[PRE REVIEW]: VoteKit: A Python package for computational social choice research #7088

editorialbot · 2024-08-08T10:50:11Z

Submitting author: @cdonnay (Moon Duchin)
Repository: https://github.com/mggg/votekit
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): JOSS
Version: v2.0.1
Editor: @britta-wstnr
Reviewers: @tuvavbardal, @FATelarico, @andrewheiss
Managing EiC: Samuel Forbes

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bb1226313881241bcd98c30e55d4df48"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bb1226313881241bcd98c30e55d4df48/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bb1226313881241bcd98c30e55d4df48/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bb1226313881241bcd98c30e55d4df48)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @cdonnay. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@cdonnay if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

editorialbot · 2024-08-08T10:50:13Z

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot · 2024-08-08T10:50:31Z

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=1.59 s (61.7 files/s, 549181.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON                             2              0              0         692798
CSV                             25              7              0         160391
Python                          40           1778           2159           6070
reStructuredText                 9            964           1427           1286
Jupyter Notebook                 5              0           3033            526
Markdown                         4            133              0            468
TeX                              1             65              0            330
YAML                             4              9             28             82
TOML                             2              6              0             44
CSS                              2              4              0             35
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
JavaScript                       1              2              0             15
make                             1              4              7              9
Bourne Shell                     1              1              0              2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            98           2981           6655         862082
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   199	Jack Gibson
   174	Chris Donnay
    77	Jennifer Wang
    30	bmacias01
    27	James Turk
    21	gabeschoenbach
    20	ziglaser
    15	Zach Glaser
    10	mduchin
     9	cdonnay
     9	roryhe
     4	gkehne
     4	peterrrock2
     3	Peter
     1	Malavika Mukundan
     1	MalavikaMukundan

editorialbot · 2024-08-08T10:50:35Z

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 2202

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot · 2024-08-08T10:50:38Z

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot · 2024-08-08T10:50:39Z

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf. Author (Christopher Donnay) is missing affiliation.

editorialbot · 2024-08-08T10:50:51Z

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.21105/joss.04880 is OK
- 10.24963/ijcai.2022/15 is OK
- 10.1257/jep.9.1.27 is OK
- 10.1007/s11127-016-0328-5 is OK
- 10.1007/s00355-011-0603-9 is OK
- 10.2139/ssrn.3778021 is OK
- 10.1023/A:1024221816507 is OK
- 10.1109/ICCV.1998.710701 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: VoteKit
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PrefLib-Tools
- No DOI given, and none found for title: pref_voting
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Votelib
- No DOI given, and none found for title: apportionment
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Scottish STV Election Repo
- No DOI given, and none found for title: COMSOC Community Site
- 10.24963/ijcai.2024/881 may be a valid DOI for title: Guide to Numerical Experiments on Elections in Com...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: RCV Cruncher
- 10.24963/ijcai.2024/881 may be a valid DOI for title: Guide to Numerical Experiments on Elections in Com...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Drawing a Map of Elections in the Space of Statist...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Comparing Electoral Systems for the Massachusetts ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Analysis of Election Systems for Washington State
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Analysis of Election Systems for the Chelan County...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Study of Reform Proposals for Chicago City Council
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Findings on the City of Lowell’s Election Systems
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Analysis of Election Systems for Oregon State
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Analysis of Election Systems for the Tukwila, WA S...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Ranked Choice Voting and Proportional Representati...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Proportionality for ranked voting, in theory and p...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Learning blocs and slates from observed elections
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Modeling the Fair Representation Act
- 10.2307/2960485 may be a valid DOI for title: Deterministic and Probabilistic Voting Models
- 10.1007/s42001-024-00249-8 may be a valid DOI for title: A Comparison of Sequential Ranked-Choice Voting an...
- 10.1007/978-94-009-4225-7 may be a valid DOI for title: The Theory of Committees and Elections
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Source of Election Results: An Empirical Analy...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Structure of the Election-Generating Universe
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Electoral system design: The new international IDE...
- 10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10611 may be a valid DOI for title: Proportional justified representation
- 10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9324 may be a valid DOI for title: Justified representation in approval-based committ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Proportional rankings
- 10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10612 may be a valid DOI for title: What do multiwinner voting rules do? An experiment...

INVALID DOIs

- None

samhforbes · 2024-08-08T11:10:47Z

@cdonnay I will begin looking for an editor for this submission, but in the meantime if you don't mind, you can see an error generating the pdf, as well as (less urgently) some missing DOIs in the references.

cdonnay · 2024-08-08T13:52:30Z

Will do!

There is a similar paper in submission that we think compliments ours very well: #7020

Perhaps some of the editors from that would be appropriate for us as well.

mduchin · 2024-08-10T19:26:42Z

@samhforbes I think we fixed the affiliations, and the DOIs as much as possible. (Many of the references are to white papers that do not have DOIs....) Could you let us know if it looks ok?

samhforbes · 2024-08-11T09:20:02Z

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot · 2024-08-11T09:21:29Z

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

editorialbot · 2024-08-11T09:22:13Z

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

PyEI: A Python package for ecological inference
Submitting author: @karink520
Handling editor: @drvinceknight (Active)
Reviewers: @matt-graham, @pmyteh
Similarity score: 0.7171

IDCeMPy: Python Package for Inflated Discrete Choice Models
Submitting author: @hknd23
Handling editor: @galessiorob (Active)
Reviewers: @cmaimone, @jungtaekkim, @tmickleydoyle
Similarity score: 0.6887

electiondata: a Python package for consolidating, checking, analyzing, visualizing and exporting election results
Submitting author: @sfsinger19103
Handling editor: @ajstewartlang (Active)
Reviewers: @vaneseltine, @andrewheiss
Similarity score: 0.6687

Multiple Inference: A Python package for comparing multiple parameters
Submitting author: @dsbowen
Handling editor: @vissarion (Active)
Reviewers: @blakeaw, @mattpitkin, @nhejazi
Similarity score: 0.6686

simstudy: Illuminating research methods through data generation
Submitting author: @assignUser
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @gagolews, @brunaw
Similarity score: 0.6540

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

britta-wstnr · 2024-08-20T08:41:57Z

@editorialbot assign @britta-wstnr as editor

editorialbot · 2024-08-20T08:42:00Z

Assigned! @britta-wstnr is now the editor

britta-wstnr · 2024-08-20T08:43:34Z

Hi @cdonnay 👋
I'll be editing your paper. I'll be back shortly with more information 🙂

britta-wstnr · 2024-08-22T07:26:12Z

@editorialbot check references

britta-wstnr · 2024-08-22T07:26:20Z

@editorialbot generate paper

editorialbot · 2024-08-22T07:26:23Z

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

britta-wstnr · 2024-08-22T07:26:51Z

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot · 2024-08-22T07:26:55Z

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.21105/joss.04880 is OK
- 10.24963/ijcai.2024/881 is OK
- 10.24963/ijcai.2022/15 is OK
- 10.2139/ssrn.3778021 is OK
- 10.1257/jep.9.1.27 is OK
- 10.2307/2960485 is OK
- 10.1007/s11127-016-0328-5 is OK
- 10.1007/s00355-011-0603-9 is OK
- 10.1007/s42001-024-00249-8 is OK
- 10.1007/978-94-009-4225-7 is OK
- 10.2139/ssrn.3778021 is OK
- 10.1023/A:1024221816507 is OK
- 10.1109/ICCV.1998.710701 is OK
- 10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10611 is OK
- 10.1007/s00355-016-1019-3 is OK
- 10.24963/ijcai.2017/58 is OK
- 10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10612 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: VoteKit
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PrefLib-Tools
- No DOI given, and none found for title: pref_voting
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Votelib
- No DOI given, and none found for title: apportionment
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Scottish STV Election Repo
- No DOI given, and none found for title: COMSOC Community Site
- No DOI given, and none found for title: RCV Cruncher
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Comparing Electoral Systems for the Massachusetts ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Analysis of Election Systems for Washington
 State
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Analysis of Election Systems for the Chelan
 Count...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Study of Reform Proposals
 for Chicago City Counci...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Findings on the City of Lowell’s Election
 Systems
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Analysis of Election Systems for Oregon State
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Analysis of Election Systems for the Tukwila,
 WA ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Proportionality for ranked voting, in theory and p...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Learning blocs and slates from observed elections
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Modeling the Fair Representation Act
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Source of Election Results: An Empirical Analy...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Structure of the Election-Generating Universe
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Electoral system design: The new international IDE...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.24963/ijcai.2024/881 may be a valid DOI for title: Guide to Numerical Experiments on Elections in Com...

❌ INVALID DOIs

- 10.5555/3398761.3398916 is INVALID - 10.5555 is a known broken prefix, replace with https://dl.acm.org/doi/{doi} in the {url} field

editorialbot · 2024-08-22T07:28:09Z

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

editorialbot · 2024-08-22T07:28:53Z

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

PyEI: A Python package for ecological inference
Submitting author: @karink520
Handling editor: @drvinceknight (Active)
Reviewers: @matt-graham, @pmyteh
Similarity score: 0.7173

IDCeMPy: Python Package for Inflated Discrete Choice Models
Submitting author: @hknd23
Handling editor: @galessiorob (Active)
Reviewers: @cmaimone, @jungtaekkim, @tmickleydoyle
Similarity score: 0.6905

Multiple Inference: A Python package for comparing multiple parameters
Submitting author: @dsbowen
Handling editor: @vissarion (Active)
Reviewers: @blakeaw, @mattpitkin, @nhejazi
Similarity score: 0.6718

electiondata: a Python package for consolidating, checking, analyzing, visualizing and exporting election results
Submitting author: @sfsinger19103
Handling editor: @ajstewartlang (Active)
Reviewers: @vaneseltine, @andrewheiss
Similarity score: 0.6661

simstudy: Illuminating research methods through data generation
Submitting author: @assignUser
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @gagolews, @brunaw
Similarity score: 0.6562

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

britta-wstnr · 2024-08-23T11:08:05Z

Hello @cdonnay 👋
Before inviting reviewers, I have a couple of points for you to address 👷 🙂

You can see that our Editorial Bot now flags a few DOIs as faulty (missing or invalid), see this comment. Can you have a look and see if they're fixable?
Reading your paper, I saw that it is pretty long. Please note that our word limit is around 1000 words. Can you have a look if the paper can be shortened? See here for an overview of what should be included in your paper (although I think you adhere to this pretty well). Maybe you could move some of the information to your documentation?
If you have any concerns about this, please let me know!

Thanks a lot! 🙏

britta-wstnr · 2024-09-03T07:08:53Z

Gentle ping @cdonnay 👋

editorialbot · 2024-09-03T14:54:03Z

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

PyEI: A Python package for ecological inference
Submitting author: @karink520
Handling editor: @drvinceknight (Active)
Reviewers: @matt-graham, @pmyteh
Similarity score: 0.7183

IDCeMPy: Python Package for Inflated Discrete Choice Models
Submitting author: @hknd23
Handling editor: @galessiorob (Active)
Reviewers: @cmaimone, @jungtaekkim, @tmickleydoyle
Similarity score: 0.6897

Multiple Inference: A Python package for comparing multiple parameters
Submitting author: @dsbowen
Handling editor: @vissarion (Active)
Reviewers: @blakeaw, @mattpitkin, @nhejazi
Similarity score: 0.6708

electiondata: a Python package for consolidating, checking, analyzing, visualizing and exporting election results
Submitting author: @sfsinger19103
Handling editor: @ajstewartlang (Active)
Reviewers: @vaneseltine, @andrewheiss
Similarity score: 0.6704

simstudy: Illuminating research methods through data generation
Submitting author: @assignUser
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @gagolews, @brunaw
Similarity score: 0.6542

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

cdonnay · 2024-09-03T14:56:24Z

Hi @britta-wstnr.

For length, we are thinking of cutting the last two sections: 1) Area of need: resources for research and 2) projects. Do you think that would be appropriate?

We have edited the suggested doi and the invalid doi, but the rest of the articles have no DOI.

britta-wstnr · 2024-09-06T13:25:14Z

Hi @cdonnay,

from my point of view, mentioning projects that use your software is quite useful, it's also in our paper guidelines. Maybe you can list them a little more concisely.
I think you could save some text by making some of your examples (both theoretic and code/figure examples) a little less verbose. You could for example consider moving the details to your documentation and referring there. But I am also curious what @samhforbes thinks about this!

Just as a note because I happened to come across this right now: in the last paper link you generated above, some references appear as ?, e.g. in footnote 4 on page 2 and in line 119.

samhforbes · 2024-09-06T13:36:26Z

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot · 2024-09-06T13:37:39Z

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

editorialbot · 2024-09-06T13:38:23Z

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

PyEI: A Python package for ecological inference
Submitting author: @karink520
Handling editor: @drvinceknight (Active)
Reviewers: @matt-graham, @pmyteh
Similarity score: 0.7172

IDCeMPy: Python Package for Inflated Discrete Choice Models
Submitting author: @hknd23
Handling editor: @galessiorob (Active)
Reviewers: @cmaimone, @jungtaekkim, @tmickleydoyle
Similarity score: 0.6884

Multiple Inference: A Python package for comparing multiple parameters
Submitting author: @dsbowen
Handling editor: @vissarion (Active)
Reviewers: @blakeaw, @mattpitkin, @nhejazi
Similarity score: 0.6698

electiondata: a Python package for consolidating, checking, analyzing, visualizing and exporting election results
Submitting author: @sfsinger19103
Handling editor: @ajstewartlang (Active)
Reviewers: @vaneseltine, @andrewheiss
Similarity score: 0.6684

simstudy: Illuminating research methods through data generation
Submitting author: @assignUser
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @gagolews, @brunaw
Similarity score: 0.6534

