Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DO_NOT_MERGE] hardcode OS_BUILD_ENV_TMP_VOLUME to chase the etcd timeouts #16429

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor

@mfojtik mfojtik commented Sep 19, 2017

Just to exercise the tests.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 19, 2017
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mfojtik

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 19, 2017
@mfojtik mfojtik changed the title wip: bump etcd electionMs [DO_NOT_MERGE] bump etcd electionMs Sep 19, 2017
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 19, 2017
@mfojtik mfojtik changed the title [DO_NOT_MERGE] bump etcd electionMs [DO_NOT_MERGE] hardcode OS_BUILD_ENV_TMP_VOLUME to chase the etcd timeouts Sep 19, 2017
@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor Author

mfojtik commented Sep 19, 2017

first one passed \o/

@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor Author

mfojtik commented Sep 19, 2017

flake: #14385

/test extended_networking_minimal

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Sep 19, 2017

10 out of 10 for integration.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Sep 19, 2017

8 out of 10 for test-cmd, looks like docker hub flakes (different failure mode, not etcd timeout) for the failing two. Looks like we found it.

@mfojtik mfojtik closed this Sep 19, 2017
@mfojtik mfojtik deleted the test-etcd-electionms branch September 5, 2018 21:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants