feat(theme): optimize the overall basic variables and update treeMenu css var #2534
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to several LESS stylesheet files. The primary changes include formatting adjustments for CSS variable declarations, enhancing readability, and updating specific variable references. Notably, the variable Changes
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
[e2e-test-warn] The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug". Please make sure you've read our contributing guide |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/theme/src/tree-menu/index.less (2)
243-246: Consider dynamic height for the left border indicatorThe current node styling changes look good overall, but there's room for improvement:
- The hardcoded
32pxheight for the left border indicator might not scale well with different node heights or when text wraps (especially in the wrap mode).- The sudden switch to
boldfont-weight might cause layout shifts.Consider these improvements:
& > .@{tree-node-prefix-cls}__content::before { content: ''; position: absolute; left: 0; top: 50%; display: inline-block; - height: 32px; + height: calc(100% - 4px); /* Subtract a small gap for visual polish */ transform: translateY(-50%); border-left: 2px solid var(--tv-TreeMenu-square-left-border-color); } .tree-node-body { - font-weight: bold; + font-weight: 600; /* Using 600 instead of bold reduces layout shift */ }
Line range hint
1-324: Consider architectural improvements for better maintainabilityA few suggestions to enhance the component's architecture:
Consider extracting hardcoded values to CSS variables for better theme customization:
24pxfor toggle button dimensions0.5sfor transition duration64pxfor expand height- Various spacing values
Performance considerations:
- The
widthtransition might cause layout thrashing- Consider using
transforminstead for better performance- Add
will-changehints for animated propertiesDocumentation:
- Consider adding comments to document the various states (collapsed, expanded, current, etc.)
- Document the expected DOM structure for proper styling
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/theme/src/base/old-theme.less(3 hunks)packages/theme/src/tree-menu/index.less(2 hunks)packages/theme/src/tree-menu/vars.less(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/theme/src/tree-menu/vars.less
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/theme/src/base/old-theme.less
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/theme/src/tree-menu/index.less (1)
151-151: LGTM: Border color variable usage is consistent
The change appropriately uses the dedicated --tv-TreeMenu-border-top-color variable for the input's top border, maintaining theme consistency.
zzcr
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tree-menu/lazy-load-composition-api.vue (3)
20-22: Consider using constants for label values.The hard-coded strings '表单组件' and '数据组件' should be defined as constants to improve maintainability and prevent typos.
+ const FORM_COMPONENT_LABEL = '表单组件' + const DATA_COMPONENT_LABEL = '数据组件' function loadNode(node, resolve) { if (node.level === 0) { - return resolve([{ label: '表单组件' }, { label: '数据组件' }]) + return resolve([{ label: FORM_COMPONENT_LABEL }, { label: DATA_COMPONENT_LABEL }]) } // ... - if (node.data.label === '表单组件') { + if (node.data.label === FORM_COMPONENT_LABEL) { hasChild = true - } else if (node.data.label === '数据组件') { + } else if (node.data.label === DATA_COMPONENT_LABEL) { hasChild = false }
20-22: Add test coverage for the new label conditions.The changes to label conditions should be covered by unit tests to ensure the tree menu behaves correctly with the new specification.
Would you like me to help generate test cases for these scenarios:
- Verifying hasChild behavior for '表单组件'
- Verifying hasChild behavior for '数据组件'
- Testing the default random case
20-22: Document the business logic behind label conditions.Add comments explaining why certain labels determine the presence of child nodes. This will help future maintainers understand the business rules.
+ // Form components always have child nodes to show nested form elements if (node.data.label === '表单组件') { hasChild = true + // Data components are leaf nodes with no children } else if (node.data.label === '数据组件') { hasChild = false }examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tree-menu/lazy-load.vue (2)
Line range hint
18-53: Consider refactoring the loadNode implementationThe current implementation has several areas that could be improved:
- Magic numbers (level > 3) should be constants
- Random child generation (
Math.random() > 0.5) in production code is unpredictable- Hardcoded timeout (500ms) should be configurable
- Label generation using counter might lead to duplicate labels if component is reused
Consider this refactoring:
+ const MAX_TREE_DEPTH = 3; + const LOAD_DELAY = 500; + methods: { + generateNodeLabel(type, index) { + return `${type}${index}`; + }, loadNode(node, resolve) { if (node.level === 0) { return resolve([{ label: '表单组件' }, { label: '数据组件' }]) } - if (node.level > 3) return resolve([]) + if (node.level > MAX_TREE_DEPTH) return resolve([]) let hasChild if (node.data.label === '表单组件') { hasChild = true } else if (node.data.label === '数据组件') { hasChild = false } else { - hasChild = Math.random() > 0.5 + hasChild = node.level < MAX_TREE_DEPTH } setTimeout(() => { let data if (hasChild) { data = [ { label: this.generateNodeLabel('表单组件', this.count++) }, { label: this.generateNodeLabel('数据组件', this.count++) } ] } else { data = [] } resolve(data) - }, 500) + }, LOAD_DELAY) } }
Line range hint
1-3: Add error handling for load failuresThe tree menu doesn't handle loading errors. Consider adding error handling to improve user experience.
<template> - <tiny-tree-menu :data="[]" lazy :load="loadNode"></tiny-tree-menu> + <tiny-tree-menu + :data="[]" + lazy + :load="loadNode" + @load-error="handleLoadError"> + </tiny-tree-menu> </template>Add the error handler method:
methods: { handleLoadError(err, node) { console.error('Failed to load node:', node.data.label, err); // Handle the error appropriately } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tree-menu/lazy-load-composition-api.vue(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tree-menu/lazy-load.vue(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tree-menu/lazy-load-composition-api.vue (1)
20-22: Verify the label changes across the codebase.
Let's ensure these label changes are consistently applied across all related components and documentation.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tree-menu/lazy-load.vue (1)
29-30: Verify the label change impact on existing tree structures
The condition has been changed to check for '数据组件' (data component) instead of the previous label. This change might affect existing tree structures and their expansion behavior.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
packages/theme/src/roles/vars.less (1)
15-15: Consider adding English translations to commentsWhile the Chinese comments are consistent with the codebase, consider adding English translations to improve international developer experience.
- // 下拉面板选项高度 + // 下拉面板选项高度 (Dropdown panel option height) --tv-Roles-poplist-item-height: var(--tv-size-height-md);packages/theme/src/dept/vars.less (1)
Documentation needs to be updated with styling information
The component documentation in both Chinese and English versions lacks any information about styling or theming capabilities. Since the changes introduce new CSS variables for styling the Dept component, the documentation should be updated to include:
- Available CSS variables for customization
- Default styling behavior
- Any visual changes from previous versions
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-24: Update documentation to reflect the styling changes.Since this change is part of adapting to an old specification, please ensure that:
- The component's documentation reflects these styling updates
- Any breaking visual changes are documented
Let's check for existing documentation:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Look for component documentation files # Expected: Find documentation files that might need updates # Search for documentation files related to the Dept component fd -e md -e mdx "dept|tree-menu" docs/Length of output: 133
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search for documentation and component files # First, find the root structure to locate documentation ls -la # Then search for any files related to Dept component fd deptLength of output: 3758
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for documentation or component files using ripgrep rg -i "dept" -g "*.{md,mdx,vue,js,ts}" -lLength of output: 6948
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for the component's main file to find potential documentation fd -e vue -e js -e ts "dept"Length of output: 723
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the content of the documentation files we found cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dept/webdoc/dept.cn.md cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dept/webdoc/dept.en.mdLength of output: 397
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's also check if there are any style-related documentation in the demo files rg -A 5 "style|css|theme|--tv-" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dept/webdoc/dept.jsLength of output: 81
packages/theme/src/dropdown-menu/vars.less (1)
Line range hint
14-25: Consider adding English translations for comments.The file contains Chinese comments explaining each variable. Consider adding English translations to improve maintainability for international contributors.
Example translation for the first comment:
// 下拉菜单弹框的阴影 + // Dropdown menu shadowpackages/theme/src/upload-dragger/vars.less (1)
23-23: LGTM! Consider updating design system documentation.The change to use
--tv-border-radius-mdis technically correct and aligns with the standardization of border radius values. However, since this appears to be part of a broader design system update:Consider:
- Documenting this standardization in your design system guidelines
- Creating a migration guide for teams that might be affected by these border radius changes
packages/theme/src/link-menu/vars.less (1)
Line range hint
25-43: Consider documenting size changes in theme migration guideThese size adjustments from default to medium might affect existing implementations. Consider documenting these changes in a theme migration guide to help users understand and adapt to the new specifications.
Would you like me to help draft documentation for these theme changes?
packages/theme/src/option/vars.less (1)
39-39: Document the size specification changeSince this change is part of a broader standardization to medium sizes across components, consider adding a comment explaining the rationale for using
--tv-size-height-mdspecifically.// 选项高度 - --tv-Option-height: var(--tv-size-height-md, 32px); + // Using medium size for consistency across components + --tv-Option-height: var(--tv-size-height-md, 32px);packages/theme/src/selected-box/vars.less (1)
40-40: LGTM! Consider documenting the size standardization.The change from
--tv-size-height-defaultto--tv-size-height-mdaligns with the broader standardization to medium sizes across components.Consider adding a comment explaining this standardization effort, perhaps in the component's documentation or README.
packages/theme/src/dropdown-item/vars.less (1)
52-52: Document the height variable changeConsider adding a comment explaining why the height variable was standardized to medium size, as this appears to be part of a broader change affecting multiple components.
// 菜单项高度(默认） - --tv-DropdownItem-height: var(--tv-size-height-md, 32px); + // Using medium size for consistency across components + --tv-DropdownItem-height: var(--tv-size-height-md, 32px);packages/theme/src/search/vars.less (1)
Line range hint
17-65: LGTM! Consider updating component documentation.The changes consistently update the search component's dimensions to medium specifications, which aligns with the PR objective. The code is well-documented with clear comments.
Consider updating the component's documentation to reflect these size changes, particularly noting any visual differences users should expect.
packages/theme/src/pager/vars.less (1)
Line range hint
43-93: Overall size adjustments look consistentThe changes consistently update component dimensions from default to medium sizes, which aligns with the PR objective of adapting to old specifications. The modifications maintain internal consistency by using the same size variant (
md) across height and border-radius properties.Consider documenting these size changes in the component's documentation to help users understand the visual differences and any potential layout impacts.
packages/theme/src/cascader/vars.less (2)
23-23: LGTM! Consider documenting the border radius standardization.The change from
--tv-border-radius-defaultto--tv-border-radius-mdaligns with the broader effort to standardize border radius values across components. The fallback value remains consistent at 6px.Consider updating the Chinese comment above the variable to indicate that this is using the medium border radius specification:
- // 边框圆角 + // 边框圆角 (使用中等大小规格)
Line range hint
1-100: Consider cleanup of unused variables and documentation.The file contains several variables marked as "没有生效" (not in effect) and references to non-existent values marked as "无对应变量" (no corresponding variable). This suggests potential technical debt that should be addressed.
Consider:
- Removing or implementing the unused variables
- Creating the missing corresponding variables
- Documenting the rationale for keeping any currently unused variables that may be needed in the future
Would you like me to help create a tracking issue for this cleanup task?
packages/theme/src/tabs/vars.less (1)
Line range hint
61-65: Consider adding English translations for commentsWhile the new small-size related variables are well structured, consider adding English translations alongside the Chinese comments to improve international developer experience.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (56)
packages/theme/src/autocomplete/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/base-select/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/base/index.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/base/old-theme.less(4 hunks)packages/theme/src/base/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/button-group/vars.less(2 hunks)packages/theme/src/button/vars.less(2 hunks)packages/theme/src/calendar/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/cascader-panel/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/cascader/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/checkbox-button/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/checkbox/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/color-picker/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/date-panel/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/date-table/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/dept/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/dialog-select/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/dropdown-item/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/dropdown-menu/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/fall-menu/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/form-item/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/grid/vars.less(3 hunks)packages/theme/src/input/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/ip-address/vars.less(3 hunks)packages/theme/src/link-menu/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/loading/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/milestone/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/nav-menu/vars.less(2 hunks)packages/theme/src/numeric/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/option/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/pager/vars.less(2 hunks)packages/theme/src/popeditor/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/radio-button/vars.less(2 hunks)packages/theme/src/radio/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/rich-text-editor/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/roles/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/search/vars.less(3 hunks)packages/theme/src/select-dropdown/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/select/vars.less(2 hunks)packages/theme/src/selected-box/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/slider/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/steps/vars.less(2 hunks)packages/theme/src/tabs/vars.less(4 hunks)packages/theme/src/tag/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/tall-storage/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/text-popup/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/textarea/vars.less(2 hunks)packages/theme/src/time-panel/vars.less(2 hunks)packages/theme/src/time-range/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/transfer/vars.less(2 hunks)packages/theme/src/tree-menu/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/upload-dragger/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/upload/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/user-card/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/user-link/vars.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/src/wizard/vars.less(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- packages/theme/src/autocomplete/vars.less
- packages/theme/src/base/index.less
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/theme/src/base/old-theme.less
- packages/theme/src/tree-menu/vars.less
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/theme/src/time-range/vars.less (1)
Learnt from: zzcr
PR: opentiny/tiny-vue#2481
File: packages/theme/src/time-range/vars.less:27-28
Timestamp: 2024-11-10T16:32:54.790Z
Learning: 在 `packages/theme/src/time-range/vars.less` 文件中，应使用 `var(--tv-TimeRange-header-height)` 作为 `--tv-TimeRange-header-line-height` 的值，以保持一致性。
🔇 Additional comments (80)
packages/theme/src/user-link/vars.less (1)
17-17: LGTM! Consistent with theme standardization.
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md aligns with the broader theme updates across components.
Let's verify the consistency of border radius updates across related components:
✅ Verification successful
Border radius standardization verified across components
The verification confirms consistent usage of --tv-border-radius-md across all theme components, including UserLink. The search results show that all related components in the theme package use the medium border radius variable, which validates this standardization effort.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent border radius variable usage across theme files
# Expected: Most component vars.less files should use --tv-border-radius-md
# Search for border-radius variable declarations in theme files
rg --type less "border-radius:.+(?:default|md)" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 4803
packages/theme/src/rich-text-editor/vars.less (2)
15-15: LGTM! Border radius update aligns with specification.
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md is consistent with the PR's objective of adapting components to the old specification.
15-15: Verify visual consistency across components.
Since this change is part of a broader update to border radius values across components, let's verify that all related components have been updated consistently.
✅ Verification successful
Border radius update is consistent with design system
The verification shows that:
- No components are using the old
defaultborder radius - The
--tv-border-radius-mdis consistently used across all components - The RichTextEditor properly uses and references the border radius variable
The change aligns with the broader design system where --tv-border-radius-md (6px) is the standard border radius for components, as defined in base/vars.less.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining components still using --tv-border-radius-default
# to ensure complete migration to --tv-border-radius-md
echo "Checking for components still using default border radius..."
rg --type=less "border-radius.*default" packages/theme/src/
echo "Checking components already migrated to medium border radius..."
rg --type=less "border-radius.*md" packages/theme/src/
echo "Checking if this component's border radius is referenced elsewhere..."
rg --type=less "RichTextEditor-options-border-radius" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 6484
packages/theme/src/roles/vars.less (1)
15-15: Verify the height change impact on tree menu component
The change from --tv-size-height-default to --tv-size-height-md is part of a broader standardization effort. However, since this PR's objective is to adapt the tree menu to old specifications, we should verify this change doesn't conflict with that goal.
✅ Verification successful
Height change aligns with tree menu and is part of consistent design system
The change to --tv-size-height-md is verified to be correct because:
- The tree menu component itself uses the same
--tv-size-height-mdvariable for its node height - This is part of a consistent design system where many components (buttons, inputs, selects, etc.) use the same medium height variable
- The old theme specification defines medium height as 28px, which is preserved in
old-theme.less
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the old specification used default or md height
# and verify the consistency across related components
# Search for height-related variables in old tree menu specifications
rg -l "tv-(size|height)" packages/theme/src/tree-menu/
rg -l "tv-(size|height)" packages/theme/src/tree/
# Check for any potential height-related regressions in components
# that might depend on Roles component
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends Roles {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 203
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the tree-menu vars file and any related height variables
cat packages/theme/src/tree-menu/vars.less
# Also check for any direct usage of the roles poplist height variable
rg --type less "tv-Roles-poplist-item-height" -A 2 -B 2
# Check if there are any other components using medium height for consistency
rg --type less "tv-size-height-md" -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 11339
packages/theme/src/tall-storage/vars.less (1)
17-17: LGTM! Verify consistency with other components.
The changes to medium sizes for both border-radius and height align with the PR objective of adapting to the old specification.
Let's verify that these changes are consistent with other components:
Also applies to: 19-19
✅ Verification successful
Changes are consistent with the broader theme standardization
The verification confirms that the changes to --tv-TallStorage-border-radius and --tv-TallStorage-item-height using medium-sized variables are consistent with the theme-wide pattern:
- The
border-radius-mdis widely used across 40+ components as their default border radius - The
size-height-mdis consistently used across 30+ components for their default heights - Both variables are properly defined in
base/vars.lessandbase/old-theme.lesswith appropriate values
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other components are using the same medium-sized variables
# for border-radius and height to ensure consistency across the theme.
echo "Checking border-radius-md usage across components:"
rg --type less "border-radius.*md" packages/theme/src/
echo -e "\nChecking height-md usage across components:"
rg --type less "height.*md" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 9838
packages/theme/src/dept/vars.less (1)
19-19: LGTM! Verify visual consistency across components.
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md aligns with the broader initiative to standardize border radii across components.
Let's verify the consistency of border radius usage across related components:
✅ Verification successful
Border radius change aligns with component design system
The change from default to medium border radius in --tv-Dept-selected-info-border-radius is consistent with the broader design system. Analysis of border radius usage across theme files shows:
- Most components use
--tv-border-radius-mdas their default border radius - Components like UserLink, Upload, Transfer, TimeRange, Textarea, and many others consistently use medium border radius
- The change aligns with the established pattern in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check border radius variable usage across theme files
# Expected: Consistent usage of --tv-border-radius-md
# Search for border radius variables in theme files
rg --type=less "border-radius: var\(--tv-(border-radius-|.*border-radius)" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 24270
packages/theme/src/dropdown-menu/vars.less (1)
19-19: LGTM! Verify consistency across components.
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md aligns with the standardization effort across the theme.
Let's verify the consistent usage of border radius variables across related components:
✅ Verification successful
Border radius standardization verified across theme components
The verification confirms consistent usage of --tv-border-radius-md across all theme components. The search results show that:
- All components use the medium border radius variable (
--tv-border-radius-md) - Some components include the fallback value of
6px, which matches the dropdown menu implementation - No instances of
border-radius-defaultwere found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of border radius variables across theme files
# Expected: All related components should use --tv-border-radius-md
# Search for border radius variables in theme files
rg --type less "border-radius:.*(default|md)" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 4801
packages/theme/src/user-card/vars.less (1)
17-17: LGTM: Border radius standardization
The update to use --tv-border-radius-md aligns with the broader standardization of border radius values across components.
packages/theme/src/text-popup/vars.less (2)
15-15: LGTM! Verify consistency with other components.
The change from default to medium border radius aligns with the broader theme updates.
Let's verify this is part of a consistent pattern across components:
✅ Verification successful
Border radius change is consistent across components
The verification confirms that --tv-border-radius-md is widely used across many components in the theme system, including form controls (Input, Select), containers (Dialog, Panel), and interactive elements (Button, Tag). This change to TextPopup aligns with the established pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other components are using the same border radius
# Expected: Find other components using --tv-border-radius-md
rg --type=less "border-radius.*tv-border-radius-md" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 5228
17-17: LGTM! Verify height consistency across related components.
The change from default to medium height maintains consistency with other component updates.
Let's verify the height variable usage pattern:
✅ Verification successful
Height variable usage is consistent across components ✅
The verification confirms that --tv-size-height-md is consistently used as the default height variable across multiple components in the theme package, including:
- Form controls (Input, Select, Button)
- Navigation elements (NavMenu, TreeMenu)
- Interactive components (Tabs, Slider)
- Content containers (TextPopup, TallStorage)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other components are using the same height variable
# Expected: Find other components using --tv-size-height-md
rg --type=less "height.*tv-size-height-md" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 3438
packages/theme/src/color-picker/vars.less (1)
5-5: Variable update aligns with theme standardization.
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md is consistent with the broader effort to standardize border radius variables across components.
packages/theme/src/cascader-panel/vars.less (1)
15-15: Verify if this border radius change aligns with the old specification.
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md appears to be part of a broader theme standardization. However, we need to ensure this aligns with the "old specification" mentioned in the PR title.
✅ Verification successful
The git history shows this was part of a cascader refactoring effort that changed variable naming from ti- prefix to tv- prefix and standardized border radius values. Let's gather more context about the specifications and related changes to make a more informed decision.
Border radius change aligns with the old specification
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md is correct and verified. The evidence shows:
-
This is part of a systematic theme standardization where:
- The base theme defines
--tv-border-radius-md: 6pxas the default - The old theme specification in
packages/theme/src/base/old-theme.lessexplicitly defines these values - The change maintains consistent border radius usage across multiple components
- The base theme defines
-
The git history reveals this was part of a broader cascader refactoring effort that standardized variable naming from
ti-prefix totv-prefix while maintaining the intended visual appearance.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for border radius usage patterns across the codebase
# to verify consistency with old specifications
# Check for any previous border radius definitions in git history
git log -p --all -S "tv-CascaderPanel-border-radius" -- "packages/theme/src/cascader-panel/vars.less"
# Check current usage of border radius variables across theme files
rg --type=less "tv-border-radius-(default|md)"
Length of output: 4380
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any references to the old specification or related changes
rg -i "old specification|old spec" --type md
# Check for any documentation about border radius standards
fd -e md -e txt | xargs rg -i "border.?radius"
# Check for any related component theme changes
rg --type=less "border-radius-(default|md|normal)" -B1 -A1
Length of output: 12340
packages/theme/src/upload/vars.less (2)
23-23: LGTM: Border radius update aligns with design system changes
The change to use var(--tv-border-radius-md) is consistent with similar updates across other components, contributing to a unified visual design.
Line range hint 1-33: Verify: Changes in upload component vs PR description
The PR description mentions adapting the treeMenu component, but this file modifies the upload component's styling. Please clarify if this change is intentionally part of the treeMenu adaptation or if it should be in a separate PR.
packages/theme/src/dialog-select/vars.less (2)
15-15: LGTM, but please verify specification alignment.
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md maintains the same fallback value (6px) while standardizing the variable naming convention. This aligns with similar changes across other components.
Let's verify this aligns with the design specifications:
✅ Verification successful
Border radius change is consistent with codebase-wide standardization
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md in DialogSelect aligns with a clear pattern across the codebase:
- All components consistently use
--tv-border-radius-mdwith a 6px fallback - The base theme defines
--tv-border-radius-md: 6pxas the default - The old theme specifically sets
--tv-border-radius-md: 2px, indicating proper support for legacy specifications
This change is part of a systematic standardization effort and correctly supports both new and old specifications through theme variables.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent border radius changes across components
# and any related design specification files
# Search for other border radius changes
rg --type=less "border-radius-(default|md)"
# Look for design specification files
fd -e md -e json -e yaml "spec|specification"
Length of output: 5716
15-15: Clarify relationship with treeMenu component.
This file is part of the dialog-select component, but the PR title mentions adapting the treeMenu component. Could you clarify how this change relates to the treeMenu adaptation mentioned in the PR title?
Let's check for related changes:
packages/theme/src/radio-button/vars.less (2)
17-17:
Verify alignment with PR objectives
The changes to medium sizes (--tv-border-radius-md and --tv-size-height-md) seem to contradict the PR objective of adapting to the "old specification". Please clarify if these changes are intentional or if they should maintain the default values to match the old specification.
Also applies to: 35-35
17-17: Verify consistency across components
The switch to medium sizes should be consistent across related components to maintain visual harmony.
Run the following script to check size variable usage across other components:
Also applies to: 35-35
✅ Verification successful
Border radius and height variables are consistently using medium size across components
The verification shows that the usage of --tv-border-radius-md and --tv-size-height-md is consistent across related components in the theme package:
- Border radius: Used consistently in form controls (Input, RadioButton, Checkbox), containers (ButtonGroup, Calendar) and interactive elements (Search, Grid)
- Height: Form elements and interactive components consistently use the medium height variable
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check size variable usage patterns across components
# Check for border radius usage patterns
echo "Border radius usage across components:"
rg --type less "border-radius: var\(--tv-(border-radius-default|border-radius-md)\)" packages/theme/src/
# Check for height variable usage patterns
echo "\nHeight variable usage across components:"
rg --type less "height: var\(--tv-(size-height-default|size-height-md)\)" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 5410
packages/theme/src/link-menu/vars.less (1)
25-25: Verify visual consistency with other components using medium sizes
The changes to height and border-radius properties align with the theme's standardization to medium sizes. However, we should ensure this maintains visual harmony with related components.
Let's verify the consistency of medium size usage across related components:
Also applies to: 33-33, 39-39
✅ Verification successful
Medium size usage is consistent across components
The changes to height and border-radius properties in the link-menu component align perfectly with the design system's standardization:
- The
--tv-size-height-md(32px) is consistently used across 40+ components including inputs, buttons, selects, and other form controls - The
--tv-border-radius-md(6px) is uniformly applied across 45+ components for their border radius properties
This standardization maintains visual harmony across the component library, particularly for interactive elements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of medium sizes across theme files
# Look for height-md and border-radius-md variables in other component themes
echo "Checking height-md usage:"
rg --type less "height-md" packages/theme/src/
echo "Checking border-radius-md usage:"
rg --type less "border-radius-md" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 9754
packages/theme/src/time-range/vars.less (1)
17-17: LGTM! Border radius update aligns with design system changes.
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md is consistent with similar updates across other components (Autocomplete, Cascader Panel, Transfer) while maintaining the same fallback value.
packages/theme/src/option/vars.less (1)
39-39: Verify alignment with old specification
The change from --tv-size-height-default to --tv-size-height-md appears to be moving to a new specification rather than reverting to an old one. Please verify if this aligns with the PR objective of adapting to the "old specification".
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the alignment with specifications:
Change aligns with standardization across components ✓
The switch to --tv-size-height-md is part of a consistent pattern across the entire component library. The search results show that:
- All major components (TreeMenu, Select, Tabs, etc.) use
--tv-size-height-md - The old specification in
old-theme.lessdefines--tv-size-height-mdas 28px - The new specification in
vars.lessdefines--tv-size-height-mdas 32px
This change is correctly implementing the old specification by:
- Using the standardized
mdsize variable instead ofdefault - Providing the explicit 32px fallback which matches the current specification
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for historical usage of height variables in the codebase
rg --type less "tv-size-height-(default|md)" -B 2 -A 2
# Search for any documentation about size specifications
fd -e md -e txt . -x grep -l "size specification"
Length of output: 15780
packages/theme/src/popeditor/vars.less (1)
25-25: Verify height consistency across components
The change from --tv-size-height-default to --tv-size-height-md appears to be part of a broader standardization effort. Let's verify this pattern across other components.
✅ Verification successful
Height variable usage is consistent across components
The verification confirms that --tv-size-height-md is consistently used as the default height across multiple components in the theme system, including:
- Base components (Input, Button, BaseSelect)
- Form components (FormItem, Select, Search)
- Navigation components (NavMenu, TreeMenu)
- Interactive components (Popeditor, Slider, Tabs)
The change in popeditor aligns with this system-wide standardization where --tv-size-height-md (32px) is defined as the default medium size in base/vars.less.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent height variable usage across components
# Expected: Should find similar changes in other component files
# Search for height-related variables in theme files
rg --type less "tv-size-height-(default|md)" packages/theme/src/
# Check for any remaining usage of tv-size-height-default
rg --type less "tv-size-height-default" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 4057
packages/theme/src/checkbox/vars.less (1)
41-41: Confirm the design system update
While the change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md is technically valid, please verify this is part of a deliberate design system update.
Run the following script to check for similar border radius changes across components:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the git log output, I can generate the final response as there is clear evidence of a deliberate design system update:
Border radius tokens have been systematically updated across components
The changes are part of a deliberate design system update where:
- The
--tv-border-radius-defaulttoken has been deprecated in favor of using--tv-border-radius-mddirectly - This change has been consistently applied across all components including:
- Autocomplete
- Button
- Calendar
- Cascader
- Checkbox
- ColorPicker
- DatePanel
- Dialog
- Dropdown
- Grid
- Input
- Menu
- Tabs
and many others
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent border radius changes across components
# Look for any other components that might need similar updates
# Search for border-radius-default usage
echo "Components still using border-radius-default:"
rg --type less "border-radius-default" packages/theme/src/
# Search for recent border-radius-md changes
echo -e "\nRecent border-radius-md changes:"
git log -p | rg -B 2 -A 2 "border-radius-md"
Length of output: 59029
packages/theme/src/form-item/vars.less (2)
31-31: LGTM: Height variable standardization
The change from --tv-size-height-default to --tv-size-height-md aligns with the broader initiative to standardize component heights across the theme, as seen in other files.
31-31: Verify if form-item changes are in scope
While the change follows the pattern of standardizing height variables to --tv-size-height-md, this file seems unrelated to the PR's objective of adapting the treeMenu component. Please confirm if this change was intentionally included in this PR.
packages/theme/src/time-panel/vars.less (2)
25-25: Border radius changes align with design system standardization
The changes from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md align with the broader effort to standardize border radius values across components. This maintains visual consistency in the design system.
Also applies to: 41-41
Line range hint 1-52: Verify if this file should be part of this PR
There appears to be a discrepancy between the PR objectives (which focus on tree menu changes) and this file (which contains time panel styles). Please verify if this file should be included in this PR.
Let's check for related changes and verify the PR scope:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can generate the final response:
The time-panel changes are part of a broader CSS variable update
The git diff shows this PR is updating CSS variables across multiple components (50+ files) including base styles, as indicated by the commit message "feat: update base css var". The time-panel changes are consistent with this broader scope of work.
Key observations:
- The PR modifies many
vars.lessfiles across different components - The base styles are being updated (
packages/theme/src/base/vars.less) - The changes follow a pattern of CSS variable standardization
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for tree menu related files and changes
# Look for tree menu related files
echo "Looking for tree menu related files..."
fd -t f "tree|menu" packages/theme/src/
# Check commit message and PR description
echo "Checking commit messages..."
git log --format=%B -n 1
# Look for other modified files in the PR
echo "Checking modified files..."
git diff --name-only HEAD~1
Length of output: 2676
packages/theme/src/fall-menu/vars.less (2)
51-51: LGTM: Border radius update aligns with theme standardization
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md is consistent with the broader theme updates standardizing border radius values across components.
Line range hint 1-51: Verify: PR objective vs. actual changes mismatch
The PR title and objective mention adapting the "treeMenu" component, but this file modifies the "fallMenu" component. Please clarify if:
- The PR title should be updated to reflect fallMenu changes
- There are missing treeMenu-related changes
- Both components are intentionally being modified
packages/theme/src/loading/vars.less (2)
32-32: Verify fullscreen loading icon size changes across components
The change from default to md size for fullscreen loading icons should be verified for visual consistency with other components using these variables.
Also applies to: 39-39
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the fullscreen loading variables specifically, as the previous search didn't show those results.
Fullscreen loading size changes are self-contained and consistent
The changes to the fullscreen loading icon sizes are localized within the loading component itself. The variables are:
- Only defined in
packages/theme/src/loading/vars.less - Only used in
packages/theme/src/loading/index.less - Follow the same sizing pattern as the spinner loading variables
- Maintain consistent sizing across small (icon-size), medium (xs), and large (md) variants
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other components that might be affected by the fullscreen loading size changes
# Search for any references to the fullscreen loading size variables
rg --type=less "tv-Loading-fullscreen-(large|medium|small)-(width|height)"
# Search for other components that switched from default to md size
rg --type=less "tv-size-height-(default|md)"
Length of output: 1636
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search specifically for fullscreen loading variables
rg --type=less "tv-Loading-fullscreen"
# Also search for any usage of these variables in the codebase
rg --type=less "var\(--tv-Loading-fullscreen"
Length of output: 1897
46-46: Verify spinner loading icon size changes across components
The change from default to md size for spinner loading icons should be verified for visual consistency with other components using these variables.
Also applies to: 53-53
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the usage of these loading spinner variables and their relationship with other components.
Loading spinner size changes are consistent with design system
The change from default to md size maintains consistency as:
- The loading spinner variables are only used within the loading component itself
- The
--tv-size-height-md(32px) is the standard medium size used across many components in the design system - The size hierarchy (small, medium, large) is maintained with proper scaling
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other components that might be affected by the spinner loading size changes
# Search for any references to the spinner loading size variables
rg --type=less "tv-Loading-spinner-(large|medium|small)-(width|height)"
# Check if this change aligns with the old specification mentioned in PR objectives
rg --type=less -B2 -A2 "tv-Loading-spinner-large" packages/theme/src/loading/vars.less
Length of output: 1636
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any other components that might be importing or using the loading component
rg --type=less "@import.*loading"
# Look for any direct usage of the Loading component in other less files
rg --type=less "\.tv-Loading"
# Check the actual values of the size variables being used
rg --type=less "tv-size-height-(xs|md)"
Length of output: 7202
packages/theme/src/selected-box/vars.less (1)
Line range hint 1-52: Verify relationship with treeMenu component.
While this change looks correct, the PR objective mentions adapting the treeMenu component, but this file modifies the SelectedBox component.
Let's verify the relationship between these components:
packages/theme/src/select/vars.less (1)
31-31: Height variables standardized to medium size specification
The changes align with the broader effort to standardize component heights using the medium size specification while maintaining the same fallback values. This maintains consistency across the component library.
Also applies to: 40-40
packages/theme/src/checkbox-button/vars.less (2)
35-35: LGTM: Border radius standardization
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md aligns with the broader effort to standardize border radius values across components.
35-35: Verify if this change is within PR scope
While the border radius update aligns with the broader theme standardization effort, it appears unrelated to the PR's stated objective of adapting the treeMenu component. Please clarify if this change was intentional or if it should be moved to a separate PR.
✅ Verification successful
Border radius change is part of design system standardization
The change to --tv-CheckboxButton-border-radius is consistent with a broader design system standardization effort, as evidenced by:
- The
border-radius-md(6px) is widely used across 40+ components as their default border radius - Recent commits show border radius standardization changes (e.g. PR fix(tag): update tag's padding,border-radius #2458 for tag component)
- The change aligns with the design system's base variable definition in
base/vars.lesswhich sets--tv-border-radius-md: 6pxas the default radius
While this change wasn't explicitly mentioned in the PR description focused on treeMenu, it's part of the ongoing design system standardization and should be retained.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if this change is part of a broader standardization effort
# or if it's an unintended modification
# Look for related border-radius changes in tree-menu files
rg -l "border-radius" | grep -i "tree"
# Check for other border-radius standardization changes
rg --type=less "border-radius-default.*border-radius-md"
Length of output: 204
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of these files to understand the border-radius context
echo "=== Tree Menu Border Radius ==="
rg "border-radius" packages/theme/src/tree-menu/index.less -B1 -A1
echo -e "\n=== Tree Border Radius ==="
rg "border-radius" packages/theme/src/tree/vars.less -B1 -A1
rg "border-radius" packages/theme/src/tree/index.less -B1 -A1
echo -e "\n=== Checking for other recent border-radius changes ==="
git log -p --grep="border-radius" --since="1 month ago"
echo -e "\n=== Looking for border-radius-md usage ==="
rg "border-radius-md" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 28758
packages/theme/src/ip-address/vars.less (3)
15-15: LGTM: Height variable update aligns with component standardization.
The change from --tv-size-height-default to --tv-size-height-md is consistent with the broader effort to standardize component dimensions across the theme.
35-35: LGTM: Border radius update maintains visual consistency.
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md maintains visual consistency with other components being updated in this PR.
53-53: Verify the cascading impact of the height calculation change.
The default height calculation now uses --tv-size-height-md as its base, which is consistent with the normal height change. However, we should verify this doesn't create unexpected visual discrepancies with other form components.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the height calculations to better understand the impact.
Let me check for other form components to compare their height calculations.
Let me check for other form components' height variables to ensure consistency.
Let me check for any other form components that might share similar sizing patterns.
Height calculation is consistent with form component patterns
The height calculation using calc(var(--tv-size-height-md) - 2px) for the default size is consistent with the component design system. Other form components like Input, ColorPicker, CheckboxButton, and ButtonGroup use the base --tv-size-height-* variables directly, while IpAddress subtracts 2px to maintain visual harmony. This slight reduction is a specific design choice for the IpAddress component and doesn't create inconsistencies with other form components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other components that might be affected by this height change
# Look for other components using similar height calculations
# Search for height calculations in theme files
rg -l "calc\(.*tv-size-height.*\)" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 134
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the actual height calculation patterns
rg "calc\(.*tv-size-height.*\)" packages/theme/src/ -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 17529
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for height-related variables in other form components
rg "height: calc\(.*tv-size-height.*\)|--.*height.*:.*calc\(.*tv-size-height.*\)" packages/theme/src/ -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 17445
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for height-related variables in other form components
fd . packages/theme/src/ -t f -e less | xargs rg "height.*:.*calc\(.*tv-size-height.*\)" --no-filename
Length of output: 382
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for other form components' size variables
fd . packages/theme/src/ -t f -e less | xargs rg "^[[:space:]]*--.*-(default|medium|small|mini)-(height|size)" --no-filename
Length of output: 1915
packages/theme/src/radio/vars.less (2)
19-19: Verify border radius consistency across components
The border radius has been updated from default to md. While this aligns with the AI summary indicating similar changes across other components, we should ensure this maintains visual consistency.
✅ Verification successful
Border radius update is consistent with design system
The verification shows that --tv-border-radius-md is widely used across the component library as the default border radius value. The change from default to md in the Radio component aligns with the established pattern:
- The base theme defines
--tv-border-radius-md: 6pxas the default radius - Over 40 components consistently use
--tv-border-radius-md - Only the mobile theme uses a different border radius pattern, which is expected
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other components are consistently using --tv-border-radius-md
# Search for any remaining usage of border-radius-default
echo "Checking for components still using default border radius..."
rg "border-radius-default" --type=less
# Search for components using medium border radius
echo "Checking for components using medium border radius..."
rg "border-radius-md" --type=less
Length of output: 5943
19-19: Verify if this radio component change is related to tree-menu adaptation
This change modifies the radio component's border radius, but the PR description indicates that changes should be focused on adapting the tree-menu component. Please clarify if this modification is intentional and how it relates to the tree-menu adaptation mentioned in the PR title.
packages/theme/src/dropdown-item/vars.less (1)
52-52: Verify integration with treeMenu component
The height variable change from --tv-size-height-default to --tv-size-height-md might affect the treeMenu component mentioned in the PR objectives.
✅ Verification successful
Height variable change aligns with treeMenu's existing configuration
The verification shows that treeMenu already uses --tv-size-height-md for its node height (--tv-TreeMenu-node-height: var(--tv-size-height-md)), making this dropdown-item height change consistent with the existing implementation. This alignment supports the PR's objective of adapting the treeMenu component to specifications.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any dependencies on the old height variable in treeMenu
rg --type=less "tv-size-height-default" "packages/theme/src/tree-menu/"
# Check for height-related variables in treeMenu
rg --type=less "height" "packages/theme/src/tree-menu/"
Length of output: 1074
packages/theme/src/base-select/vars.less (2)
Line range hint 1-63: Verify if this file should be part of the tree menu changes.
This file (base-select/vars.less) contains BaseSelect component styling, but the PR objectives mention adapting the tree menu component. Please verify if this file should be included in this PR.
Let's check for tree menu related files that might be missing:
48-48: Height standardization changes look consistent.
The changes to standardize both input and tags height to medium size (--tv-size-height-md) are consistent with each other and align with the broader theme standardization effort mentioned in the summary.
Let's verify if this height standardization is consistent across related components:
Also applies to: 53-53
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the height standardization across related components with another search to specifically look for height variables:
Height standardization is consistent across components
The changes to standardize BaseSelect's input and tags height to --tv-size-height-md (32px) are consistent with the broader theme standardization. The search results show that numerous components in the theme package use the same height variable:
- Form controls: Input, Select, BaseSelect, Numeric, etc.
- Interactive elements: Button, ButtonGroup, Option, etc.
- Navigation components: Tabs, NavMenu, TreeMenu, etc.
- Data components: Grid, Transfer, Tree, etc.
This standardization ensures a consistent UI height across the component library.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent height variable usage across related components
# Search for height-related CSS variable declarations
rg --type less "height.*:(.*)(default|md)" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 47717
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for height-related CSS variable declarations in theme packages
rg --type less "height:.*var\(--tv-size-height-md|height:.*32px" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 6748
packages/theme/src/calendar/vars.less (1)
39-39: LGTM! Border radius updates align with theme standardization.
The changes to use --tv-border-radius-md for both selected elements and input elements are consistent with the broader theme updates mentioned in the summary.
Also applies to: 41-41
packages/theme/src/textarea/vars.less (1)
25-25: LGTM! Changes align with design system consistency.
The updates to use medium-sized variants (md) for height and border-radius maintain consistency with other components in the theme.
Let's verify the visual consistency across components:
Also applies to: 27-27, 59-59
✅ Verification successful
Changes are consistent with the design system's medium-sized variants
The verification confirms that the textarea component's use of medium-sized variants (--tv-size-height-md and --tv-border-radius-md) aligns perfectly with the design system's patterns:
- Height: 34 other components use the same
--tv-size-height-mdvariable - Border radius: 45 other components use the same
--tv-border-radius-mdvariable
This demonstrates strong design system consistency across the component library.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other components are using the same medium-sized variants
# Search for height variables using medium size
echo "Components using medium height:"
rg --type less "height.*tv-size-height-md" packages/theme/src/
# Search for border-radius variables using medium size
echo "Components using medium border-radius:"
rg --type less "border-radius.*tv-border-radius-md" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 8827
packages/theme/src/search/vars.less (3)
65-65: Verify list height consistency with other dropdown components.
The selector list height change should be consistent with other dropdown/list components in the system.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
List height is consistently set to medium size across dropdown components
The change to use --tv-size-height-md for the search selector list height aligns with other similar components in the codebase:
- Roles poplist:
--tv-Roles-poplist-item-height: var(--tv-size-height-md) - TallStorage:
--tv-TallStorage-item-height: var(--tv-size-height-md) - Tabs header:
--tv-Tabs-header-separator-item-height: var(--tv-size-height-md, 32px)
Other dropdown components like Cascader, Transfer, and Pager also use the equivalent fixed value of 32px, which is the default value for --tv-size-height-md.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check list height consistency across dropdown components
# Look for height variables in dropdown-related components
# Search for list height variables in theme files
rg --type=less "list-height|item-height" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 3170
17-17: Verify the height change impact on search component layout.
The change from default to medium height could affect the component's vertical alignment within its container and with adjacent components.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the usage of this height variable and its consistency with other components.
Height change aligns with design system standards
The change to use var(--tv-size-height-md) for the search input height is consistent with the design system's standardization. The search component follows the same height variable used by many other form components in the codebase, including:
- Input (
--tv-Input-height) - Select (
--tv-Select-height) - Button (
--tv-Button-height) - Form items (
--tv-FormItem-height)
The value of --tv-size-height-md is defined in base/vars.less as 32px, which is the standard medium size for form controls in this design system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent height usage across related components
# Look for other components that might need similar height adjustments
# Search for height-related variables in theme files
rg --type=less "height.*default|height.*md" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 3170
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for height-related variables in search component and its dependencies
rg --type=less -C3 "tv-Search-input-height|tv-size-height-md" packages/theme/src/
# Search for any references to search input height in component files
rg -t ts -t vue "tv-Search-input-height" .
Length of output: 24498
25-25: Verify border radius consistency across components.
The border radius changes for both input and selector maintain internal consistency, but we should ensure this aligns with other components in the system.
Also applies to: 55-55
✅ Verification successful
Border radius changes are consistent with design system
Based on the comprehensive analysis of border radius usage across the codebase:
-
The change to
--tv-border-radius-md(6px) for Search component's input and selector is consistent with:- Other form controls (Input, Textarea, Select, etc.)
- Dialog and modal components
- Navigation elements (Tabs, Menu)
- Interactive components (Button, Checkbox, Radio)
-
The codebase shows a clear pattern of using the medium border radius (
--tv-border-radius-md) as the default for most interactive elements, defined inbase/vars.lessas 6px. -
The change aligns with the design system's border radius scale:
--tv-border-radius-xs: 2px; --tv-border-radius-sm: 4px; --tv-border-radius-md: 6px; // default --tv-border-radius-lg: 8px;
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check border radius consistency across components
# Look for any components still using default border radius
# Search for border radius variables in theme files
rg --type=less "border-radius.*(default|md)" packages/theme/src/
# Check if any components mix default and medium border radius
rg --type=less -C2 "border-radius.*default.*border-radius.*md" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 3170
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check border radius usage
# Search for border-radius CSS variable definitions
rg --type=less "^[^/]*--.*border-radius" packages/theme/src/
# Search for border-radius usage in component styles
rg --type=less "border-radius:" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 66503
packages/theme/src/date-panel/vars.less (1)
31-31: LGTM! Consistent with theme standardization.
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md aligns with the broader theme updates while maintaining the same fallback value.
Let's verify consistency across other component theme files:
✅ Verification successful
Border radius standardization verified across theme components
The verification confirms consistent usage of --tv-border-radius-md across all theme components, with many components also maintaining the same fallback value of 6px. The DatePanel's border radius implementation aligns perfectly with this standardized approach.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check border radius variable usage across theme files
# Expected: Consistent usage of --tv-border-radius-md
# Search for border-radius variable declarations in theme files
rg --type less "border-radius:.+(?:default|md)" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 4803
packages/theme/src/input/vars.less (3)
24-24: Verify the height change impact across components
The change from --tv-size-height-default to --tv-size-height-md aligns with the broader standardization effort, but we should ensure this maintains visual consistency with related components.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response:
Height change to --tv-size-height-md is consistent with component ecosystem
The change from --tv-size-height-default to --tv-size-height-md is verified to be safe and aligned with the component ecosystem:
- No remaining references to
--tv-size-height-defaultwere found - The
--tv-size-height-mdvalue is consistently used as the default height across many components including Button, Select, Search, Pager, and others - The change maintains visual consistency as it follows the established pattern where medium (
md) size is the base default
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usage of --tv-size-height-default and verify consistent height variable usage across components
# Check for any remaining references to the old variable
echo "Checking for remaining --tv-size-height-default references:"
rg --type=less "tv-size-height-default"
# Check height variable usage patterns in other components
echo "Checking height variable usage patterns:"
rg --type=less "height: var\(--tv-size-height-[^)]+\)"
Length of output: 7080
26-26: Verify the border radius change impact across components
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md should be verified for visual consistency across all form components.
✅ Verification successful
Border radius change is consistent with design system
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md aligns with the existing design system, as evidenced by:
- No remaining usage of
--tv-border-radius-defaultin the codebase - Consistent usage of
--tv-border-radius-mdacross form and input-like components:- Input:
--tv-Input-border-radius: var(--tv-border-radius-md) - Textarea:
--tv-Textarea-border-radius: var(--tv-border-radius-md) - Search:
--tv-Search-input-border-radius: var(--tv-border-radius-md) - DialogSelect:
--tv-DialogSelect-border-radius: var(--tv-border-radius-md) - Grid inputs:
--tv-Grid-input-border-radius: var(--tv-border-radius-md)
- Input:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usage of --tv-border-radius-default and verify consistent border radius usage across components
# Check for any remaining references to the old variable
echo "Checking for remaining --tv-border-radius-default references:"
rg --type=less "tv-border-radius-default"
# Check border radius variable usage patterns in other components
echo "Checking border radius variable usage patterns:"
rg --type=less "border-radius: var\(--tv-border-radius-[^)]+\)"
Length of output: 10432
24-26: Clarify the relationship between input and tree-menu components
The PR objectives mention adapting the tree-menu component, but these changes are in the input component's styles. Please clarify:
- How do these input component changes relate to the tree-menu adaptation?
- Are these changes intentional as part of the tree-menu modifications?
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the relationship between these components.
Let me check the index files and style imports to understand the complete picture.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
Input style changes are related to tree-menu's search functionality
The changes to input variables are justified as the tree-menu component uses these shared design tokens:
- Both components use the same height token
--tv-size-height-md - Tree-menu's vars.less shows input-related styling with comments like "输入框下面的线" and "输入框距离左边的距离"
- The tree-menu component appears to have an integrated input field for filtering/searching, making these input style changes relevant to the tree-menu adaptation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for relationships between tree-menu and input components
# Check for input component usage in tree-menu
echo "Checking for input component usage in tree-menu:"
rg --type=vue "Input" "packages/theme/src/tree-menu/"
# Check for shared variables between input and tree-menu
echo "Checking for shared variables:"
rg --type=less "(tv-size-height-|tv-border-radius-)" "packages/theme/src/tree-menu/"
Length of output: 436
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Vue files in tree-menu directory with a different approach
echo "Checking tree-menu Vue files:"
fd ".vue$" "packages/theme/src/tree-menu"
# Check the actual content of tree-menu Vue files for Input usage
echo -e "\nChecking Input usage in tree-menu files:"
rg "Input" "packages/theme/src/tree-menu"
# Check if input vars are imported in tree-menu
echo -e "\nChecking for input vars imports:"
rg "input/vars" "packages/theme/src/tree-menu"
# Check tree-menu implementation to understand its structure
echo -e "\nChecking tree-menu vars content:"
cat packages/theme/src/tree-menu/vars.less
Length of output: 2562
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check tree-menu's index and style files
echo "Checking tree-menu index files:"
fd "index" "packages/theme/src/tree-menu"
# Check main theme file for imports
echo -e "\nChecking main theme file for imports:"
cat packages/theme/src/index.less
# Check if tree-menu has a search/filter feature
echo -e "\nChecking for search/filter related code:"
rg -i "search|filter" "packages/theme/src/tree-menu"
Length of output: 5767
packages/theme/src/button-group/vars.less (3)
15-15: LGTM: Border radius update aligns with design system changes.
The change from default to md border radius is consistent with the broader design system updates mentioned in the PR.
25-25: LGTM: Height variable update matches design system changes.
The change from default to md height maintains consistency with other component updates in this PR.
Line range hint 1-67: Verify the scope of component changes.
While these button-group changes look correct, the PR title specifically mentions treeMenu component adaptations. Let's verify if these button-group changes are intentional and related to the treeMenu updates.
packages/theme/src/slider/vars.less (1)
59-59: LGTM! Height standardization aligns with design system.
The update from --tv-size-height-default to --tv-size-height-md aligns with the broader effort to standardize component heights across the UI system.
Let's verify this standardization across other components:
✅ Verification successful
Height standardization verified across components ✓
The change to use --tv-size-height-md for the Slider's input height is consistent with the design system's standardization. The verification shows this same variable being used across 35+ component definitions including inputs, buttons, selects, and other interactive elements, confirming this is the correct height token for standard UI components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify height variable consistency across components
# Expected: Find other components using --tv-size-height-md for consistency
# Search for height variable definitions in theme files
rg --type less "height:.+(?:default|md)" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 3610
packages/theme/src/milestone/vars.less (2)
27-27: Height variable change follows established pattern
The change from --tv-size-height-default to --tv-size-height-md aligns with similar updates across other components while maintaining the same fallback value of 32px.
27-27: Verify relevance to tree-menu changes
This change in the milestone component's variables appears unrelated to the PR's stated objective of adapting the tree-menu component. Please clarify why this modification is included in this PR.
packages/theme/src/date-table/vars.less (1)
82-82: Height variable standardization looks good.
The change from --tv-size-height-default to --tv-size-height-md aligns with the broader effort to standardize component dimensions across the theme. The fallback value remains at 32px, maintaining backward compatibility.
Let's verify this standardization pattern across other components:
✅ Verification successful
Height variable standardization is consistent across components
The codebase shows a consistent pattern of using --tv-size-height-md (32px) as the default height for most UI components, including:
- Form controls (Input, Select, TextArea, etc.)
- Navigation elements (TreeMenu, NavMenu)
- Interactive components (Button, ButtonGroup)
- Data display components (Grid, Table)
- Layout components (DateTable, FormItem)
The change from --tv-size-height-default to --tv-size-height-md in DateTable aligns with this standardization pattern and maintains the same 32px height value.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of height variables across components
# Expected: Pattern of migration from default to md size variants
# Search for height-related CSS variable declarations
rg --type less -B 1 -A 1 'height: var\(--tv-(size-height|.*-height)'
# Search for specific size variants
rg --type less 'var\(--tv-size-height-(default|md)'
Length of output: 91752
packages/theme/src/nav-menu/vars.less (2)
51-51: LGTM! Verify visual alignment with other components.
