-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 152
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revisit Emeritus Stage Definitions #1185
Comments
Worth looking at the Sunsetting Checklist on that same page too. |
Happy to help move this forward @bensternthal |
Tagging the notes from today's call here @bensternthal (so that I can keep them handy for next time) https://docs.google.com/document/d/1u2DbBRwOGdWLdV9wqM_X583xdR7XwgvklzYh9Yx03OE/edit?usp=sharing |
Here is the WIP doc we'd like to review with the CPC. Once we get through some rounds of editing in Google we can create a PR to refine the content further. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HcKsUgw7EMSMueaNcl_VCC5tOJl8uF4aOW3dZpbpgjA/edit |
This is great work! So glad to see this progressing like this.
…--tobie
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 9:07 PM Benjamin Sternthal ***@***.***> wrote:
Here is the WIP doc we'd like to review with the CPC. Once we get through
some rounds of editing in Google we can create a PR to refine the content
further.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HcKsUgw7EMSMueaNcl_VCC5tOJl8uF4aOW3dZpbpgjA/edit
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1185 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAA2QAHSMTNEHJSP2UMBGDYY5CRHAVCNFSM6AAAAAA5RSVNXKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAMBUHA2TGMZXG4>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***
com>
|
Looks great overall! Although I notice under archival:
i don't notice anything similar under EOL. For example, I would assume that one possibility in both cases would be linking to long-term support providers when applicable? |
The Sovereign Tech Fund infrastructure project includes supporting sunsetting/emeritus projects.
As we look to audit our projects to see which (if any) might be emeritus, it's a good time to revisit the current definition and see if we want to make any changes.
From my perspective, I am hoping we could get a more precise definition of "active development" and the process for nominating and voting on a potential emeritus project. I think we should also look at the sunsetting checklist (per Tobie's suggestion) and think about any additional or changes to the infrastructure piece.
A potential example can be seen here. Specifically section 2.3.5:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: