Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8309427: [riscv-port-jdk17u] Remove unused RoundDoubleModeV C2 node #68

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zifeihan
Copy link
Member

@zifeihan zifeihan commented Jun 5, 2023

Hi, here we want to remove the RoundDoubleModeV node that is not being used, we found that the reason the RoundDoubleModeV node is not called in RISC-V is that the PopulateIndex node needs to be added to enable SuperWord optimization (an algorithm for automatic vectorization). In addition to this, the node RoundDoubleMode needs to be implemented in its scalar form, which is not implemented in riscv.ad. But there is no floating point to floating point instruction in riscv that does not change the width by, so what we need to do here may simply be to remove the RoundDoubleModeV node. refer: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8298342

Testing:

Tier1-3 passed without new failure on unmacthed (release).


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8309427: [riscv-port-jdk17u] Remove unused RoundDoubleModeV C2 node (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/riscv-port-jdk17u.git pull/68/head:pull/68
$ git checkout pull/68

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/68
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/riscv-port-jdk17u.git pull/68/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 68

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 68

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/riscv-port-jdk17u/pull/68.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 5, 2023

👋 Welcome back gcao! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into riscv-port will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 5, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 5, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@RealFYang RealFYang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. And I want to add that the assembly code for this node is not correct in using the rounding mode.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 8, 2023

@zifeihan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8309427: [riscv-port-jdk17u] Remove unused RoundDoubleModeV C2 node

Reviewed-by: fyang

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the riscv-port branch:

  • 0c31ef4: 8308997: RISC-V: Sign extend when comparing 32-bit value with zero instead of testing the sign bit

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the riscv-port branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@RealFYang) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 8, 2023
@zifeihan
Copy link
Member Author

zifeihan commented Jun 9, 2023

@RealFYang Thanks for the review.
/integrate

@RealFYang
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jun 9, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 9, 2023

@zifeihan
Your change (at version 139961c) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 9, 2023

Going to push as commit 2b22d28.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the riscv-port branch:

  • 0c31ef4: 8308997: RISC-V: Sign extend when comparing 32-bit value with zero instead of testing the sign bit

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 9, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 9, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Jun 9, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 9, 2023

@RealFYang @zifeihan Pushed as commit 2b22d28.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@zifeihan zifeihan deleted the JDK-8309427 branch February 28, 2024 05:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants