docs(usage): link to gallery and removed TODO text #954
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
scratchmex
changed the title
|
Thanks! One clarification, we think the "advanced topics" section can be removed altogether as the "todo list" is now in the Github issue tracker. I noticed that the "filter and explore datasets" link under the "Datasets" header on the page is broken. Could you link to the "examples/30_extended/datasets_tutorial.html" dataset example from there? If you could make those two changes the page will be all up to date and I'd be happy to merge 👍 |
|
What about now? |
|
Looks good 🎉 Thank you for the contribution! |
PGijsbers
approved these changes
Oct 2, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reference Issue
Fixes #952.
What does this PR implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Link to gallery and removed the TODO tag from non-written tutorials
How should this PR be tested?
--
Any other comments?