Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

observability: Add multicluster-observability-addon proposal #1613

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JoaoBraveCoding
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 24, 2024

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@JoaoBraveCoding JoaoBraveCoding force-pushed the multicluster-observability-addon branch 2 times, most recently from f405a5b to c3299fa Compare April 26, 2024 17:19
@JoaoBraveCoding JoaoBraveCoding marked this pull request as ready for review April 26, 2024 17:21
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 26, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from jan--f and jotak April 26, 2024 17:21
hack/install-markdownlint.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@periklis
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

JoaoBraveCoding and others added 7 commits June 27, 2024 12:22
Co-authored-by: Periklis Tsirakidis <periklis@nefeli.eu>
Co-authored-by: Jan Fajerski <jan--f@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Israel Blancas <iblancasa@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Periklis Tsirakidis <periklis@nefeli.eu>
@JoaoBraveCoding JoaoBraveCoding force-pushed the multicluster-observability-addon branch from 11f4ca8 to 1ddc36b Compare June 27, 2024 11:27
- cluster-logs
```

#### Multi Cluster OTLP Collection and Forwarding
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@iblancasa could you please add a commit to this PR updating the resources for the tracing side? I'm mainly concerned with an up-to-date example of the OpenTelemetryCollector and the resulting resource in the ManifestWorks

@JoaoBraveCoding JoaoBraveCoding force-pushed the multicluster-observability-addon branch from 1ddc36b to d6c6627 Compare June 27, 2024 11:34
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: periklis

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2024

@JoaoBraveCoding: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/markdownlint d6c6627 link true /test markdownlint

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Inactive enhancement proposals go stale after 28d of inactivity.

See https://github.com/openshift/enhancements#life-cycle for details.

Mark the proposal as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale proposals rot after an additional 7d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this proposal from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this proposal is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 26, 2024
@periklis
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants