Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add BarbicanSpecCore struct #105

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2024

Conversation

dprince
Copy link
Contributor

@dprince dprince commented Feb 23, 2024

This version of the struct (called "core") is meant to be used via the OpenStackControlplane. It is the same as BarbicanSpec only it is missing the containerImages from the nested API, Backup, Scheduler, and Volume specs.

The Default() function for webhooks has been split accordingly.

Jira: OSPRH-4835

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 23, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dprince

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@dprince dprince force-pushed the core_api branch 3 times, most recently from 6ee75a5 to a1bea9c Compare February 28, 2024 15:18
This version of the struct (called "core") is meant to
be used via the OpenStackControlplane. It is the same
as BarbicanSpec only it is missing the containerImages.

The Default() function for webhooks has been split accordingly.

Jira: OSPRH-4835
@vakwetu
Copy link
Contributor

vakwetu commented Mar 5, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Mar 5, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 95cf5d9 into openstack-k8s-operators:main Mar 5, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants