[PRE REVIEW]: chessboard: An R package for creating network connections based on chess moves

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @ahasverus (Nicolas Casajus)
Repository: https://github.com/FRBCesab/chessboard
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main
Version: 0.1
Editor: @Nikoleta-v3
Reviewers: @Pentaonia, @gsapijaszko
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f709edaff050ed0cb1ffb8dd4ad2a1bb"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f709edaff050ed0cb1ffb8dd4ad2a1bb/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f709edaff050ed0cb1ffb8dd4ad2a1bb/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f709edaff050ed0cb1ffb8dd4ad2a1bb)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ahasverus. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@ahasverus if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.04 s (2410.8 files/s, 297305.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               84           2375           1917           5148
Markdown                         6            206              0            709
Rmd                              4            531            718            588
YAML                             7             42             24            235
TeX                              1              8              0             78
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           102           3162           2659           6758
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1199

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/s11749-018-0599-x is OK
- 10.32614/RJ-2018-009 is OK
- 10.1038/s41559-017-0101 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- 0.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.015 is INVALID

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[danielskatz]

👋 @ahasverus - thanks for your submission. One of your DOIs seems to be missing a leading "1". Please feel free to make this change in your .bib file, then use the command @editorialbot check references to check again, and the command @editorialbot generate pdf when the references are right to make a new PDF. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.

I'll look for an editor for your submission next.

[danielskatz]

👋 @Bisaloo - do you think you could edit this submission?

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot invite @Bisaloo as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[ahasverus]

👋 @danielskatz
Thanks for your feedback. I have updated the DOI.

@editorialbot check references

[danielskatz]

... editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment. ...

[ahasverus]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/s11749-018-0599-x is OK
- 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.015 is OK
- 10.32614/RJ-2018-009 is OK
- 10.1038/s41559-017-0101 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[ahasverus]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[danielskatz]

👋 @Bisaloo - just a ping re #5656 (comment) ...

[Bisaloo]

Hi, thanks for the invite. I'll be on annual leave over the next month and prefer not taking any assignment that will inevitably be delayed as a result. I'll update my availability on the editor dashboard to reflect this.

[danielskatz]

@Nikoleta-v3 - would you be able to edit this submission?

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot invite @Nikoleta-v3 as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[Nikoleta-v3]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @Nikoleta-v3 is now the editor

[Nikoleta-v3]

Hey 👋🏻 @ahasverus, could you have a look at this list of people and suggest a few potential reviewers for your submission?

[ahasverus]

Hi 👋 @Nikoleta-v3,

Here is a list of potential reviewers: @wcjochem, @GisKid, @Pentaonia, @ssujit.

[Nikoleta-v3]

👋🏻 @GisKid, @Pentaonia, @ssujit would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "chessboard: An R package for creating network connections based on chess moves". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue 🆙

Please let me know if you're available 😄 Thank you!

[Pentaonia]

Hey @Nikoleta-v3 and @ahasverus,

as described in my profile, I am currently finishing my Master's degree. So I don't have much experience in reviewing. This would be my first review for this journal.

The topic is quite interesting, as I have been teaching about spatial statistics in the last semester and how to apply methods that use these kinds of networks!
However, if my level of experience is enough for you, I would be happy to join, help and learn!

All the best
Louis

[Nikoleta-v3]

Hey @Pentaonia 👋🏻, thank you for replying.

I see no issue with you being an MSc student! In my experience, first-time reviewers always provide very detailed reviews. And in case you have any issues with the review, you can always ping me, and I can potentially be of help.

[Nikoleta-v3]

👋🏻 @jedalong and @gsapijaszko would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "chessboard: An R package for creating network connections based on chess moves". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue 🆙

Please let me know if you're available 😄 Thank you!

[Pentaonia]

Hey @Nikoleta-v3,

perfect, then I will start as soon as possible.

So when I start, can I just put the checklist (here) in a new comment of mine and tick off the list items or comment below when I am done or have found something?

[jedalong]

i can't take this on at the moment sorry.

[gsapijaszko]

👋🏻 @jedalong and @gsapijaszko would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?
[...]
Please let me know if you're available 😄 Thank you!

Yes, let's try :).

Regards,
Grzegorz

[Nikoleta-v3]

Hey @Pentaonia 👋🏻

So when I start, can I just put the checklist (here) in a new comment of mine and tick off the list items or comment below when I am done or have found something?

Correct! Just no here, as not on this issue. This is the pr- review issue. I am going to start the review issue now since we have two reviewers!

[Nikoleta-v3]

Thank you for your reply @jedalong 🙏🏻 and thank you @gsapijaszko for agreeing to review the submission! 🎉

[Nikoleta-v3]

@editorialbot add @Pentaonia as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@Pentaonia added to the reviewers list!

[Nikoleta-v3]

@editorialbot add @gsapijaszko as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@gsapijaszko added to the reviewers list!

[Nikoleta-v3]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5753.