Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Segment gc timestamp pinned enabled #15435

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Segment gc timestamp pinned enabled #15435

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

sachinpkale
Copy link
Member

Description

  • This is to check integ test status post enabling pinned timestamp feature.

Related Issues

Resolves #[Issue number to be closed when this PR is merged]

Check List

  • Functionality includes testing.
  • API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Sachin Kale added 5 commits August 26, 2024 21:47
Add support to skip pinned timestamp in remote segment garbage collector
11c5d89 
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kale <kalsac@amazon.com>
Change tests to use pinned timestamp enable/disable setting
8406a9c 
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kale <kalsac@amazon.com>
Add separate test class for remote segment directory with pinned time…
b2d204d 
…stamps

Signed-off-by: Sachin Kale <kalsac@amazon.com>
Enable pinned timestamp randomly for integ tests
2dc9852 
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kale <kalsac@amazon.com>
Check integ test status by enabling pinned timestamps
1637f0f 
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kale <kalsac@amazon.com>
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 1637f0f: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@opensearch-ci-bot opensearch-ci-bot mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@anasalkouz anasalkouz Awaiting requested review from anasalkouz anasalkouz will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review anasalkouz is a code owner

@andrross andrross Awaiting requested review from andrross andrross will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review andrross is a code owner

@ashking94 ashking94 Awaiting requested review from ashking94 ashking94 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review ashking94 is a code owner

@Bukhtawar Bukhtawar Awaiting requested review from Bukhtawar Bukhtawar will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review Bukhtawar is a code owner

@CEHENKLE CEHENKLE Awaiting requested review from CEHENKLE CEHENKLE will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review CEHENKLE is a code owner

@dblock dblock Awaiting requested review from dblock dblock will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review dblock is a code owner

@dbwiddis dbwiddis Awaiting requested review from dbwiddis dbwiddis will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review dbwiddis is a code owner

@gbbafna gbbafna Awaiting requested review from gbbafna gbbafna will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review gbbafna is a code owner

@jed326 jed326 Awaiting requested review from jed326 jed326 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review jed326 is a code owner

@kotwanikunal kotwanikunal Awaiting requested review from kotwanikunal kotwanikunal will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review kotwanikunal is a code owner

@mch2 mch2 Awaiting requested review from mch2 mch2 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review mch2 is a code owner

@msfroh msfroh Awaiting requested review from msfroh msfroh will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review msfroh is a code owner

@nknize nknize Awaiting requested review from nknize nknize will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review nknize is a code owner

@owaiskazi19 owaiskazi19 Awaiting requested review from owaiskazi19 owaiskazi19 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review owaiskazi19 is a code owner

@reta reta Awaiting requested review from reta reta will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review reta is a code owner

@Rishikesh1159 Rishikesh1159 Awaiting requested review from Rishikesh1159 Rishikesh1159 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review Rishikesh1159 is a code owner

@saratvemulapalli saratvemulapalli Awaiting requested review from saratvemulapalli saratvemulapalli will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review saratvemulapalli is a code owner

@shwetathareja shwetathareja Awaiting requested review from shwetathareja shwetathareja will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review shwetathareja is a code owner

@sohami sohami Awaiting requested review from sohami sohami will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review sohami is a code owner

@VachaShah VachaShah Awaiting requested review from VachaShah VachaShah will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review VachaShah is a code owner

@jainankitk jainankitk Awaiting requested review from jainankitk jainankitk will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review jainankitk is a code owner

@linuxpi linuxpi Awaiting requested review from linuxpi linuxpi will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review linuxpi is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@sachinpkale