Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Linux 6.5 fix: iter_iov() function now used to get old iov member #15100

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ckane
Copy link
Contributor

@ckane ckane commented Jul 23, 2023

The iov_iter->iov member is now iov_iter->__iov and must be accessed via the accessor function iter_iov().

Motivation and Context

The iov member of struct iov_iter has been renamed to __iov and is now supposed to be accessed via a new function named iter_iov().

Description

Add a new autoconf test for the existence of iter_iov() and then modify the use in module/os/linux/zfs/zpl_file.c to get this member by calling iter_iov(to) if that function is detected by configure, otherwise rely on the original behavior.

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested to not regress on 6.4.4. The module was build-tested against 6.5rc1, but not able to fully test due to other blocking changes pending resolution.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Library ABI change (libzfs, libzfs_core, libnvpair, libuutil and libzfsbootenv)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

@behlendorf behlendorf added the Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing label Jul 24, 2023
@ckane ckane force-pushed the iter_iov-fix branch 3 times, most recently from ddda20c to cc19812 Compare July 30, 2023 22:35
@behlendorf behlendorf added Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested) and removed Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing labels Jul 31, 2023
The iov_iter->iov member is now iov_iter->__iov and must be accessed via
the accessor function iter_iov(). Create a wrapper that is conditionally
compiled to use the access method appropriate for the target kernel
version.

Signed-off-by: Coleman Kane <ckane@colemankane.org>
An iov_iter_type() function to access the "type" member of the struct
iov_iter was added at one point. Move the conditional logic to decide
which method to use for accessing it into a macro and simplify the
zpl_uio_init code.

Signed-off-by: Coleman Kane <ckane@colemankane.org>
@behlendorf behlendorf closed this in 325505e Aug 1, 2023
behlendorf pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2023
An iov_iter_type() function to access the "type" member of the struct
iov_iter was added at one point. Move the conditional logic to decide
which method to use for accessing it into a macro and simplify the
zpl_uio_init code.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Coleman Kane <ckane@colemankane.org>
Closes #15100
behlendorf pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2023
The iov_iter->iov member is now iov_iter->__iov and must be accessed via
the accessor function iter_iov(). Create a wrapper that is conditionally
compiled to use the access method appropriate for the target kernel
version.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Coleman Kane <ckane@colemankane.org>
Closes #15100
behlendorf pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2023
An iov_iter_type() function to access the "type" member of the struct
iov_iter was added at one point. Move the conditional logic to decide
which method to use for accessing it into a macro and simplify the
zpl_uio_init code.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Coleman Kane <ckane@colemankane.org>
Closes #15100
tonyhutter pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
The iov_iter->iov member is now iov_iter->__iov and must be accessed via
the accessor function iter_iov(). Create a wrapper that is conditionally
compiled to use the access method appropriate for the target kernel
version.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Coleman Kane <ckane@colemankane.org>
Closes #15100
tonyhutter pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
An iov_iter_type() function to access the "type" member of the struct
iov_iter was added at one point. Move the conditional logic to decide
which method to use for accessing it into a macro and simplify the
zpl_uio_init code.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Coleman Kane <ckane@colemankane.org>
Closes #15100
lundman pushed a commit to openzfsonwindows/openzfs that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2023
The iov_iter->iov member is now iov_iter->__iov and must be accessed via
the accessor function iter_iov(). Create a wrapper that is conditionally
compiled to use the access method appropriate for the target kernel
version.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Coleman Kane <ckane@colemankane.org>
Closes openzfs#15100
lundman pushed a commit to openzfsonwindows/openzfs that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2023
An iov_iter_type() function to access the "type" member of the struct
iov_iter was added at one point. Move the conditional logic to decide
which method to use for accessing it into a macro and simplify the
zpl_uio_init code.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Coleman Kane <ckane@colemankane.org>
Closes openzfs#15100
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants