Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UPSTREAM: <carry>: ensure hijackedConn implements CloseWrite function #18883

Conversation

jim-minter
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 7, 2018
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Mar 7, 2018
@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Mar 7, 2018

@derekwaynecarr @mrunalp we need to decide if we think this is critical for 3.9. S2I was still using docker-engine in 3.9 so it is not vulnerable to the bug, what we aren't sure of is whether any other aspect of origin/k8s is.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Mar 7, 2018

@mrunalp
Copy link
Member

mrunalp commented Mar 7, 2018

@bparees Yes, I agree that we should add this to 3.9.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Mar 7, 2018

/lgtm
(with @derekwaynecarr's concurrence)

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Mar 7, 2018
@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

liggitt commented Mar 7, 2018

title of UPSTREAM: docker/docker: 36517: ensure hijackedConn implements CloseWrite function will make travis happier

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Mar 7, 2018

I think https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550644 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552670 indicates we need this in 3.9

@juanvallejo this may address your 2 bugs

@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

liggitt commented Mar 7, 2018

adding carries to this dependency mean we need a fork at https://github.com/openshift/docker-docker and a glide.yaml update or the next glide update will revert this

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Mar 7, 2018

adding carries to this dependency mean we need a fork at https://github.com/openshift/docker-docker and a glide.yaml update or the next glide update will revert this

yeah that's what i was afraid of.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Mar 7, 2018

/hold
(for commit text update)

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 7, 2018
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 7, 2018
@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Mar 7, 2018

/hold cancel
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Mar 7, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bparees, jim-minter

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@eparis
Copy link
Member

eparis commented Mar 7, 2018

3.9 milestone gets you near the top. retest-not-required gets you to the very top :)

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Mar 7, 2018

3.9 milestone gets you near the top. retest-not-required gets you to the very top :)

which is where this should be since it could be causing some of our test flakes in the 3.9 branch (it is definitely causing them in master).

it also saves our merge queue some work retesting something for no good reason.

@eparis
Copy link
Member

eparis commented Mar 7, 2018

/retest

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic merge from submit-queue.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a9ce967 into openshift:release-3.9 Mar 7, 2018
@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

liggitt commented Mar 22, 2018

reported upstream in kubernetes/kubernetes#61557

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. retest-not-required size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants