Fix Flaky CloseIndexIT.testCloseWhileDeletingIndices

[sarthakaggarwal97]

Description

The test was errorring out due to timeout.

java.lang.AssertionError: Unexpected exception: ProcessClusterEventTimeoutException[failed to process cluster event (add-block-index-to-close [[vquumsvuoq/KiZV1g8bRsWoscd3K-G7Tg]]) within 30s]

Increased the timeout to 60s. 5000 iterations passed locally.

Screenshot of 1000 iterations passing:

Related Issues

Resolves #11610

Check List

• New functionality includes testing.
  • All tests pass
• New functionality has been documented.
  • New functionality has javadoc added
• Failing checks are inspected and point to the corresponding known issue(s) (See: Troubleshooting Failing Builds)
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff
• Commit changes are listed out in CHANGELOG.md file (See: Changelog)
• Public documentation issue/PR created

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[github-actions]

Compatibility status:

Checks if related components are compatible with change d41c3d6

Incompatible components

Incompatible components: [https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer-rca.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/cross-cluster-replication.git]

Skipped components

Compatible components

Compatible components: [https://github.com/opensearch-project/asynchronous-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/security-analytics.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/observability.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/reporting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-oci-object-storage.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/job-scheduler.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/custom-codecs.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/k-nn.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/common-utils.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/notifications.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/neural-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/anomaly-detection.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/index-management.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/ml-commons.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/geospatial.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/alerting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/sql.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/security.git]

[github-actions]

❌ Gradle check result for 85c7dfb: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

[github-actions]

❕ Gradle check result for d41c3d6: UNSTABLE

• TEST FAILURES:

      1 org.opensearch.remotestore.RemoteIndexPrimaryRelocationIT.testPrimaryRelocationWhileIndexing

Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (92afd67) 71.40% compared to head (d41c3d6) 71.37%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #12049      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     71.40%   71.37%   -0.04%     
+ Complexity    59465    59434      -31     
============================================
  Files          4925     4925              
  Lines        279471   279471              
  Branches      40635    40635              
============================================
- Hits         199558   199472      -86     
- Misses        63298    63396      +98     
+ Partials      16615    16603      -12     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[andrross]

Increased the timeout to 60s. 5000 iterations passed locally.

@sarthakaggarwal97 Could you reliably reproduce this error within 5000 iterations in your local testing before increasing the timeout?

[sarthakaggarwal97]

@andrross, yes able to reproduce it currently in the 5000 iterations without the fix. Attaching screenshot for reference.