-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 367
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove upstream UI URLs #1223
Remove upstream UI URLs #1223
Conversation
/lgtm |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
This change implements the first stage of deprecating upstream UI components that we no lonbger wish to support. See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1658 anmd related changes in openshift/console-operator#562 and openshift/console#9276
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: PhilipGough, simonpasquier The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Ah I realized that we should probably keep the |
/hold |
@simonpasquier I've addressed you comment (I think) in a second commit just so it is easier to review the change but lets squash them prior to merge. That change also led me to question how/if we will handle the cleanup of routes or are we going to continue to create those? |
@philipgough: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@philipgough: PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Closing as obsolete - "the current plan is to keep the routes (because of the multi-cluster console effort which is going to be dev preview in 4.10)" |
This is related to console/#9276 and see epic 1591 for context