Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

apimachinery: remove pre-apigroups import path logic #15727

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

apimachinery: remove pre-apigroups import path logic #15727

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

sttts
Copy link
Contributor

@sttts sttts commented Aug 10, 2017

No description provided.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 10, 2017
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 11, 2017
@sttts sttts force-pushed the sttts-import-prefix branch 3 times, most recently from 3d2ff84 to e7adf08 Compare August 11, 2017 14:46
@sttts sttts mentioned this pull request Aug 11, 2017
Merged
deads2k
deads2k reviewed Aug 11, 2017
View reviewed changes
pkg/api/meta/install.go Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
package meta
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pkg/api/legacy?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, didn't know where to put it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

deads2k
deads2k reviewed Aug 11, 2017
View reviewed changes
pkg/api/meta/install.go Outdated
if err := addToCore(scheme); err != nil {
glog.Fatal(err)
}
if err := addToCoreV1(kapi.Scheme); err != nil {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this scheme hardcoded?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it shouldn't

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

deads2k
deads2k reviewed Aug 11, 2017
View reviewed changes
pkg/api/meta/install.go Outdated
func InstallLegacy(group string, addToCore, addToCoreV1 func(*runtime.Scheme) error, groupFactoryRegistry announced.APIGroupFactoryRegistry, registry *registered.APIRegistrationManager, scheme *runtime.Scheme) {
groupMetaFactory, found := groupFactoryRegistry[group]
if !found {
glog.Fatalf("Group %q not found", group)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we normally panic, right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we? will change that.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Aug 11, 2017

Minor comments. After they are fixed up, this lgtm

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Aug 11, 2017

/approve

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Aug 11, 2017
@sttts
UPSTREAM: 50094: apimachinery: remove pre-apigroups import path logic
12f1bfb
@sttts
Remove Store.ImportPrefix everywhere
8de8108
@sttts
Update etcd path test to always use kindWhiteList
fabc231 
Most types now have valid rest mappings because
NewDefaultRESTMapperFromScheme no longer ignores certain import
paths.  Thus we can no longer use the lack of a valid REST mapping
as an indicator for when to use kindWhiteList.  Thus kindWhiteList
now serves as a whitelist for all kinds and not just those that
formally had no mapping.  This does mean that we could whitelist
kinds due to a name conflict, but that is unlikely as names such as
GetOptions are not appropriate for new objects.
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 15, 2017
@sttts
Unify and simplify legacy api installation
abee9c6 
At the same time we get rid of the need for Store.ImportPrefix to filter the RESTMapper for each
legacy group. Before this commit we had overlapping RESTMapper, even inconsistent ones because
the root kinds were wrong outside of each legacy group.
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Aug 17, 2017

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 17, 2017
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Aug 17, 2017

/test all

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Aug 17, 2017

@sttts I happened to be near here again today. this is on my wishlist.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Aug 23, 2017

@sttts consistently failing test-cmd

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@deads2k deads2k mentioned this pull request Aug 24, 2017
Merged
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Aug 24, 2017

I opened #15955 to fix the compile error and it hit a serialization change in oc run and failed test-cmd.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

14 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sttts: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/openshift-jenkins/cmd abee9c6 link /test cmd

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sttts PR needs rebase

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 1, 2017
openshift-merge-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2017
@openshift-merge-robot
Merge pull request #15955 from deads2k/server-37-import
33e16e8 
Automatic merge from submit-queue

import prefix

adds a fix for TSB from #15727
@sttts sttts closed this Sep 25, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@deads2k deads2k deads2k left review comments

Assignees

@soltysh soltysh

@smarterclayton smarterclayton

@deads2k deads2k

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
8 participants
@sttts @deads2k @openshift-merge-robot @openshift-bot @enj @openshift-ci-robot @soltysh @smarterclayton