You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is the first, of I'm sure will be many issues for parameter types that are simply non-existent in the parm@Frosst universe. We would like to get more complete coverage in the force field first then may follow-up later with QM calculations.
Single sulfur phosphorous bonds are not in the parm@Frosst universe.
Here are the relevant bonds I was able to find in GAFF2
p2 30.97 1.538 Phosphate with two connected atoms
p3 30.97 1.538 Phosphate with three connected atoms, such as PH3
p4 30.97 1.538 Phosphate with three connected atoms, such as O=P(CH3)2
p5 30.97 1.538 Phosphate with four connected atoms, such as O=P(OH)3
pe 30.97 1.538 Inner Sp2 P in conjugated systems
pf 30.97 1.538 Inner Sp2 P in conjugated systems, identical to pe
px 30.97 1.538 Special p4 in conjugated systems
py 30.97 1.538 Special p5 in conjugated systems
Relevant sulfur types
s2 32.06 2.900 S with two connected atom, involved at least one double bond
s4 32.06 2.900 S with three connected atoms
s6 32.06 2.900 S with four connected atoms
sh 32.06 2.900 Sp3 S connected with hydrogen
ss 32.06 2.900 Sp3 S in thio-ester and thio-ether
sx 32.06 2.900 Special s4 in conjugated systems
sy 32.06 2.900 Special s6 in conjugated systems
The *x and *y types seem to be fairly specialized so I suggest we use
k = 150
r = 2.1
for now with the SMIRKS [#15:1]-[#16:2] and the "rough estimate from GAFF2 by CCB on [date]"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I totally agree with this, @bannanc and I agree with your estimates; they seem reasonable given the GAFF values and, since this is to maximize coverage with as few parameters as possible, this looks like a good starting point. More specialization can come later when/if the data drives it.
Please start a document indicating prioritized chemistry to look at this summer. Obviously this should be one such region of chemical space.
bannanc
changed the title
S-P bonds (not in parm@Frosst)
S-P bonds (not in parm99/parm@Frosst)
Mar 16, 2017
This is the first, of I'm sure will be many issues for parameter types that are simply non-existent in the parm@Frosst universe. We would like to get more complete coverage in the force field first then may follow-up later with QM calculations.
Single sulfur phosphorous bonds are not in the parm@Frosst universe.
Here are the relevant bonds I was able to find in GAFF2
Relevant phosphorous types
Relevant sulfur types
The
*x
and*y
types seem to be fairly specialized so I suggest we usek = 150
r = 2.1
for now with the SMIRKS [#15:1]-[#16:2] and the "rough estimate from GAFF2 by CCB on [date]"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: