feat(milestone): [milestone] Adapting to the Default Theme #2559
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the CSS styles and variables for the milestone theme. Key changes include the adjustment of positioning and sizing properties for several classes in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/theme/src/milestone/vars.less (1)
21-21: Consider documenting the calculation rationale.The calculation
calc(var(--tv-size-base, 4px) * 8)would benefit from a comment explaining why 8 was chosen as the multiplier for the base size.// 图标节点宽度 - --tv-Milestone-node-size: calc(var(--tv-size-base, 4px) * 8); + // 32px (8 * 4px base) provides optimal visibility while maintaining proportions with other elements + --tv-Milestone-node-size: calc(var(--tv-size-base, 4px) * 8);packages/theme/src/milestone/index.less (2)
96-99: Consider using CSS variables for magic numbersThe positioning values (24px, -16px, 48px) should be defined as theme variables for better maintainability and consistency.
Consider refactoring to:
- left: calc(50% + 24px); - top: -16px; - width: calc(100% - 48px); + left: calc(50% + var(--tv-Milestone-line-offset)); + top: var(--tv-Milestone-line-top-offset); + width: calc(100% - var(--tv-Milestone-line-width-reduction));
Line range hint
59-189: Consider comprehensive theme variable standardizationWhile the changes improve theme adaptation, there's an opportunity to further enhance maintainability:
- Standardize all positioning values as theme variables
- Document the relationships between different component measurements
- Consider adding responsive breakpoints for better mobile support
Consider creating a comprehensive theme configuration document that explains the relationships between different measurements and their impact on the component's layout.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/theme/src/milestone/index.less(3 hunks)packages/theme/src/milestone/vars.less(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/theme/src/milestone/vars.less (1)
21-21: Verify the impact of consolidated node sizing.
The consolidation of separate width/height variables into a single --tv-Milestone-node-size variable is a good practice for maintaining consistency. However, we should verify that this change doesn't affect existing layouts.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the milestone component's styling to understand the full impact.
The consolidation of node sizing variables is safe and properly implemented.
The verification shows that:
- The new
--tv-Milestone-node-sizevariable is consistently used for width, height, and line-height in the milestone component - The only remaining reference to the old variable pattern is
--tv-Milestone-line-height, which is a separate styling concern for the connector line - All other size-related properties in the component are properly using the new consolidated variable or other well-defined variables
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any existing usages of the removed variables to ensure they're properly updated
rg --type=less "tv-Milestone-(icon|line)-(width|height|left|top)"
Length of output: 250
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the milestone component's styling implementation
rg --type=less -A 5 "tv-Milestone" packages/theme/src/milestone/
Length of output: 10675
packages/theme/src/milestone/index.less (2)
59-63: Verify vertical alignment with top: 0px
The change to top: 0px might affect the vertical alignment of icons relative to other milestone elements. Please ensure this aligns correctly with the line and doesn't create any visual gaps or overlaps.
Consider using CSS Grid or Flexbox for more robust alignment control, as absolute positioning can be fragile when components need to be responsive.
181-181: Verify UI changes impact on user experience
Two significant visual changes have been made:
- Removing the flag line's left margin might affect its alignment with the milestone
- Hiding the dot element removes a visual indicator
Please ensure these changes align with the design requirements and don't impact user experience negatively.
Consider using CSS classes for show/hide behavior instead of hard-coding display:none, allowing for more flexible state management.
Also applies to: 189-189
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores