ART-11251: [4.19][konflux] update vendor to RedHat, Inc.

[ashwindasr]

Fixes

 - metadata:
      code: labels.required_labels
    msg: 'The "vendor" label has an unexpected "Red Hat" value. Must be one of: Red
      Hat, Inc.' - metadata:
      code: labels.required_labels
    msg: 'The "vendor" label has an unexpected "Red Hat" value. Must be one of: Red
      Hat, Inc.'

As Joep commented here, since the label is coming from the ELS image, we don't need to override the value, which was already correct

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ashwindasr: This pull request references ART-11251 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Fixes

- metadata:
     code: labels.required_labels
   msg: 'The "vendor" label has an unexpected "Red Hat" value. Must be one of: Red
     Hat, Inc.' - metadata:
     code: labels.required_labels
   msg: 'The "vendor" label has an unexpected "Red Hat" value. Must be one of: Red
     Hat, Inc.'

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[ashwindasr]

/unhold

Tested, EC error was resolved.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ashwindasr: This pull request references ART-11251 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Fixes

- metadata:
     code: labels.required_labels
   msg: 'The "vendor" label has an unexpected "Red Hat" value. Must be one of: Red
     Hat, Inc.' - metadata:
     code: labels.required_labels
   msg: 'The "vendor" label has an unexpected "Red Hat" value. Must be one of: Red
     Hat, Inc.'

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from ashwindasr. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from ashwindasr. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[joepvd]

Think the vendor label is coming from the els image. Let's not override it if we can. Meaning, let's drop this config rather than correct it :)

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ashwindasr: This pull request references ART-11251 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Fixes

- metadata:
     code: labels.required_labels
   msg: 'The "vendor" label has an unexpected "Red Hat" value. Must be one of: Red
     Hat, Inc.' - metadata:
     code: labels.required_labels
   msg: 'The "vendor" label has an unexpected "Red Hat" value. Must be one of: Red
     Hat, Inc.'

As Joep commented here, since the label is coming from the ELS image, we don't need to override the value, which was already correct

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[joepvd]

/lgtm

[ashwindasr]

Tested worked