The change to var(--tv-size-height-md) aligns with the standardization effort across components.
Let's verify this standardization across other components:
✅ Verification successful
Height standardization verified across components
The change to var(--tv-size-height-md) for --tv-NavMenu-popmenu-text-height is consistent with the design system's standardization. The variable is widely used across 25+ components including buttons, inputs, selects, and other interactive elements, ensuring a cohesive vertical rhythm throughout the UI.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other components are using the same height variable
# This helps ensure consistent vertical sizing across the theme
rg --type less "tv-size-height-md" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 3985
73-73: LGTM! Verify border radius consistency.
The change to var(--tv-border-radius-md) maintains consistency with the theme's border radius specifications.
Let's verify border radius consistency across components:
✅ Verification successful
Border radius usage is consistent across components
The verification confirms that --tv-border-radius-md is consistently used across the theme's components for medium border radius styling. The change in nav-menu/vars.less aligns with the established pattern where this variable is used for container and panel-like elements (e.g., dropdowns, panels, boxes).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check border radius usage across components
# This helps ensure consistent styling across the theme
rg --type less "tv-border-radius-md" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 5457
packages/theme/src/numeric/vars.less (3)
17-17: Verify the height change impact on Numeric input component.
The height variable has been changed from default to medium size. While this aligns with the broader theme updates mentioned in the summary, please verify that this change:
- Maintains visual consistency with other form components
- Doesn't introduce any layout shifts in existing implementations
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that --tv-size-height-md is consistently used across many form and interactive components in the codebase, including FormItem, Select, Input, Button, and others. This indicates a design system standardization where components share the same height variable for visual consistency.
Height change aligns with design system standards
The change to use --tv-size-height-md for the Numeric input component maintains consistency with other form components in the codebase, as evidenced by:
- Form components like Input, Select, and FormItem all use
--tv-size-height-md - Interactive elements like Button and Option also share this height variable
- The change follows the design system's standardization of component heights
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components that might be affected by this height change
rg --type=less "tv-size-height-default|tv-size-height-md" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 15741
Line range hint 1-85: Clarify the scope of changes in relation to PR objectives.
The PR objective mentions adapting the tree-menu component to the old specification, but this file modifies the Numeric input component's styling. While these changes align with the broader theme updates mentioned in the summary, please clarify:
- Whether these changes are intentional as part of the tree-menu adaptation
- If they should be in a separate PR focused on theme standardization
#!/bin/bash
# Search for related tree-menu changes to understand the scope
rg --type=less "tree-menu" -B 2 -A 2
# Check commit message to understand if this was intentionally included
git log -p packages/theme/src/numeric/vars.less19-19: Verify the border radius change impact on Numeric input component.
The border radius has been changed from default to medium size. While this aligns with the broader theme updates, please verify that this change:
- Maintains visual consistency with adjacent components
- Matches the intended "old specification" mentioned in the PR objectives
✅ Verification successful
Border radius change aligns with old theme specification and maintains visual consistency
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md (both 6px) for the Numeric input component is consistent with:
- The old theme specification which uses 2px-6px border radius values as shown in
packages/theme/src/base/old-theme.less - Other form components like Input, Search, Cascader, etc. that use
--tv-border-radius-mdfor their input fields - The broader theme update objectives to standardize border radius values
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components that might be affected by this border radius change
rg --type=less "tv-border-radius-default|tv-border-radius-md" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 45674
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using border radius variables to check visual consistency
rg --type=less "border-radius|border-radius-md|border-radius-default" -B 2 -A 2
# Search for any references to "old specification" in PRs and docs
rg -g "*.md" "old specification|old theme|old vars"
Length of output: 211761
packages/theme/src/pager/vars.less (3)
93-93: Verify height consistency within the pager component
The input height should harmonize with the main pager height (--tv-Pager-height) set on line 43. Both are now using --tv-size-height-md, which maintains internal consistency.
43-43: Verify visual consistency with related components
The change from --tv-size-height-default to --tv-size-height-md might affect the component's vertical alignment with adjacent elements.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using default height to ensure consistency
rg --type=less "height: var\(--tv-size-height-default\)" packages/theme/src/91-91: Verify border-radius consistency with other input elements
The change to --tv-border-radius-md should maintain visual consistency with other form inputs in the system.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a broader search to understand the border-radius usage patterns in the theme system.
Border radius change is consistent with design system
The change to --tv-border-radius-md for the Pager input is consistent with the broader design system. The search results show that:
- Most form inputs use
--tv-border-radius-mdincluding Search, Input, Numeric, and Grid inputs - This is part of a consistent pattern where medium border radius is used for interactive elements
- The base theme defines
--tv-border-radius-mdas 6px by default
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other input elements' border-radius to ensure consistency
rg --type=less "input.*border-radius: var\(--tv-border-radius-" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for border-radius usage in input-related styles with more context
rg --type=less -A 2 -B 2 "input.*border-radius|--tv-.*input.*border-radius" packages/theme/src/
# Search for border-radius variables in theme files
rg --type=less "border-radius-md" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 13932
packages/theme/src/wizard/vars.less (1)
23-23: LGTM! Verify consistency across components.
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md aligns with the standardization effort mentioned in the summary.
Let's verify if this border radius update is consistently applied across other components:
✅ Verification successful
Border radius standardization is consistently applied
The verification shows that --tv-border-radius-md is consistently used across all components in the theme system, with many components using the same fallback value of 6px. This change in the Wizard component aligns perfectly with the established pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent border radius variable usage across components
# Expected: Should see similar changes from default to md in other component files
# Search for border-radius variables in theme files
rg --type=less "border-radius-(default|md)" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 5466
packages/theme/src/tabs/vars.less (4)
35-35: LGTM: Consistent border radius updates
The border radius variables have been consistently updated to use the medium size specification (--tv-border-radius-md) with appropriate fallback values.
Also applies to: 81-81
49-49: LGTM: Height variable standardization
The separator item height has been appropriately standardized to use the medium height specification (--tv-size-height-md).
163-163: LGTM: Consistent button card styling
The button card height and border radius have been properly updated to use medium size specifications, maintaining consistency with other components.
Also applies to: 171-171
Line range hint 35-171: Verify consistency across theme files
While the changes look good, let's verify that these medium-size specifications are consistently applied across other theme files.
✅ Verification successful
Border radius and height variables are consistently applied across theme files
The verification results show that:
- The
border-radius-mdvariable is consistently used across 47 theme files, including the tabs component - The
size-height-mdvariable is consistently used across 39 theme files, including the tabs component - Both variables are properly defined in the base theme files (
old-theme.lessandvars.less) - The changes in the tabs component align with the global theme system
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency of medium size specifications across theme files
# Search for border radius and height variables in theme files
echo "Checking border radius usage:"
rg --type=less "border-radius-md" "packages/theme/src/"
echo -e "\nChecking height variable usage:"
rg --type=less "size-height-md" "packages/theme/src/"
Length of output: 9771
packages/theme/src/tag/vars.less (1)
70-70: LGTM! Verify consistent border radius usage across components.
The change from var(--tv-border-radius-default) to var(--tv-border-radius-md) aligns with the standardization effort across components and matches the old specification.
Let's verify the consistent usage of border radius variables across components:
✅ Verification successful
Border radius standardization verified across components
The codebase shows consistent usage of var(--tv-border-radius-md) across all components, including the updated Tag component. The change aligns with the established pattern where:
- All medium-sized components use
--tv-border-radius-md - The base variable is defined in
base/vars.lesswith a default value of 6px - An alternative value of 2px is provided in
old-theme.lessfor backward compatibility
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of border radius variables across components
# Expected: All medium-sized components should use --tv-border-radius-md
# Search for border radius variables in theme files
rg --type less "border-radius-(?:medium|md)" packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 5467
packages/theme/src/grid/vars.less (2)
164-164: Height property standardized to medium size
The input height has been updated to use var(--tv-size-height-md), maintaining consistency with the border radius changes and aligning with the old specification.
Let's verify the consistency of height variables:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information to verify the height variable standardization:
Height variable standardization is consistent
The change to use var(--tv-size-height-md) for Grid input height aligns with the codebase's standardization pattern. The search results confirm:
- The base theme defines
--tv-size-height-mdas 32px - Multiple components consistently use
--tv-size-height-mdfor their height properties - No instances of
size-height-defaultwere found in Grid-related files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining default height usage in Grid-related files
# and verify the value of --tv-size-height-md
# Check for any remaining default height in Grid files
rg "size-height-default" "packages/theme/src/grid/"
# Check the value of md height
rg "tv-size-height-md" "packages/theme/"
Length of output: 20566
137-137: Consistent update of border radius properties to medium size
The border radius properties for filter input, toolbar button icon, and input have been standardized to use var(--tv-border-radius-md). This change aligns with the PR objective of adapting components to the old specification.
Let's verify the consistency of these changes across the codebase:
Also applies to: 150-150, 166-166
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can make a definitive conclusion. The changes to use var(--tv-border-radius-md) for border radius properties in the Grid component are consistent with the codebase-wide pattern. Key observations:
- No instances of
border-radius-defaultwere found in Grid-related files - The
--tv-border-radius-mdvariable is widely used across many components for border radius properties - The base theme defines
--tv-border-radius-md: 6pxas the default value - The old theme also uses this variable but with a different value (2px)
Border radius changes are consistent with component design system
The standardization of border radius properties to use var(--tv-border-radius-md) in the Grid component aligns with the established pattern across the component library. This change maintains visual consistency with other components that use the same variable.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining default border radius usage in Grid-related files
# and verify the value of --tv-border-radius-md
# Check for any remaining default border radius in Grid files
rg "border-radius-default" "packages/theme/src/grid/"
# Check the value of md border radius
rg "tv-border-radius-md" "packages/theme/"
Length of output: 22040
packages/theme/src/transfer/vars.less (1)
77-77: LGTM! Changes align with design system standardization.
The updates to use --tv-border-radius-md for both panel and filter border radius maintain visual consistency across components while preserving backward compatibility through identical fallback values.
Also applies to: 91-91
packages/theme/src/steps/vars.less (1)
25-25: LGTM! Consistent with design system standardization.
The changes align with the broader effort to standardize sizing variables across components by transitioning from --tv-size-height-default to --tv-size-height-md. Both variables maintain the same fallback value of 32px, ensuring backward compatibility.
Let's verify this standardization pattern across other components:
Also applies to: 36-36
✅ Verification successful
Standardization pattern verified across components
The search results confirm that --tv-size-height-md is consistently used as the default height variable across multiple components in the theme package, with a standard value of 32px defined in base/vars.less. The changes to Steps component align with this established pattern, as evidenced by similar usage in:
- Form controls: Input, Select, Textarea, Search
- Navigation: TreeMenu, NavMenu, Tabs
- Interactive elements: Button, ButtonGroup, Option
- Complex components: Grid, DateTable, Pager
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistent use of --tv-size-height-md across components
# Expected: Find similar transitions in other component theme files
rg --type=less -g 'packages/theme/src/**/vars.less' \
-A 1 -B 1 \
'(--tv-size-height-default|--tv-size-height-md)'
Length of output: 8226
packages/theme/src/button/vars.less (2)
313-313: Icon-only button border radius updated for consistency.
The change to --tv-border-radius-md maintains visual consistency with other component updates in this PR, particularly matching the medium-sized specifications seen across the theme.
33-33: Default button height standardized to medium size.
The change from --tv-size-height-default to --tv-size-height-md aligns with the PR objective of adapting to the old specification.
Let's verify the impact of this change on other components that might depend on the default button height:
✅ Verification successful
The button height change is safe and properly scoped
The change to --tv-Button-height is only used within the button component itself for:
- Setting the button's dimensions (width and height)
- Calculating the icon size (with an 8px reduction)
No other components directly depend on this variable, making this a safe, self-contained change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find components that reference the button height variable
# This helps identify potential visual inconsistencies
rg --type=less -l "tv-Button-height[^-]"
Length of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage of the button height variable in the index.less file
rg -A 3 "tv-Button-height" packages/theme/src/button/index.less
Length of output: 461
packages/theme/src/base/vars.less (1)
393-393: LGTM! Verify component usage of the new brand border radius variable.
The introduction of --tv-border-radius-brand variable is a good practice for maintaining consistent border radius values across brand-related components.
Let's verify which components might be affected by this new variable:
✅ Verification successful
The new brand border radius variable is correctly integrated and used
The verification shows that the new --tv-border-radius-brand variable is already being used appropriately in:
- Button component (
packages/theme/src/button/vars.less) as the default border radius - Pager component (
packages/theme/src/pager/vars.less) for page items - The variable replaces an older definition in
old-theme.lessthat used--tv-border-radius-md
The implementation is consistent with the intended usage for buttons and pagination components as mentioned in the variable's comment.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find potential usage of the new border radius variable in component styles
# Search for any potential references to brand border radius
rg -l "border-radius.*brand|border-radius:.*round" --type less
# Search for button and pagination components that might need to use this variable
rg -l "border-radius" --type less packages/theme/src/(button|pagination)
Length of output: 964
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to search for border-radius usage in button and pagination components
rg -l "border-radius" packages/theme/src/button/
rg -l "border-radius" packages/theme/src/pagination/
# Also search for any direct usage of the new variable
rg "tv-border-radius-brand" --type less
# Let's also check the content of button styles to see current border-radius implementation
rg "border-radius" -A 2 -B 2 packages/theme/src/button/
Length of output: 4536
| @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ | |||
| // 拖拽上传框边框色 | |||
| --tv-UploadDragger-border-color: var(--tv-color-border); | |||
| // 拖拽上传框圆角 | |||
| --tv-UploadDragger-border-radius: var(--tv-border-radius-default); | |||
| --tv-UploadDragger-border-radius: var(--tv-border-radius-md); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
This change appears to be misplaced in this PR
Based on the verification results:
- No tree-menu related changes were found in the current PR
- The upload-dragger component change is isolated and appears unrelated to tree-menu adaptations
- The PR context and the file modification don't align in purpose
This border-radius modification should be moved to a separate PR focused on design system standardization, as it's unrelated to the stated objective of adapting the treeMenu component to old specifications.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify if this change belongs in this PR
This change to the upload-dragger component's border radius appears unrelated to the PR's stated objective of adapting the treeMenu component to old specifications. Please clarify if this change should be part of a separate PR focused on standardizing border radius values across components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if this PR contains any tree-menu related changes that might justify including this upload-dragger change
# Expected: Find tree-menu related changes to validate PR scope
echo "Checking for tree-menu related files..."
fd -e vue -e less -e js tree-menu
echo "Checking for tree-menu related changes in git..."
git diff origin/main..HEAD | rg -i "tree-?menu"
Length of output: 706
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check the PR changes
# Check all modified files in the PR
git status --porcelain
# Look for any border-radius related changes
echo "Checking for border-radius changes..."
git diff | rg -i "border-radius"
# Check if there are other theme-related changes
echo "Checking theme package changes..."
fd . packages/theme -t f | xargs git diff -- 2>/dev/null
Length of output: 266
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try one more approach using GitHub CLI to get PR details and changes
# Get PR details
gh pr view --json files,title,body
# Get the specific file content to check context
cat packages/theme/src/upload-dragger/vars.less
# Check for any related component changes
fd . packages/theme/src -t f | grep -i "border-radius"
Length of output: 1556
| @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ | |||
| --tv-SelectDropdown-icon-color-static: var(--tv-color-icon-control, #191919); | |||
|
|
|||
| // 下拉框圆角 | |||
| --tv-SelectDropdown-border-radius: var(--tv-border-radius-default, 6px); | |||
| --tv-SelectDropdown-border-radius: var(--tv-border-radius-md, 6px); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Border radius fallback values need to be updated for consistency
The verification reveals inconsistencies in border radius fallback values across the theme:
old-theme.lessdefines--tv-border-radius-mdas2px- Multiple components, including SelectDropdown, are using
6pxas fallback value - This creates a discrepancy where the fallback doesn't match the intended value
Please update the following files to use 2px as the fallback value to maintain consistency with old-theme.less:
packages/theme/src/select-dropdown/vars.lesspackages/theme/src/transfer/vars.lesspackages/theme/src/wizard/vars.lesspackages/theme/src/tabs/vars.lesspackages/theme/src/time-range/vars.lesspackages/theme/src/time-panel/vars.lesspackages/theme/src/dropdown-menu/vars.lesspackages/theme/src/date-panel/vars.lesspackages/theme/src/dialog-select/vars.lesspackages/theme/src/cascader/vars.lesspackages/theme/src/cascader-panel/vars.lesspackages/theme/src/autocomplete/vars.less
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify border radius fallback value consistency
The change from --tv-border-radius-default to --tv-border-radius-md has a potential issue:
- The fallback value is set to
6px, but according to the changes inold-theme.less,--tv-border-radius-mdshould be2px - This inconsistency could lead to different border radius values depending on whether the CSS variable is defined
Additionally, since the PR aims to adapt to an "old specification", please verify if this border radius change aligns with that objective.
Let's check the border radius definitions across theme files:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for border radius variable definitions and usage
# to verify consistency across the theme
echo "Checking border radius variable definitions:"
rg --type=less -A 1 "tv-border-radius-(md|default)"
echo "\nChecking SelectDropdown border radius usage:"
rg --type=less "SelectDropdown-border-radius"
Length of output: 8850
zzcr
changed the title
zzcr
changed the title
github-actions
bot
added
enhancement
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Style