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

samhforbes · 2024-09-06T13:41:12Z

Hi @cdonnay I'd agree with @britta-wstnr here - I think it's useful and even recommended to have some examples of current use.
It's obviously your paper, but if it were me I'd look to economise on each of the areas of need sections in particular. I think they could certainly go somewhere in software documentation, but the details you provide in this paper don't need to be full ones.

cdonnay · 2024-09-09T20:16:11Z

Great we'll give that a go and post here when we feel it's been shortened.

cdonnay · 2024-09-23T13:21:49Z

Howdy! We have shortened our draft as much as we feel comfortable; how does it look on your end?

britta-wstnr · 2024-09-23T13:53:42Z

Hey @cdonnay! Great to hear - I will have a look soon!

britta-wstnr · 2024-09-27T16:25:49Z

@editorialbot generate pdf

britta-wstnr · 2024-09-27T16:25:58Z

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot · 2024-09-27T16:26:39Z

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.21105/joss.04880 is OK
- 10.24963/ijcai.2024/881 is OK
- 10.24963/ijcai.2022/15 is OK
- 10.2139/ssrn.3778021 is OK
- 10.1257/jep.9.1.27 is OK
- 10.2307/2960485 is OK
- 10.1007/s11127-016-0328-5 is OK
- 10.1007/s00355-011-0603-9 is OK
- 10.1007/s42001-024-00249-8 is OK
- 10.1007/978-94-009-4225-7 is OK
- 10.2139/ssrn.3778021 is OK
- 10.1023/A:1024221816507 is OK
- 10.1109/ICCV.1998.710701 is OK
- 10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10611 is OK
- 10.1007/s00355-016-1019-3 is OK
- 10.24963/ijcai.2017/58 is OK
- 10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10612 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: VoteKit
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PrefLib-Tools
- No DOI given, and none found for title: pref_voting
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Votelib
- No DOI given, and none found for title: apportionment
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Scottish STV Election Repo
- No DOI given, and none found for title: COMSOC Community Site
- No DOI given, and none found for title: RCV Cruncher
- https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3398761.3398916 - non-DOI with 10.5555 correctly placed in the url field, editor should ensure this resolves
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Comparing Electoral Systems for the Massachusetts ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Analysis of Election Systems for Washington
 State
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Analysis of Election Systems for the Chelan
 Count...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Study of Reform Proposals
 for Chicago City Counci...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Findings on the City of Lowell’s Election
 Systems
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Analysis of Election Systems for Oregon State
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Analysis of Election Systems for the Tukwila,
 WA ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Proportionality for ranked voting, in theory and p...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Learning blocs and slates from observed elections
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Modeling the Fair Representation Act
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Source of Election Results: An Empirical Analy...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Structure of the Election-Generating Universe
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Electoral system design: The new international IDE...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

editorialbot · 2024-09-27T16:27:14Z

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

editorialbot · 2024-09-27T16:27:59Z

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

PyEI: A Python package for ecological inference
Submitting author: @karink520
Handling editor: @drvinceknight (Active)
Reviewers: @matt-graham, @pmyteh
Similarity score: 0.7387

electiondata: a Python package for consolidating, checking, analyzing, visualizing and exporting election results
Submitting author: @sfsinger19103
Handling editor: @ajstewartlang (Active)
Reviewers: @vaneseltine, @andrewheiss
Similarity score: 0.7261

IDCeMPy: Python Package for Inflated Discrete Choice Models
Submitting author: @hknd23
Handling editor: @galessiorob (Active)
Reviewers: @cmaimone, @jungtaekkim, @tmickleydoyle
Similarity score: 0.6987

Multiple Inference: A Python package for comparing multiple parameters
Submitting author: @dsbowen
Handling editor: @vissarion (Active)
Reviewers: @blakeaw, @mattpitkin, @nhejazi
Similarity score: 0.6809

bwsample: Processing Best-Worst Scaling data
Submitting author: @ulf1
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @ejhigson, @jakryd
Similarity score: 0.6779

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

britta-wstnr · 2024-10-02T12:30:18Z

Hey @cdonnay - paper looks good now! Thanks for shortening it considerably.
I will go ahead and start inviting reviewers now - are there any reviewers you would suggest? That would help a lot - if you want to suggest reviewers, please do so without @-ing them. See this comment from the editorial 🤖 for more information on suggesting reviewers.

cdonnay · 2024-10-02T13:27:14Z

Here are a few suggestions:
Markus Brill, Jeanne Clelland, and David McCune.

James Turk (who is a JOSS reviewer), Daryl DeFord, and Thomas Weighill are also possibilities, although they have at some point in the past may have been involved with what would become the code base, and we aren't sure if that excludes them.

britta-wstnr · 2024-10-18T14:45:53Z

Hi @cdonnay - thanks a lot for the suggestions! Sorry also for my slow reply, I was sick for a while.
By now, I already invited a few reviewers - will keep you updated if they agree to review.

britta-wstnr · 2024-10-21T15:17:15Z

@andrewheiss has kindly agreed to review - thanks, @andrewheiss! 🙏
The review process will start once a sufficient number of reviewers is found - and you will be pinged again 🙂

britta-wstnr · 2024-10-30T13:26:26Z

@FATelarico has also kindly agreed to review - thank you, @FATelarico! 🙏
I am still awaiting the reaction of some other potential reviewers I've contacted - I will ping you again once we get started 🙂

britta-wstnr · 2024-11-07T16:25:39Z

@tuvavbardal has also kindly agreed to review - thank you, @tuvavbardal! 🙏

With that we have a sufficient number of reviewers and can move on to the reviewing stage! 🎉
The review will happen in a new Github issue. I'll open the new thread ASAP. You'll all be pinged again there and there will be instructions how to move on.

britta-wstnr · 2024-11-13T15:50:51Z

@editorialbot add @tuvavbardal as reviewer

editorialbot · 2024-11-13T15:50:54Z

@tuvavbardal added to the reviewers list!

britta-wstnr · 2024-11-13T15:51:13Z

@editorialbot add @FATelarico as reviewer

editorialbot · 2024-11-13T15:51:16Z

@FATelarico added to the reviewers list!

britta-wstnr · 2024-11-13T15:51:52Z

@editorialbot add @andrewheiss as reviewer

editorialbot · 2024-11-13T15:51:55Z

@andrewheiss added to the reviewers list!

britta-wstnr · 2024-11-13T15:52:07Z

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot · 2024-11-13T15:52:12Z

OK, I've started the review over in #7477.

editorialbot added pre-review Track: 4 (SBCS) Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Sciences labels Aug 8, 2024

editorialbot added Python TeX Shell labels Aug 8, 2024

editorialbot assigned britta-wstnr Aug 20, 2024

editorialbot closed this as completed Nov 13, 2024

[PRE REVIEW]: VoteKit: A Python package for computational social choice research #7088

[PRE REVIEW]: VoteKit: A Python package for computational social choice research #7088

Comments

editorialbot commented Aug 8, 2024 • edited Loading

Status

editorialbot commented Aug 8, 2024

editorialbot commented Aug 8, 2024

editorialbot commented Aug 8, 2024

editorialbot commented Aug 8, 2024

editorialbot commented Aug 8, 2024

editorialbot commented Aug 8, 2024

samhforbes commented Aug 8, 2024

cdonnay commented Aug 8, 2024

mduchin commented Aug 10, 2024

samhforbes commented Aug 11, 2024

editorialbot commented Aug 11, 2024

editorialbot commented Aug 11, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Aug 20, 2024

editorialbot commented Aug 20, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Aug 20, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Aug 22, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Aug 22, 2024

editorialbot commented Aug 22, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Aug 22, 2024

editorialbot commented Aug 22, 2024

editorialbot commented Aug 22, 2024

editorialbot commented Aug 22, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Aug 23, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Sep 3, 2024

editorialbot commented Sep 3, 2024

cdonnay commented Sep 3, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Sep 6, 2024 • edited Loading

samhforbes commented Sep 6, 2024

editorialbot commented Sep 6, 2024

editorialbot commented Sep 6, 2024

samhforbes commented Sep 6, 2024

cdonnay commented Sep 9, 2024

cdonnay commented Sep 23, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Sep 23, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Sep 27, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Sep 27, 2024

editorialbot commented Sep 27, 2024

editorialbot commented Sep 27, 2024

editorialbot commented Sep 27, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Oct 2, 2024

cdonnay commented Oct 2, 2024 • edited Loading

britta-wstnr commented Oct 18, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Oct 21, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Oct 30, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Nov 7, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Nov 13, 2024

editorialbot commented Nov 13, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Nov 13, 2024

editorialbot commented Nov 13, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Nov 13, 2024

editorialbot commented Nov 13, 2024

britta-wstnr commented Nov 13, 2024

editorialbot commented Nov 13, 2024

editorialbot commented Aug 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

britta-wstnr commented Sep 6, 2024 •

edited

Loading

cdonnay commented Oct 2, 2024 •

edited

Loading