Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ extension: use union discriminator pattern in source specification #645

Merged

Conversation

joelanford
Copy link
Member

Description

Closes #636

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
@joelanford joelanford requested a review from a team as a code owner February 21, 2024 22:30
Copy link
Contributor

@tmshort tmshort left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 22, 2024
@tmshort tmshort added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 22, 2024
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit cc1ad3e Feb 22, 2024
13 checks passed
@joelanford joelanford changed the title ✨ extension: use union discriminator patther in source specification ✨ extension: use union discriminator pattern in source specification Feb 22, 2024
@joelanford
Copy link
Member Author

I was playing a bit more with this this morning based on some of the suggestions here: kubernetes-sigs/controller-tools#298

If/when we add another union member, it might make sense to refer back to those suggestions.

@joelanford joelanford deleted the ext-source-union-discrim branch February 22, 2024 14:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Follow-up(add extension API): Use union discriminator pattern for spec.source
3 participants