Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump k8s libs #416

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025
Merged

bump k8s libs #416

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.48%. Comparing base (08ab7fb) to head (60e7542).
Report is 67 commits behind head on main.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (08ab7fb) and HEAD (60e7542). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (08ab7fb) HEAD (60e7542)
2 1
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #416      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.06%   78.48%   -6.59%     
==========================================
  Files          19       31      +12     
  Lines        1346     2477    +1131     
==========================================
+ Hits         1145     1944     +799     
- Misses        125      444     +319     
- Partials       76       89      +13     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@perdasilva perdasilva marked this pull request as draft January 13, 2025 10:17
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 13, 2025
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold until controller-runtime is updated to 0.32

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 13, 2025
@perdasilva perdasilva marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2025 14:07
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 13, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from varshaprasad96 January 13, 2025 14:07
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 14, 2025
@perdasilva perdasilva enabled auto-merge January 14, 2025 13:30
@perdasilva perdasilva added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 14, 2025
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit c923823 Jan 14, 2025
6 checks passed
@perdasilva perdasilva deleted the bump/k8s branch January 14, 2025 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/deps area/sdk lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants