refactor(breadcrumb): [breadcrumb] refactor breadcrumb theme vars #2209
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@zzcr has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes involve a comprehensive update to the breadcrumb component's styling, focusing on the renaming of CSS variables from a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/theme/src/breadcrumb/index.less (3 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/breadcrumb/vars.less (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
packages/theme/src/breadcrumb/vars.less (8)
15-15: Font size variable update looks good.The renaming of the font size variable to
--tv-Breadcrumb-font-sizealigns with the new naming convention. The value has been correctly updated to reference the new--tv-prefixed variable.
17-17: Text line height variable update is correct.The renaming of the text line height variable to
--tv-Breadcrumb-text-line-heightand updating its value tovar(--tv-line-height-number)are consistent with the new naming convention.
19-19: Text color variable update is appropriate.The renaming of the text color variable to
--tv-Breadcrumb-text-coloraligns with the new naming convention. The value correctly uses the--tv-prefixed variable.
21-21: Separator icon color variable update improves clarity.The renaming of the separator color variable to
--tv-Breadcrumb-separator-icon-colornot only aligns with the new naming convention but also more accurately describes its purpose (icon color instead of text color). The value has been correctly updated to use the--tv-prefixed variable.
23-27: Separator width and margin updates enhance flexibility.The changes to the separator variables are well-considered:
- Renaming
--tv-Breadcrumb-separator-widthaligns with the new convention.- Changing
margin-horizontaltomargin-xis more concise and follows common CSS practices.- The addition of
--tv-Breadcrumb-separator-margin-yprovides more styling flexibility.These updates will allow for more precise control over the separator's appearance.
29-29: Text font weight variable update is consistent.The renaming of the text font weight variable to
--tv-Breadcrumb-text-font-weightand updating its value tovar(--tv-font-weight-bold)are in line with the new naming convention.
13-29: Overall, excellent refactoring of breadcrumb theme variables.This refactoring consistently updates all breadcrumb-related CSS variables to follow the new
--tv-prefix convention and improves naming clarity. The changes include:
- Renaming the main function to
.inject-Breadcrumb-vars().- Updating all variable names to use the
--tv-Breadcrumb-prefix.- Improving some variable names for better clarity (e.g.,
separator-icon-color).- Adding a new variable for vertical separator margin.
These changes enhance consistency across the codebase and improve the maintainability of the breadcrumb component's styling. Great job on this refactoring!
13-13: Function name change looks good, verify usage.The new function name
.inject-Breadcrumb-vars()is more descriptive and follows a consistent naming convention. This is a good improvement.Please run the following script to ensure all references to this function have been updated:
✅ Verification successful
Function name change verified successfully.
All references to
.component-css-vars-breadcrumb()have been removed, and.inject-Breadcrumb-vars()is correctly used inpackages/theme/src/breadcrumb/index.less.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to the old function name rg --type less "\.component-css-vars-breadcrumb\(\)" # Search for usage of the new function name rg --type less "\.inject-Breadcrumb-vars\(\)"Length of output: 240
packages/theme/src/breadcrumb/index.less (6)
20-20: LGTM: Method name updated to follow new naming convention.The change from
.component-css-vars-breadcrumb()to.inject-Breadcrumb-vars()aligns with the PR's refactoring objective and follows a more descriptive naming convention.
22-23: LGTM: CSS variables updated to new naming convention.The font-size and line-height variables have been updated to use the new
--tv-Breadcrumb-prefix, which is more specific to the Breadcrumb component and aligns with the refactoring objective.
33-33: LGTM: Font-weight variable updated to new naming convention.The font-weight variable has been updated to use the new
--tv-Breadcrumb-prefix, consistent with the other variable changes and the refactoring objective.
58-58: LGTM: Text color variable updated and hover state simplified.The text color variable now uses the new naming convention, and the hover state has been simplified to use a consistent underline style. These changes improve maintainability and align with the refactoring objective.
Also applies to: 62-62, 66-66
72-74: LGTM: Separator style variables updated to new naming convention.The CSS variables for separator styles (font-family, color, margins, width) have been updated to use the new
--tv-Breadcrumb-prefix. This change is consistent with the refactoring objective and improves the specificity of the variables to the Breadcrumb component.Also applies to: 77-77
81-83: LGTM: Separator class style variables updated and code formatting improved.The CSS variables for separator class styles (font-size, fill, margins) have been updated to use the new
--tv-Breadcrumb-prefix, consistent with the refactoring objective. The addition of an empty line at 90 improves code readability by separating different style blocks.Also applies to: 90-90
| @@ -50,54 +47,49 @@ | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| & &__item--medium { | |||
| font-size: 14px; | |||
| font-size: 16px; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a CSS variable for medium font size.
The font size for medium-sized breadcrumb items is currently hard-coded to 16px. To maintain consistency with the theme variable approach and improve maintainability, consider using a CSS variable instead.
Here's a suggested change:
- font-size: 16px;
+ font-size: var(--tv-Breadcrumb-medium-font-size, 16px);This change allows for easy customization while providing a default value.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| font-size: 16px; | |
| font-size: var(--tv-Breadcrumb-medium-font-size, 16px); |
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes