv): adding test cases to verify zfs property update #24

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2019

Conversation

pawanpraka1
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Pawan pawan@mayadata.io

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 10, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #24 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #24   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.33%   83.33%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines          72       72           
=======================================
  Hits           60       60           
  Misses         12       12

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1c5d656...0df5ccd. Read the comment docs.

@pawanpraka1 pawanpraka1 changed the title [WIP] test(zfspv): adding test cases to verify zfs propert update [WIP] test(zfspv): adding test cases to verify zfs property update Dec 10, 2019
Signed-off-by: Pawan <pawan@mayadata.io>
@pawanpraka1 pawanpraka1 requested a review from kmova December 11, 2019 07:07
@pawanpraka1 pawanpraka1 changed the title [WIP] test(zfspv): adding test cases to verify zfs property update test(zfspv): adding test cases to verify zfs property update Dec 11, 2019
@pawanpraka1 pawanpraka1 added this to the v0.3.0 milestone Dec 13, 2019
@kmova kmova merged commit 7547554 into openebs:master Dec 30, 2019
@pawanpraka1 pawanpraka1 deleted the prop branch December 31, 2019 06:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants