WIP: Use resource{apply,merge,read} functions provided by library-go where possible #829
Conversation
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
size/XXL
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: LorbusChris The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
approved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think the mcoresourceapply name is super hard for my eyeballs to read. And also there would be less changes if you left that name as-is resourceapply and instead named the resourceapply from libgo something like goresourceapply. less overall changes and clearer imo.
|
The added override in Gopkg.toml brings in a huge amount of changes in the second commit, i.e. when running |
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
|
/skip |
|
/retest |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
needs-rebase
openshift-ci-robot
removed
the
needs-rebase
LorbusChris
changed the title
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
LorbusChris
force-pushed
the
rid-lib
branch
4 times, most recently
from
fac4030
to
0c2217e
Compare
|
Verify going OOM may need us to request more memory in the pod in openshift/release? Probably worth trying to figure out how much memory it's using. |
| @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ func createDiscoveredControllerConfigSpec(infra *configv1.Infrastructure, networ | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| platform := "none" | |||
| //nolint:staticcheck | |||
| switch infra.Status.Platform { | |||
| case configv1.AWSPlatformType: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
strangely, this errors out on this branch, but not on master.
where possible, replacing the forked ones in `./lib/`.
Add events.Recorder as libgoRecorder to Operator struct.
Removed now unused files in `./lib/resource{apply,merge,read}`.
…switch `make verify` errors out here otherwise, and we are not ready yet to switch from deprecated infra.Status.Platform for platformStatus.type, yet.
|
This is now fully passing - I'd go with this PR and tackle the other library-go replacements in a follow up. I want this to fully get rid of our, now, super old fork and then we can try to understand a move to sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime as @ericavonb suggested on Slack. |
|
ack. will tidy the commit messages and bit before the merge. |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
do-not-merge/hold
|
To be clear, I don't think we need controller-runtime or librarygo for what we're doing. Here's what I think we should do: |
isn't that going against #817 (comment)? (apart from moving to library-go or not). I think here in MCO isn't about consistency, but rather flexibility of managing our own resources (as Abhinav highlighted in his comment above) |
Per #817 (comment):
The operand for the MCO are machine configurations and the server/daemons to facilitate that. As the operator reconciles its CR types, those CRD definitions would be requirements (along with the RBAC required to handle them) for the operator.
CRDs in particular can't be handled only by the operator without consideration to the rest of the clsuter because they are global objects. If anything needed to interact with one of them before the MCO ran, it would need that definition to exist and having more than one place attempt to create the definitions would be a much more difficult migration situation. This is why the openshift/api config CRDs are created via the cluster-config-operator* before other operators run and other operators include their CRDs in their payloads at earlier runlevels. * created by the CVO but included in a release via the cluster-config-operator payload. with the "create-only" annotation, you can utilize the CVO to create resources that you may want to modify later. |
|
@LorbusChris: PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
needs-rebase
I think a plus one for library-go (at least today) is about not having those helpers everywhere. See openshift/library-go#472 also, we're currently "broken", and having a single place for the helpers is at least beneficial to catch and fix stuff like that (I just noticed about that) |
|
will resurrect this PR on Monday! |
|
@LorbusChris: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
kikisdeliveryservice
added
the
lifecycle/stale
|
In an effort to clean up the MCO repo, closing old open PRs with no recent activity. Feel free to reopen. |
This is a first PR to partly tackle #819
- What I did
Added changes to use resource{apply,merge,read} functions provided by library-go where possible instead of the forked ones from ./lib/resource{apply,merge,read}.
Removed now unused files in ./lib/resource{apply,merge,read}.
Regenerated
- How to verify it
CI
- Description for the changelog