Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: REST API for create Library Collection [FC-0062] #35447

Closed

Conversation

ChrisChV
Copy link
Contributor

@ChrisChV ChrisChV commented Sep 7, 2024

Description

  • Adds a REST API view to create a new collection.

Supporting information

Testing instructions

@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, @ChrisChV!

What's next?

Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review:

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:

Who will review my changes?

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/wg-maintenance-edx-platform. Tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for review.

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Sep 7, 2024
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ openedx-calc # Library supporting mathematical calculatio
openedx-django-require
openedx-events # Open edX Events from Hooks Extension Framework (OEP-50)
openedx-filters # Open edX Filters from Hooks Extension Framework (OEP-50)
openedx-learning # Open edX Learning core (experimental)
git+https://github.com/open-craft/openedx-learning.git@jill/collection-key#egg=openedx-learning # Open edX Learning core (experimental)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO: Bump version

Copy link
Contributor

@rpenido rpenido left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is looking good @ChrisChV! Good work!

I think we already have the event for LIBRARY_COLLECTION_CREATED. Should we implement the index update as part of this task?

@@ -298,7 +298,8 @@ def rebuild_index(status_cb: Callable[[str], None] | None = None) -> None:

# Get the list of collections
status_cb("Counting collections...")
num_collections = authoring_api.get_collections().count()
collections = Collection.objects.filter(enabled=True).select_related("learning_package").order_by('pk')
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: This is also being solved here (#35321) with a different approach.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rpenido Do you think I should revert this and let #35321 sort it out?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes! I think you don't need to worry about it here. cc @pomegranited

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done: 3180f76

Comment on lines 867 to 876
try:
result = authoring_api.create_collection(
learning_package_id=library.learning_package_id,
key=key,
title=title,
description=serializer.validated_data['description'],
created_by=request.user.id,
)
except IntegrityError:
return Response(status=status.HTTP_409_CONFLICT)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As the user can't directly edit the slug, do you think it is worth an approach like this?

Suggested change
try:
result = authoring_api.create_collection(
learning_package_id=library.learning_package_id,
key=key,
title=title,
description=serializer.validated_data['description'],
created_by=request.user.id,
)
except IntegrityError:
return Response(status=status.HTTP_409_CONFLICT)
attempt = 0
result = None
while not result:
modified_key = key if attempt = 0 else key + str(attempt)
try:
result = authoring_api.create_collection(
learning_package_id=library.learning_package_id,
key=modified_key,
title=title,
description=serializer.validated_data['description'],
created_by=request.user.id,
)
except IntegrityError:
attempt += 1

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rpenido Thanks! Updated here: 44144c4

Comment on lines 266 to 267
# Rename collection.key to "slug" because "key" is a reserved prop name in React
slug = serializers.CharField(read_only=True)
Copy link
Contributor

@rpenido rpenido Sep 9, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we plan to change it in the model?
Also, this is not being returned from the rest call.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That wasn't my plan. I've already updated the code to return the slug in the response: 817e3b4

@mphilbrick211 mphilbrick211 added the FC Relates to an Axim Funded Contribution project label Sep 9, 2024
@ChrisChV
Copy link
Contributor Author

ChrisChV commented Sep 9, 2024

I think we already have the event for LIBRARY_COLLECTION_CREATED. Should we implement the index update as part of this task?

@rpenido I added it here: b7378ab

@ChrisChV
Copy link
Contributor Author

ChrisChV commented Sep 10, 2024

@rpenido I just noticed that this API is being implemented here. I'm going to use that branch to avoid any conflicts.

@ChrisChV
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closed in flavor of open-craft#683

@ChrisChV ChrisChV closed this Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
FC Relates to an Axim Funded Contribution project open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants