Fix device expansion when VM is powered off #9111
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Since this code takes different code paths for device expansion depending on if For example, I create two pools: Then I did the following:
Here we can see the size of the pools still match: Additionally, I then destroyed the two pools, and then recreated them with |
|
Also worth noting, this is a port of this delphix-os commit (originally authored by @grwilson) which never made it upstream into illumos; we've been running with the delphix-os commit since at least August 2014. |
don-brady
approved these changes
Aug 1, 2019
grwilson
approved these changes
Aug 2, 2019
|
@behlendorf any thoughts on this one? |
behlendorf
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Functionally this looks good to me. Just one question, and a small nit below. You mentioned that the label is getting rewritten with the correct values which is what's causing this issue. Do you know exactly what in your environment is doing this when powering off/on?
lib/libefi/rdwr_efi.c
Outdated
| } | ||
| } | ||
| VERIFY3U(data_start + data_size, ==, resv_start); | ||
| VERIFY3U(limit, >=, resv_start); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit: Technically I believe we should be using verify() here for portability since this is built solely as a library. That said, returning VT_EINVAL as an error would probably be better since we are working with values read from disk and the vtoc could be damaged/incorrect. It would be better to handle the error rather than crash.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can try to make this change if you'd like it in this PR..
I don't know for sure, but my guess is this is done by the ESX hypervisor. |
|
@behlendorf in illumos we had seen that ESX was updating the label during this type of expansion. It caught us by surprise that it did that. |
behlendorf
added
Status: Accepted
When running on an ESXi based VM, I've found that "zpool online -e" will
not expand the zpool, if the disk was expanded in ESXi while the VM was
powered off.
For example, take the following scenario:
1. VM running on top of VMware ESXi
2. ZFS pool created with a given device "sda" of size 8GB
3. VM powered off
4. Device "sda" size expanded to 16GB
5. VM powered on
6. "zpool online -e" used on device "sda"
In this situation, after (2) the zpool will be roughly 8GB in size.
After (6), the expectation is the zpool's size will expand to roughly
16GB in size; i.e. expand to the new size of the "sda" device.
Unfortuantely, I've seen that after (6), the zpool size does not change.
What's happening is after (5), the EFI label of the "sda" device will be
such that fields "efi_last_u_lba", "efi_last_lba", and "efi_altern_lba"
all reflect the new size of the disk; i.e. "33554398", "33554431", and
"33554431" respectively.
Thus, the check that we perform in "efi_use_whole_disk":
if ((efi_label->efi_altern_lba == 1) || (efi_label->efi_altern_lba
>= efi_label->efi_last_lba)) {
This will return true, and then we return from the function without
having expanded the size of the zpool/device.
In contrast, if we remove steps (3) and (5) in the sequence above, i.e.
the device is expanded while the VM is powered on, things change. In
that case, the fields "efi_last_u_lba" and "efi_altern_lba" do not
change (i.e. they still reflect the old 8GB device size), but the
"efi_last_lba" field does change (i.e. it now reflects the new 16GB
device size). Thus, when we evaluate the same conditional in
"efi_use_whole_disk", it'll return false, so the zpool is expanded.
Taking all of this into account, this PR updates "efi_use_whole_disk" to
properly expand the zpool when the underlying disk is expanded while the
VM is powered off.
Signed-off-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
|
@behlendorf I've squashed this to a single commit (with your feedback) and rebased onto master. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #9111 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 79.11% 79.03% -0.09%
==========================================
Files 400 400
Lines 121790 121806 +16
==========================================
- Hits 96357 96265 -92
- Misses 25433 25541 +108
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
tonyhutter
pushed a commit
to tonyhutter/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 24, 2019
When running on an ESXi based VM, I've found that "zpool online -e" will
not expand the zpool, if the disk was expanded in ESXi while the VM was
powered off.
For example, take the following scenario:
1. VM running on top of VMware ESXi
2. ZFS pool created with a given device "sda" of size 8GB
3. VM powered off
4. Device "sda" size expanded to 16GB
5. VM powered on
6. "zpool online -e" used on device "sda"
In this situation, after (2) the zpool will be roughly 8GB in size.
After (6), the expectation is the zpool's size will expand to roughly
16GB in size; i.e. expand to the new size of the "sda" device.
Unfortunately, I've seen that after (6), the zpool size does not change.
What's happening is after (5), the EFI label of the "sda" device will be
such that fields "efi_last_u_lba", "efi_last_lba", and "efi_altern_lba"
all reflect the new size of the disk; i.e. "33554398", "33554431", and
"33554431" respectively.
Thus, the check that we perform in "efi_use_whole_disk":
if ((efi_label->efi_altern_lba == 1) || (efi_label->efi_altern_lba
>= efi_label->efi_last_lba)) {
This will return true, and then we return from the function without
having expanded the size of the zpool/device.
In contrast, if we remove steps (3) and (5) in the sequence above, i.e.
the device is expanded while the VM is powered on, things change. In
that case, the fields "efi_last_u_lba" and "efi_altern_lba" do not
change (i.e. they still reflect the old 8GB device size), but the
"efi_last_lba" field does change (i.e. it now reflects the new 16GB
device size). Thus, when we evaluate the same conditional in
"efi_use_whole_disk", it'll return false, so the zpool is expanded.
Taking all of this into account, this PR updates "efi_use_whole_disk" to
properly expand the zpool when the underlying disk is expanded while the
VM is powered off.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: George Wilson <gwilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Closes openzfs#9111
tonyhutter
pushed a commit
to tonyhutter/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 27, 2019
When running on an ESXi based VM, I've found that "zpool online -e" will
not expand the zpool, if the disk was expanded in ESXi while the VM was
powered off.
For example, take the following scenario:
1. VM running on top of VMware ESXi
2. ZFS pool created with a given device "sda" of size 8GB
3. VM powered off
4. Device "sda" size expanded to 16GB
5. VM powered on
6. "zpool online -e" used on device "sda"
In this situation, after (2) the zpool will be roughly 8GB in size.
After (6), the expectation is the zpool's size will expand to roughly
16GB in size; i.e. expand to the new size of the "sda" device.
Unfortunately, I've seen that after (6), the zpool size does not change.
What's happening is after (5), the EFI label of the "sda" device will be
such that fields "efi_last_u_lba", "efi_last_lba", and "efi_altern_lba"
all reflect the new size of the disk; i.e. "33554398", "33554431", and
"33554431" respectively.
Thus, the check that we perform in "efi_use_whole_disk":
if ((efi_label->efi_altern_lba == 1) || (efi_label->efi_altern_lba
>= efi_label->efi_last_lba)) {
This will return true, and then we return from the function without
having expanded the size of the zpool/device.
In contrast, if we remove steps (3) and (5) in the sequence above, i.e.
the device is expanded while the VM is powered on, things change. In
that case, the fields "efi_last_u_lba" and "efi_altern_lba" do not
change (i.e. they still reflect the old 8GB device size), but the
"efi_last_lba" field does change (i.e. it now reflects the new 16GB
device size). Thus, when we evaluate the same conditional in
"efi_use_whole_disk", it'll return false, so the zpool is expanded.
Taking all of this into account, this PR updates "efi_use_whole_disk" to
properly expand the zpool when the underlying disk is expanded while the
VM is powered off.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: George Wilson <gwilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Closes openzfs#9111
tonyhutter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2020
When running on an ESXi based VM, I've found that "zpool online -e" will
not expand the zpool, if the disk was expanded in ESXi while the VM was
powered off.
For example, take the following scenario:
1. VM running on top of VMware ESXi
2. ZFS pool created with a given device "sda" of size 8GB
3. VM powered off
4. Device "sda" size expanded to 16GB
5. VM powered on
6. "zpool online -e" used on device "sda"
In this situation, after (2) the zpool will be roughly 8GB in size.
After (6), the expectation is the zpool's size will expand to roughly
16GB in size; i.e. expand to the new size of the "sda" device.
Unfortunately, I've seen that after (6), the zpool size does not change.
What's happening is after (5), the EFI label of the "sda" device will be
such that fields "efi_last_u_lba", "efi_last_lba", and "efi_altern_lba"
all reflect the new size of the disk; i.e. "33554398", "33554431", and
"33554431" respectively.
Thus, the check that we perform in "efi_use_whole_disk":
if ((efi_label->efi_altern_lba == 1) || (efi_label->efi_altern_lba
>= efi_label->efi_last_lba)) {
This will return true, and then we return from the function without
having expanded the size of the zpool/device.
In contrast, if we remove steps (3) and (5) in the sequence above, i.e.
the device is expanded while the VM is powered on, things change. In
that case, the fields "efi_last_u_lba" and "efi_altern_lba" do not
change (i.e. they still reflect the old 8GB device size), but the
"efi_last_lba" field does change (i.e. it now reflects the new 16GB
device size). Thus, when we evaluate the same conditional in
"efi_use_whole_disk", it'll return false, so the zpool is expanded.
Taking all of this into account, this PR updates "efi_use_whole_disk" to
properly expand the zpool when the underlying disk is expanded while the
VM is powered off.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: George Wilson <gwilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Closes #9111
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation and Context
When running on an ESXi based VM, I've found that "zpool online -e" will
not expand the zpool, if the disk was expanded in ESXi while the VM was
powered off.
For example, take the following scenario:
In this situation, after (2) the zpool will be roughly 8GB in size.
After (6), the expectation is the zpool's size will expand to roughly
16GB in size; i.e. expand to the new size of the "sda" device.
Unfortuantely, I've seen that after (6), the zpool size does not change.
What's happening is after (5), the EFI label of the "sda" device will be
such that fields "efi_last_u_lba", "efi_last_lba", and "efi_altern_lba"
all reflect the new size of the disk; i.e. "33554398", "33554431", and
"33554431" respectively.
Thus, the check that we perform in "efi_use_whole_disk":
This will return true, and then we return from the function without
having expanded the size of the zpool/device.
In contrast, if we remove steps (3) and (5) in the sequence above, i.e.
the device is expanded while the VM is powered on, things change. In
that case, the fields "efi_last_u_lba" and "efi_altern_lba" do not
change (i.e. they still reflect the old 8GB device size), but the
"efi_last_lba" field does change (i.e. it now reflects the new 16GB
device size). Thus, when we evaluate the same conditional in
"efi_use_whole_disk", it'll return false, so the zpool is expanded.
Taking all of this into account, this PR updates "efi_use_whole_disk" to
properly expand the zpool when the underlying disk is expanded while the
VM is powered off.
Signed-off-by: Prakash Surya prakash.surya@delphix.com
How Has This Been Tested?
Types of changes
Checklist:
Signed-off-by.