Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

V0.1.29 rebase master #20

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Aug 20, 2018

Conversation

jboyd01
Copy link

@jboyd01 jboyd01 commented Aug 15, 2018

No description provided.

carolynvs and others added 20 commits July 27, 2018 08:12
It was using getCmd instead of describeCmd
…ubernetes-retired#2237)

* remove from travis integration-tests which are now running in prow

* document why we build what we're building
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
* Add ginkgo tests for svcat get classes

* Update generated code

* Test the Run method instead of getAll
…rnetes-retired#2190)

* Add svcat command to create user-defined cluster-scoped classes

* Code improvements following review

- Add 'create' command to svcat main.go;
- Changes Cobra command declaration;
- Improve new test on pkg/svcat/service-catalog/class_test.go
- Fix data provided to new generated class on cmd/svcat/class/create_cmd.go
- Print success message to the user after creating a class
- Add unittest to cmd/svcat/svcat_test.go
- Update goldenfiles

* Fix help messaging language

* Use class data got from RetrieveClassByName to pass to CreateClass in cmd

* Fix create class unit test on pkg

* Fix pkg tests for CreateClass

- Change Name instead of ExternalName

* Fix cmd tests for CreateClass

- Change Name instead of ExternalName
- Add CreateClass to sdk interface

* Update golden files

* Use WriteClassDetails instead of only printing the name of new class

* Add CreateClass to fake_svcat_client.go

* Add create_cmd_test.go

* Add entry to docs/cli

* Add comments to fix lint messages

* Fix wrongly removed function from FakeSvcatClient
- sort OWNERS file alphabetically
)

* Retrieve brokers by scope

* Add Broker interface

* Apply Namespaced interface to svcat get broker command

* List namespaced brokers with svcat

* Add ns-scoped broker testdata

* Sync generated files with new broker flags

* Sync golden files

* Update generated fake

* Update unit tests for RetrieveBrokers to validate ns-scoped brokers too

* Add unit tests for get brokers command

* Document listing namespaced brokers with svcat
…t 80 cols (kubernetes-retired#2226)

* Make the last col of get-classes and get-plans wider so we're at least 80 cols

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>

* make it generic

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
This isn't 100% correct, but it's a pretty good approximation.
Specifically, it doesn't know about transitive dependencies from other
go packages.  But it'll rebuild a generator if any code inside its
package changes (or build them all if anything in gengo changes).
…be used appropriately for all types (kubernetes-retired#2214)

* Ensure that ObjectMeta field selectors (e.g. name and namespace) can be used appropriately for all types

* Add client tests for namespaced resources
Merge executed via ./UPSTREAM-MERGE.sh v0.1.29 upstream master

Overwritten conflicts:
<NONE>
@jboyd01
Copy link
Author

jboyd01 commented Aug 16, 2018

/test service-catalog

@jboyd01
Copy link
Author

jboyd01 commented Aug 16, 2018

/retest

1 similar comment
@jboyd01
Copy link
Author

jboyd01 commented Aug 17, 2018

/retest

@jboyd01
Copy link
Author

jboyd01 commented Aug 17, 2018

CI should be picking up openshift/origin#20673
/retest

@jboyd01
Copy link
Author

jboyd01 commented Aug 17, 2018

/retest

1 similar comment
@jboyd01
Copy link
Author

jboyd01 commented Aug 20, 2018

/retest

@jboyd01
Copy link
Author

jboyd01 commented Aug 20, 2018

/test service-catalog

@jpeeler
Copy link

jpeeler commented Aug 20, 2018

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 20, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jboyd01, jpeeler

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 20, 2018
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4007468 into openshift:master Aug 20, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.