Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.x] New algorithm for resolving action groups #4472

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2024

Conversation

opensearch-trigger-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport 20291a9 from #4448.

Signed-off-by: Nils Bandener <nils.bandener@eliatra.com>
(cherry picked from commit 20291a9)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 82.75862% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 65.43%. Comparing base (5984477) to head (34cc23e).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              2.x    #4472      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.37%   65.43%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         311      312       +1     
  Lines       21866    21888      +22     
  Branches     3550     3553       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits        14294    14322      +28     
+ Misses       5804     5799       -5     
+ Partials     1768     1767       -1     
Files Coverage Δ
...ecurityconf/impl/SecurityDynamicConfiguration.java 80.30% <100.00%> (+0.77%) ⬆️
...pensearch/security/securityconf/ConfigModelV7.java 67.30% <80.00%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
...h/security/securityconf/FlattenedActionGroups.java 81.25% <81.25%> (ø)

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

@cwperks cwperks merged commit 428e21a into 2.x Jun 18, 2024
88 checks passed
@cwperks cwperks deleted the backport/backport-4448-to-2.x branch June 18, 2024 18:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants