Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

manifests: reorganize to match infra operator convention #186

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sjenning
Copy link
Contributor

@sjenning sjenning commented Apr 23, 2020

Most of this is a noop. Just reorganizing to look like other operators. Currently a ton of resources are just crammed into the 05_deployment.yaml file.

Examples:
https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/tree/master/manifests
https://github.com/openshift/console-operator/tree/master/manifests

The three actual changes are

  1. A new non-default service account for the operator since we will soon have others in the namespace. I believe this is upgrade safe. It will just leave behind an unused default SA with its bindings. New installs won't have this.
  2. Removal of an unused service
  3. Removal of control-plane: controller-manager and controller-tools.k8s.io: "1.0" labels (manifests: reorganize to match infra operator convention #186 (comment))

@dgoodwin @joelddiaz @derekwaynecarr

@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor Author

gah, forgot to update the serviceAccountName in the deployment

@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor Author

ok, turns out the spec.selector in a Deployment is immutable. so... labels are going back!

@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws

@dgoodwin
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 24, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dgoodwin, sjenning

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 24, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor Author

master is frozen but this is approved. will carry this commit in the base of ongoing PRs. next is #185

@sjenning sjenning closed this Apr 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants