Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 make garbage collection a runnable #231

Conversation

everettraven
Copy link
Collaborator

and add it to the controller manager. Make it log errors instead of exiting. This prevents crashlooping when there are errors in the garbage collection process.

@everettraven everettraven requested a review from a team as a code owner February 19, 2024 19:46
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 21 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (f549f54) 39.83% compared to head (afacc2d) 49.22%.

Files Patch % Lines
internal/garbagecollection/garbage_collector.go 36.36% 18 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #231      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   39.83%   49.22%   +9.39%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines         482      388      -94     
==========================================
- Hits          192      191       -1     
+ Misses        269      176      -93     
  Partials       21       21              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

and add it to the controller manager. Make it log errors instead of
exiting. This prevents crashlooping when there are errors in the
garbage collection process.

Signed-off-by: everettraven <everettraven@gmail.com>
@everettraven everettraven force-pushed the bugfix/garbage-collection-crashloop branch from 475f778 to afacc2d Compare February 19, 2024 20:10
@grokspawn
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 19, 2024
@grokspawn grokspawn added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 19, 2024
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit 0d305bd Feb 19, 2024
12 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants