[PRE REVIEW]: medrxivr: Accessing and searching medRxiv and bioRxiv preprint data in R

[whedon]

Submitting author: @mcguinlu (Luke A McGuinness)
Repository: https://github.com/ropensci/medrxivr
Version: v0.0.3
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewers: @danielskatz
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mcguinlu. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mcguinlu if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.22541/au.158516578.89167184 is OK
- 10.1136/bmj.l2301 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.14 s (244.9 files/s, 15396.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               18            169            252            633
Markdown                         5             76              0            212
YAML                             6             45              9            167
Rmd                              4            173            274            100
TeX                              1              4              0             24
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            34            467            535           1136
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '2647' was gathered on 2020/09/08.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.

[whedon]

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

[danielskatz]

@whedon query scope

[whedon]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[mcguinlu]

This package has been reviewed by rOpenSci: ropensci/software-review#380<https://github.com/ropensci/software-review/issues/380#issue-comment-box> @ropensci/editors

…

________________________________ From: whedon <notifications@github.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 3:01:59 PM To: openjournals/joss-reviews <joss-reviews@noreply.github.com> Cc: Luke McGuinness <luke.mcguinness@bristol.ac.uk>; Mention <mention@noreply.github.com> Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: medrxivr: Accessing and searching medRxiv and bioRxiv preprint data in R (#2647) Submission flagged for editorial review. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#2647 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJ2LHGP2C3OVTWZRTMW4G2LSEY2NPANCNFSM4Q76WV2A>.

[danielskatz]

Ok, thanks - that's important to know, as it changes the path forward

[danielskatz]

@whedon assign @danielskatz as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @danielskatz

[danielskatz]

@whedon assign @danielskatz as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @danielskatz is now a reviewer

[danielskatz]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #2651.