fix(anchor): [anchor] Reconstruct the anchor theme. #2225
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a comprehensive update to the anchor component's styling and theming. It involves changing the CSS variable naming convention from Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
bug
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
packages/theme/src/anchor/old-theme.js (3)
2-2: Approve key change, but consider updating CSS variable name.The key has been successfully updated to follow the new 'tv-' prefix convention. However, for consistency, consider updating the CSS variable name as well.
Consider updating the CSS variable name to match the new prefix:
- 'tv-Anchor-link-text-color-active': 'var(--ti-common-color-primary-active, #7693f5)', + 'tv-Anchor-link-text-color-active': 'var(--tv-common-color-primary-active, #7693f5)',
4-4: Approve key change, but consider updating CSS variable name.The key has been successfully updated to follow the new 'tv-' prefix convention. However, for consistency, consider updating the CSS variable name as well.
Consider updating the CSS variable name to match the new prefix:
- 'tv-Anchor-line-bg-color': 'var(--ti-common-color-text-primary, #252b3a)', + 'tv-Anchor-line-bg-color': 'var(--tv-common-color-text-primary, #252b3a)',
5-5: Approve key change, but consider updating CSS variable name.The key has been successfully updated to follow the new 'tv-' prefix convention. However, for consistency, consider updating the CSS variable name as well.
Consider updating the CSS variable name to match the new prefix:
- 'tv-Anchor-text-color': 'var(--ti-common-color-text-primary, #252b3a)', + 'tv-Anchor-text-color': 'var(--tv-common-color-text-primary, #252b3a)',packages/theme/src/anchor/vars.less (2)
15-27: LGTM! Consider adding comments for clarity.The new variable declarations are well-structured and follow a consistent naming convention. The use of CSS variables for values promotes maintainability and theming flexibility.
Consider adding brief comments for each variable to explain their purpose, especially for less obvious ones like
--tv-Anchor-link-margin-left. This would enhance code readability and maintainability. For example:// Width of the anchor component --tv-Anchor-width: calc(var(--tv-size-base, 4px) * 40); // Left margin for anchor links --tv-Anchor-link-margin-left: var(--tv-space-md, 8px);
29-41: LGTM! Consider standardizing comment format.The line type variables are well-defined and provide comprehensive customization options. The naming is consistent and descriptive, which enhances maintainability.
For consistency, consider standardizing the comment format for all variables. Currently, some comments end with a period while others don't. For example:
// Line type // Vertical track width --tv-Anchor-orbit-width: var(--tv-size-base, 4px); // Background color of the selected anchor mask --tv-Anchor-link-mask-bg-color: rgba(80, 115, 229, 0.15); // Background color of the vertical track --tv-Anchor-orbit-bg-color: var(--tv-color-border-divider-short, #dbdbdb);packages/theme/src/anchor/index.less (1)
144-146: Potential specificity issue with combined selectorsThe combined selector
&:hover, &--activemight not apply styles as intended due to specificity conflicts between pseudo-classes and modifier classes. To ensure the styles apply correctly, consider separating the selectors or adjusting their order.Consider adjusting the selector for better specificity:
- &:hover, - &--active { + &--active, + &:hover {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- packages/theme/src/anchor/index.less (3 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/anchor/old-theme.js (1 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/anchor/vars.less (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/theme/src/anchor/old-theme.js (2)
3-3: LGTM: Key updated correctly.The key has been successfully updated to follow the new 'tv-' prefix convention. The value remains unchanged, which is correct.
6-6: Approve key change, but question value format.The key has been successfully updated to follow the new 'tv-' prefix convention. However, the value format seems unusual for a width property.
Is "'auto'" (with single quotes) the intended value format? Typically, CSS width properties use just
autowithout quotes. Consider verifying if this is intentional or if it should be changed to:- 'tv-Anchor-width': "'auto'" + 'tv-Anchor-width': 'auto'packages/theme/src/anchor/vars.less (1)
13-53: Excellent refactoring of variable structure and naming convention.The overall structure of the file has been significantly improved:
- The use of the
.inject-anchor-vars()mixin allows for flexible integration of these variables.- The consistent
--tv-prefix aligns with the project's naming convention.- Logical grouping of variables (general, line type, dot type) enhances readability and maintainability.
These changes will make the code more maintainable and easier to understand for other developers.
packages/theme/src/anchor/index.less (1)
80-80: Consistent usage ofcalc()for border-radiusIn line 80, you correctly use
calc()for theborder-radiuscalculation. Ensure that this usage is consistent throughout the file, especially in areas where arithmetic operations with CSS variables are performed.
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation