Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OSDOCS-12716: Changing URL to account for content movement #85274

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sferich888
Copy link
Contributor

@sferich888 sferich888 commented Nov 21, 2024

Version(s): 4.14

Changing the defined URL to account for content movement on the customer portal.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 21, 2024

@sferich888: This pull request references OSDOCS-12716 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Changing the defined URL to account for content movement on the customer portal.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 21, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 21, 2024
@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm absent a preview.

@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh added this to the Continuous Release milestone Nov 21, 2024
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2024

@sferich888: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 22, 2024

@sferich888: This pull request references OSDOCS-12716 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.12+

Changing the defined URL to account for content movement on the customer portal.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 22, 2024

@sferich888: This pull request references OSDOCS-12716 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.14

Changing the defined URL to account for content movement on the customer portal.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@lpettyjo
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Applied only to 4.14 since that is the only version with this content.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.14 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants