Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#81 Updated README #93

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 26, 2023

Conversation

michaelryanpeter
Copy link
Contributor

Issue: #81

Update the catalogd README to reflect the current state of the project and its place in the OLM v1 project.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 9, 2023
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@michaelryanpeter michaelryanpeter force-pushed the #81-update-readme branch 4 times, most recently from 7a0a5f8 to 1be4af0 Compare June 9, 2023 20:41
Copy link
Collaborator

@anik120 anik120 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for doing this @michaelryanpeter! 🙏🏽

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@michaelryanpeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@anik120 Would you PTAL at the updates and let know if they address your concerns?

Copy link
Collaborator

@anik120 anik120 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking GREAT! Other than the missing example outputs:

/lgtm

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 22, 2023
@anik120
Copy link
Collaborator

anik120 commented Jun 22, 2023

Also the DCO check is failing (if you click on Details it has information about what's needed for this pass to check, which is essentially a sign off on the commit/s)

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 23, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 23, 2023

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@michaelryanpeter michaelryanpeter changed the title [WIP] #81 Updated README #81 Updated README Jun 23, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 23, 2023
@michaelryanpeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

michaelryanpeter commented Jun 23, 2023

@anik120 and @everettraven: I got kind working, added example outputs, and squashed and signed my commit. Do I need to request more reviews in Slack?

@michaelryanpeter michaelryanpeter force-pushed the #81-update-readme branch 2 times, most recently from e8b1577 to ef5090d Compare June 23, 2023 19:00
Copy link
Collaborator

@everettraven everettraven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall looks great!

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@everettraven
Copy link
Collaborator

Do I need to request more reviews in Slack?

@michaelryanpeter if you want some extra eyes it doesn't hurt to throw it in the #olm-dev channel in the Kubernetes slack

Copy link
Collaborator

@anik120 anik120 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

We can get this merged after the rebase

Issue: operator-framework#81

Signed-off-by: Michael Ryan Peter <mipeter@redhat.com>

Fix output examples

Signed-off-by: Michael Ryan Peter <mipeter@redhat.com>
@anik120 anik120 merged commit d5ce2b1 into operator-framework:main Jun 26, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants