Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Refactor controller runtime #289

Conversation

cynepco3hahue
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@cynepco3hahue cynepco3hahue changed the title Refactor controller runtime WIP: Refactor controller runtime Nov 9, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 9, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 9, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cynepco3hahue
To complete the pull request process, please assign kpouget after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @kpouget in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 14, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 15, 2021

const ClusterOperatorName = "node-tuning"

// Reconciler reconciles a Tuned object and creates the tuned daemon set
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is ment for the CO and not tuned object I assume

return reconcile.Result{}, nil
}

func (r *Reconciler) syncDaemonSet() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this should be removed from the current controller and handled in the CVO controller ?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 19, 2021
Artyom Lukianov added 2 commits December 22, 2021 15:49
Signed-off-by: Artyom Lukianov <alukiano@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Artyom Lukianov <alukiano@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 22, 2021
Artyom Lukianov added 2 commits December 23, 2021 17:06
Signed-off-by: Artyom Lukianov <alukiano@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Artyom Lukianov <alukiano@redhat.com>
@cynepco3hahue cynepco3hahue force-pushed the refactor_controller_runtime branch 2 times, most recently from ded8226 to 1ca3514 Compare December 26, 2021 11:43
Artyom Lukianov added 2 commits December 27, 2021 11:18
Signed-off-by: Artyom Lukianov <alukiano@redhat.com>
- use golang 1.17
- fix the copy directive

Signed-off-by: Artyom Lukianov <alukiano@redhat.com>
@cynepco3hahue
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 27, 2021

@cynepco3hahue: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator c2ade74 link true /test e2e-aws-operator
ci/prow/e2e-aws c2ade74 link true /test e2e-aws
ci/prow/e2e-upgrade c2ade74 link true /test e2e-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@yanirq
Copy link
Contributor

yanirq commented Jan 10, 2022

@cynepco3hahue you can close this PR in favor of #302

@cynepco3hahue
Copy link
Contributor Author

Close in favor of #302

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants