-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8299847: RISC-V: Improve PrintOptoAssembly output of CMoveI/L nodes #11919
Conversation
👋 Welcome back fyang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@RealFYang The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks okay, but shouldn't CMove instructions be pipe_class_compare
?
@RealFYang This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Yes, I agree that is better since we are doing comare and branch here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still good.
Thanks all for the review. |
Going to push as commit 859ccd1.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@RealFYang Pushed as commit 859ccd1. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Witnessed some incorrect/strange branch condition code in PrintOptoAssembly output on RISC-V which is quite misleading. While this won't affect release build, we should fix this for debug build. This also fixes the pipeline for those nodes and bumps the BRANCH_COST a little bit as I think control transfer instructions should have higher cost than regular integer computational instructions.
With this fix, we have some new PrintOptoAssembly output like following snippet:
Testing: Tier1 tested on HiFive Unmatched board.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11919/head:pull/11919
$ git checkout pull/11919
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/11919
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11919/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 11919
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 11919
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11919.diff