Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug: Deprecated Terraform Resource attribute for IBM Cloud Virtual Servers #8154

Closed
sean-freeman opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 8 comments
Closed
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@sean-freeman
Copy link

Version

All

Platform:

ibmcloud

Install types impacted:

  • ☑️ IPI (automated install with openshift-install)
  • ☑️ UPI (semi-manual installation on customised infrastructure)

What happened?

Errors during runtime:

DEBUG ibm_is_lb_pool_member.machine_config: Creation complete after 3m26s [id=]
DEBUG
DEBUG Warning: Deprecated attribute
DEBUG
DEBUG   on main.tf line 118, in resource "ibm_is_lb_pool_member" "kubernetes_api_public":
DEBUG  118:   target_address = ibm_is_instance.bootstrap_node.primary_network_interface.0.primary_ipv4_address
DEBUG
DEBUG The attribute "primary_ipv4_address" is deprecated. Refer to the provider
DEBUG documentation for details.
DEBUG
DEBUG (and 11 more similar warnings elsewhere)
DEBUG
DEBUG Apply complete! Resources: 12 added, 0 changed, 0 destroyed.

What you expected to happen?

No error, deprecation occured in the Terraform Provider a long while ago.

How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?

Any of the following code executed during normal runtime:
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aopenshift%2Finstaller%20primary_ipv4_address&type=code

Anything else we need to know?

Replacement code is simple:

Before:
ibm_is_instance.example.primary_network_interface.0.primary_ipv4_address
ibm_is_instance.example.primary_network_interface[0].primary_ipv4_address

After:
ibm_is_instance.example.primary_network_interface.0.primary_ip.0.address
ibm_is_instance.example.primary_network_interface[0].primary_ip[0].address

References

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 12, 2024
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 12, 2024
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this as completed Aug 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 12, 2024

@openshift-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sean-freeman
Copy link
Author

/reopen

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot reopened this Aug 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 12, 2024

@sean-freeman: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this as completed Sep 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 12, 2024

@openshift-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants