Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(cleanup) Kustomization #183

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2023

Conversation

anik120
Copy link
Collaborator

@anik120 anik120 commented Sep 28, 2023

Closes #155, #160

@anik120 anik120 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 28, 2023 14:20
@anik120 anik120 self-assigned this Sep 28, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 28, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (7f903c6) 87.02% compared to head (32bd184) 87.02%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #183   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.02%   87.02%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         131      131           
=======================================
  Hits          114      114           
  Misses         10       10           
  Partials        7        7           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -15,5 +15,4 @@ resources:
- ../crd
- ../rbac
- ../manager
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like there is also a prometheus directory that is unused. We do expose metrics that can be monitored via prometheus, but it seems like we haven't ever shipped the manifests with the ServiceMonitor definition. Should we remove this and instead add some documentation with an example ServiceMonitor that can be applied for grabbing metrics?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that's a good idea +1. We should probably do the removal and subsequent documentation in a separate, single PR though.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would vote to remove it now if it is extraneous. We can add it back (or examples) if/when someone asks for it.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. Removed the prometheus folder.

@joelanford
Copy link
Member

joelanford commented Sep 28, 2023

@anik120 Can you also remove or edit some or all of the app.kubernetes.io-prefixed labels? The values don't seem to quite align to the docs.

I'd reduce to this for now:

    app.kubernetes.io/name: catalogd
    app.kubernetes.io/part-of: olm

Closes operator-framework#155, operator-framework#160

Signed-off-by: Anik Bhattacharjee <anbhatta@redhat.com>
@anik120
Copy link
Collaborator Author

anik120 commented Sep 29, 2023

@anik120 Can you also remove or edit some or all of the app.kubernetes.io-prefixed labels? The values don't seem to quite align to the docs.

I'd reduce to this for now:

    app.kubernetes.io/name: catalogd
    app.kubernetes.io/part-of: olm

@joelanford done

@joelanford joelanford added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 2, 2023
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit 8a90d8d Oct 2, 2023
10 checks passed
@anik120 anik120 mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cleanup config/default/manager_auth_proxy_patch.yaml
3 participants