Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⚠️ Remove getter methods from constraints #166

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2023

Conversation

m1kola
Copy link
Member

@m1kola m1kola commented Dec 4, 2023

We export fields from constraints instead

Closes #154

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 4, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 23 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (75c37b5) 63.36% compared to head (682ee65) 63.77%.

Files Patch % Lines
pkg/deppy/constraint/constraint.go 0.00% 23 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #166      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   63.36%   63.77%   +0.41%     
==========================================
  Files          10       10              
  Lines         464      461       -3     
==========================================
  Hits          294      294              
+ Misses        154      151       -3     
  Partials       16       16              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ncdc
Copy link
Member

ncdc commented Dec 4, 2023

LGTM when ready!

We export fields from constraints instead

Signed-off-by: Mikalai Radchuk <mradchuk@redhat.com>
@m1kola m1kola marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2023 15:24
@m1kola m1kola requested a review from a team as a code owner December 4, 2023 15:24
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 4, 2023
@m1kola
Copy link
Member Author

m1kola commented Dec 4, 2023

@ncdc rebased on top of main (no conflicts) and marked as ready. Please take another look.

@ncdc ncdc added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 4, 2023
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit ddd4744 Dec 4, 2023
6 of 7 checks passed
@m1kola m1kola changed the title Remove getter methods from constraints ⚠️ Remove getter methods from constraints Dec 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Breaking change: Remove getter methods on constraints and expose fields instead
2 participants