fix(dropdown): [dropdown] fixed the data disorder issue caused by the composite scenario of two-layer components and self-invoking groups. #2553
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Warning Rate limit exceeded@zzcr has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 12 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/visible-arrow.spec.ts (1)
The adjustment of the arrow's top position from -8px to -7px appears to be an intentional refinement. The test maintains its purpose of verifying the arrow's visibility and positioning. Let's check if this change is documented or related to other dropdown positioning changes: ✅ Verification successfulThe -7px positioning appears to be the standard across the codebase The search results show that -7px is consistently used for arrow positioning across multiple components in the theme files (base/reset.less, upload-list, grid/tooltip). This change in the test from -8px to -7px aligns with the standard positioning used throughout the codebase, making it a correct adjustment to maintain consistency.
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for related arrow positioning changes in documentation and component files
# Check for any documentation updates regarding arrow positioning
rg -l "arrow.*position|popper.*arrow" --type md
# Look for related changes in dropdown component files
rg -l "popper__arrow.*top:-\d+px" --type vue --type css
Length of output: 135 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for arrow positioning in style-related files with broader file extensions
rg -l "popper.*arrow.*top:\s*-\d+px" --type css --type scss --type less --type ts --type js
# Search for arrow-related changes in documentation
rg -l "arrow.*position|popper.*arrow" --type md --type mdx
# Search for arrow-related class definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ { $$$ .popper__arrow { $$$ top: $_; $$$ } $$$ }'
# Look for specific arrow positioning values
rg "top:\s*-[78]px" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 2685 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
[e2e-test-warn] The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug". Please make sure you've read our contributing guide |
zzcr
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/vue/src/dropdown-item/src/pc.vue (1)
Line range hint
1-116: Consider architectural improvements for better maintainability.
The component has a TODO comment about inconsistent class naming (
tiny-dropdown-menu__item). This should be addressed in a separate ticket for consistent BEM naming.Consider splitting the component into:
- A presentational component handling the UI
- A container component managing the business logic
- A renderless component (already exists) for reusable logic
This separation would make the component more maintainable and testable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/vue/src/dropdown-item/src/pc.vue(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/vue/src/dropdown-item/src/pc.vue (1)
114-115: Improve documentation and verify nested component behavior.
-
The comment should provide more context about the data inconsistency issue:
- What specific scenario causes the issue?
- How does this fix resolve it?
- Are there any side effects to consider?
-
Consider keeping consistent naming between prop and setup parameter:
-return setup({ props, context, renderless, api, mono: props.isMono }) as unknown as IDropdownItemApi
+return setup({ props, context, renderless, api, isMono: props.isMono }) as unknown as IDropdownItemApiLet's verify the nested component behavior:
| :icon="item.icon" | ||
| :is-mono="true" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider binding to parent's isMono prop instead of hardcoding.
The hardcoded true value for :is-mono will force all nested items into mono mode, regardless of the parent's setting. Consider binding to the parent's prop value:
-:is-mono="true"
+:is-mono="isMono"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| :is-mono="true" | |
| :is-mono="isMono" |
| 'effect', | ||
| 'isMono' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add proper prop definitions with types and documentation.
The props should be properly defined with types, defaults, and documentation to improve maintainability and developer experience.
-'effect',
-'isMono'
+'effect': {
+ type: String,
+ default: 'dark',
+ validator: (value: string) => ['dark', 'light'].includes(value),
+ description: 'Controls the tooltip theme effect'
+},
+'isMono': {
+ type: Boolean,
+ default: false,
+ description: 'Controls the mono mode behavior for nested dropdown items'
+}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/vue/src/dropdown-item/src/pc.vue(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/vue/src/dropdown-item/src/pc.vue (1)
114-115: LGTM: Setup function changes look good.
The comment clearly explains the purpose of passing mono to the setup context - fixing data disorder in two-layer components with self-invoking groups. The implementation correctly passes the isMono prop value.
| @@ -56,7 +56,9 @@ | |||
| :key="index" | |||
| :label="item[state.textField]" | |||
| :item-data="item" | |||
| :_constants="_constants" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Define the _constants prop in props array.
The _constants prop is being used in the template but is not defined in the component's props array. This could lead to Vue warnings and potential runtime issues.
Add the prop definition:
props: [
...props,
+ '_constants',
'disabled',
// ... other props
],Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
MomoPoppy
changed the title
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
isMonofor enhanced configurability of the dropdown item component.Bug Fixes
Improvements
effectprop while ensuring its functionality remains intact.isMonoprop.