-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Josdk 1.9.1 #2
Josdk 1.9.1 #2
Conversation
daniellavoie
commented
Jun 5, 2021
- Upgrades to josdk 1.9.0
- Cleanup dependency management and duplicate properties in poms
- Moved starter-test into the project to fix circular dependencies
- Upgrade fabric8 to 5.4.1 to support TLSv1 deprecation from latest JDKs
- Added maven wrapper
* Upgrades to josdk 1.9.0 * Cleanup dependency management and duplicate properties in poms * Moved starter-test into the project to fix circular dependencies Fixes operator-framework#1
</parent> | ||
|
||
<name>Java Operator SDK Spring Boot Starter Test</name> | ||
<description>Spring Boot starter for the Java Operator SDK</description> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you need to adjust the description here to mention that this is the test starter…
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes indeed!
@@ -61,25 +60,23 @@ public boolean checkCRDAndValidateLocalModel() { | |||
@ConditionalOnMissingBean(Operator.class) | |||
public Operator operator( | |||
KubernetesClient kubernetesClient, | |||
List<ResourceController<?>> resourceControllers, | |||
Optional<ObjectMapper> objectMapper) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why did you remove the option to configure the ObjectMapper?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The ObjectMapper constructor option was removed with 1.9.0. I may have overlooked potential other new constructor options.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, yes, sorry! The ObjectMapper
is now configured via the ConfigurationService
.
Thank you for taking on that effort! I assume we will need to delete the |
Yes, |
Co-authored-by: Chris Laprun <metacosm@users.noreply.github.com>
Hi @daniellavoie, any chance we could complete this work and get it merged soon? |
<surefire.version>3.0.0-M5</surefire.version> | ||
<fabric8-client.version>5.4.1</fabric8-client.version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could be updated to 5.6.0
@daniellavoie any chances to merge this PR? |