add nodelifecycle controller

[rambohe-ch]

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment only one /kind <> line, hit enter to put that in a new line, and remove leading whitespace from that line:
/kind bug
/kind documentation
/kind enhancement
/kind good-first-issue
/kind feature
/kind question
/kind design
/sig ai
/sig iot
/sig network
/sig storage

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

As we discussed in the community meeting, nodelifecycle controller will be managed in yurt-manager controller and disabled in kube-controller-manager in order to manage pods eviction easily.

and the following two features are included in this pr:

1. add nodelifecycle controller
2. don't mark pods not ready when node has pod binding annotation

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

other Note

[JameKeal]

Hi rambohe-ch, I review this code for a long time, it seems that have no problems, but for insurance reasons, shall we organize a code review meeting, from you to show us the detail of the code, it can improve the quality of code.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1746 (83263d4) into master (7c1198a) will increase coverage by 1.35%.
The diff coverage is 67.49%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1746      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   50.80%   52.15%   +1.35%     
==========================================
  Files         165      172       +7     
  Lines       19258    20876    +1618     
==========================================
+ Hits         9784    10888    +1104     
- Misses       8555     9025     +470     
- Partials      919      963      +44     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	52.15% <67.49%> (+1.35%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
pkg/util/taints/taints.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...kg/yurtmanager/controller/nodelifecycle/metrics.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pkg/yurtmanager/webhook/node/v1/node_handler.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...r/controller/csrapprover/csrapprover_controller.go	26.84% <0.00%> (ø)
.../daemonpodupdater/daemon_pod_updater_controller.go	29.80% <0.00%> (ø)
...manager/controller/nodepool/nodepool_controller.go	46.73% <0.00%> (ø)
...yurtmanager/controller/raven/dns/dns_controller.go	30.06% <0.00%> (ø)
...rnalservice/gateway_internal_service_controller.go	48.14% <0.00%> (ø)
...r/raven/gatewaypickup/gateway_pickup_controller.go	24.89% <0.00%> (ø)
...publicservice/gateway_public_service_controller.go	39.14% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 13 more

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

[rambohe-ch]

Hi rambohe-ch, I review this code for a long time, it seems that have no problems, but for insurance reasons, shall we organize a code review meeting, from you to show us the detail of the code, it can improve the quality of code.

@JameKeal Thanks for your suggestion. I think maybe it's a good idea to introduce this pull request in a community meeting.

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
30 Code Smells

No Coverage information
1.1% Duplication

[YTGhost]

/lgtm

[openyurt-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rambohe-ch, YTGhost

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [rambohe-ch]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[JameKeal]

/lgtm

[openyurt-bot]

@JameKeal: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[rambohe-ch]

Fixes #1713

[crazytaxii]

Should we disable node lifecycle controller in kube-controller-manager in OpenYurt v1.4？

[rambohe-ch]

Should we disable node lifecycle controller in kube-controller-manager in OpenYurt v1.4？

@crazytaxii yes, we need to disable the nodelifecycle controller in kube-controller-manager component. and the tip has been added in the OpenYurt setup tutorial. the link is here: https://openyurt.io/docs/installation/manually-setup#2-prerequisites-for-installing-the-openyurt-control-plane

To adapt to the complex network scenarios at the edge, we need to disable the original node lifecycle management controller of the k8s. For details, see Kube-Controller-Manager Installation Configuration Adjustments.

[jeffrey4l]

based on our test, seems there is no need to remove the node lifecycle controller from kube-controller-manager.
But how it works ? @rambohe-ch