Allowing to pass additional options to the geotiff.js source #13290
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
geotiff.js source
ahocevar
reviewed
Jan 25, 2022
|
📦 Preview the examples and docs from this branch here: https://deploy-preview-13290--ol-site.netlify.app/. |
geotiff.js sources
ahocevar
reviewed
Jan 26, 2022
Co-authored-by: Andreas Hocevar <andreas.hocevar@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Andreas Hocevar <andreas.hocevar@gmail.com>
|
Would anybody object if we just added an This would mean you would have to repeat options share among multiple sources. But it would also mean you could have separate options for each of that were ever needed. I can prepare a pull request if it sounds ok. |
This was referenced Feb 27, 2022
1 task
1 task
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #13289