Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Proposal] Add proposal for path and queryParams support in Rollouts #1524

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
132 changes: 132 additions & 0 deletions docs/proposals/20240315-pathandqueryparams.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
---
title: Add Path and QueryParams support to trafficRoutings
authors:
- "@lujiajing1126"
reviewers:
- "@YYY"
creation-date: 2024-03-15
last-updated: 2024-05-15
status: implementable
---

# Add Path and QueryParams support to trafficRoutings

Support Path and QueryParams as HttpMatch conditions.

## Table of Contents

- [Add Path and QueryParams support to trafficRoutings](#add-path-and-queryparams-support-to-trafficroutings)
- [Table of Contents](#table-of-contents)
- [Motivation](#motivation)
- [Goals](#goals)
- [Non-Goals/Future Work](#non-goalsfuture-work)
- [Proposal](#proposal)
- [User Stories](#user-stories)
- [Implementation Details/Notes/Constraints](#implementation-detailsnotesconstraints)
- [MSE Ingress](#mse-ingress)
- [Gateway API](#gateway-api)
- [Additional Details](#additional-details)
- [Test Plan [optional]](#test-plan-optional)
- [Implementation History](#implementation-history)

## Motivation

So far, OpenKruise Rollouts simply supports `Header` as the matchers for traffic routing. Path and QueryParams are also commonly used for traffic routing in A/B testing scenarios,

- Path can be used for A/B testing at API/RPC level,
- QueryParams can be used in A/B testing for HTMLs and other cases where Header is not under control

### Goals

- Support Path and/or QueryParams for Gateway API, Istio Mesh and Ingress (Specifically, MSE and Gateway API)

### Non-Goals/Future Work

- `SourceLabels` and `SourceNamespace` are also commonly used, but only applicable to interservice communication. It can be left in the future.

## Proposal

The following fields are necessary in the `HttpRouteMatch` struct,

| FieldName | Type | Description |
| --------- | ---- | ----------- |
| Path | *gatewayv1beta1.HTTPPathMatch | Path specifies a HTTP request path matcher. |
| QueryParams | []gatewayv1beta1.HTTPQueryParamMatch | QueryParams specifies HTTP query parameter matchers. Multiple match values are ANDed together, meaning, a request must match all the specified query parameters to select the route. |

```go
type HttpRouteMatch struct {
// New

// Path specifies a HTTP request path matcher.
// Supported list:
// - Istio: https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/networking/virtual-service/#HTTPMatchRequest
// - GatewayAPI: If path is defined, the whole HttpRouteMatch will be used as a standalone matcher
//
// +optional
Path *gatewayv1beta1.HTTPPathMatch `json:"path,omitempty"`

// Headers specifies HTTP request header matchers. Multiple match values are
// ANDed together, meaning, a request must match all the specified headers
// to select the route.
//
// +listType=map
// +listMapKey=name
// +optional
// +kubebuilder:validation:MaxItems=16
Headers []gatewayv1beta1.HTTPHeaderMatch `json:"headers,omitempty"`

// Existing
// QueryParams specifies HTTP query parameter matchers. Multiple match
// values are ANDed together, meaning, a request must match all the
// specified query parameters to select the route.
// Supported list:
// - Istio: https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/networking/virtual-service/#HTTPMatchRequest
// - MSE Ingress: https://help.aliyun.com/zh/ack/ack-managed-and-ack-dedicated/user-guide/annotations-supported-by-mse-ingress-gateways-1
// Header/Cookie > QueryParams
// - Gateway API
//
// +listType=map
// +listMapKey=name
// +optional
// +kubebuilder:validation:MaxItems=16
QueryParams []gatewayv1beta1.HTTPQueryParamMatch `json:"queryParams,omitempty"`
}
```

`Matches` defines conditions used to match incoming HTTP requests to the canary service. Each match condition may contain several criteria as children which are independent of each other.

Only one of the `weight` and `matches` will come into effect. If both fields are configured, then `matches` takes precedence.

### User Stories

Currently, only one trafficRouting provider is supported. Then we may consider them case by case,

- MSE Ingress: User can define queryParams together with headers. But due to priority of MSE ingress itself, Headers & QueryParams > Cookie > Weight.
- Istio: User can define path and/or queryParams and use without any issue.
- Gateway API: User can define path, headers and/or queryParams. But path follows a special rule which will be described in details below.

### Implementation Details/Notes/Constraints

#### MSE Ingress

According to the documentation of [MSE Ingress](https://help.aliyun.com/zh/ack/ack-managed-and-ack-dedicated/user-guide/advanced-usage-of-mse-ingress?spm=a2c4g.11186623.0.0.58a26dc4q4GCmn#p-qar-ac2-lvw), if Header and Query Parameter are combined, both conditions MUST be fulfilled.

#### Gateway API

Considering the Gateway API, all `HttpRouteMatch`es defined in the `matches` field will be applied to the existing rules from the Gateway API one by one if path is not used.
For example, M `HttpRouteMatch`es (without `Path`) with N `HTTPRouteRule`s will generate M x N (Cartesian product) `HTTPRouteRule`s to the canary service.

If path is defined in the `HttpRouteMatch`, the whole `HttpRouteMatch` will be directly mapped as a `HTTPRouteRule` in the Gateway API to avoid potential path conflict.

## Additional Details

### Test Plan [optional]

## Implementation History

- [ ] MM/DD/YYYY: Proposed idea in an issue or [community meeting]
- [ ] MM/DD/YYYY: Compile a Google Doc following the CAEP template (link here)
- [ ] MM/DD/YYYY: First round of feedback from community
- [ ] MM/DD/YYYY: Present proposal at a [community meeting]
- [ ] MM/DD/YYYY: Open proposal PR

Loading