[PRE REVIEW]: electiondata: a Python package for consolidating, checking, analyzing, visualizing and exporting election results

[whedon]

Submitting author: @sfsinger19103 (Stephanie Singer)
Repository: https://github.com/ElectionDataAnalysis/electiondata
Version: v2.0.0
Editor: @ajstewartlang
Reviewers: @vaneseltine, @andrewheiss
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/27e248fc1e46488384e884dc242aac80"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/27e248fc1e46488384e884dc242aac80/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/27e248fc1e46488384e884dc242aac80/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/27e248fc1e46488384e884dc242aac80)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @sfsinger19103. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @lorenanicole.

@sfsinger19103 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

PDF failed to compile for issue #3688 with the following error:

 Can't find any papers to compile :-(

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon generate pdf from branch joss-submission

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss-submission. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon check repository

[kyleniemeyer]

@openjournals/dev any idea why whedon is stalling on the repository check?

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon invite @ajstewartlang as editor

Hi @ajstewartlang, would you be interested in editing this submission for us?

[whedon]

@ajstewartlang has been invited to edit this submission.

[sfsinger19103]

zen-juen
peanutfun

hknd23

cjbarrie

vaneseltine

vinodkahuja

[arfon]

@whedon check repository

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=64.99 s (8.2 files/s, 1150.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XML                              2              0              2          38058
Python                          19           1385           3961          24655
INI                            504             84              0           5769
Markdown                         5            236              0            632
JSON                             1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           531           1705           3963          69115
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '160bf67000b12fdf17f4195d' was
gathered on 2021/09/05.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Bryan Loy                       10           963             45            0.36
Eric Tsai                      383         30013          10090           14.22
Jon Wolgamott                   51          6517           5328            4.20
Nick Hershman                    5           485            126            0.22
Raghu                           15           340            169            0.18
Raghu Srungavarapu              17           848            109            0.34
Raghu-Srungavarapu               4           311              0            0.11
Stephanie Frank Sing             2            62            237            0.11
Stephanie Singer              1625        105358          73830           63.52
Todd Graham                     12          1320             25            0.48
ekmeyerson                      22           933             35            0.34
raghu-srungavarapu-b             2             6              1            0.00
sfsinger19103                  518         29534          15419           15.93
wonderbug2020                    2             3              1            0.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Eric Tsai                 10202           34.0          9.3                1.45
Raghu                        12            3.5         13.2               16.67
Raghu-Srungavarapu            1            0.3          8.4              100.00
Stephanie Singer          19778           18.8          2.9                6.20
sfsinger19103                 8            0.0         10.2                0.00

[ajstewartlang]

@whedon assign me as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @ajstewartlang

[ajstewartlang]

@whedon assign @vaneseltine as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @vaneseltine is now a reviewer

[ajstewartlang]

@whedon add @andrewheiss as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @andrewheiss is now a reviewer

[ajstewartlang]

Many thanks @vaneseltine and @andrewheiss for agreeing to review this submission - it's very much appreciated - I'll start the review now...

[ajstewartlang]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #3739.