Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Move the e2e into the operator-controler-system ns #927

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 12, 2024

Conversation

tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

@tmshort tmshort commented Jun 12, 2024

To allow access to the docker-registry certificate, move the e2e resources into the same namespace as the operator-controller-system namespace.

Description

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

To allow access to the docker-registry certificate, move the e2e
resources into the same namespace as the operator-controller-system
namespace.

Signed-off-by: Todd Short <tshort@redhat.com>
@tmshort tmshort requested a review from a team as a code owner June 12, 2024 15:12
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 12, 2024

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit dfd8786
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/olmv1/deploys/6669bae440e2bf0008f4803b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-927--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.38%. Comparing base (66a063b) to head (dfd8786).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #927   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.38%   77.38%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        1163     1163           
=======================================
  Hits          900      900           
  Misses        183      183           
  Partials       80       80           
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 57.17% <ø> (ø)
unit 50.98% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 12, 2024
@tmshort tmshort added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit aa48e70 Jun 12, 2024
16 checks passed
@tmshort tmshort deleted the move-e2e branch June 12, 2024 19:47
tmshort added a commit to tmshort/operator-controller that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
…framework#927)"

This ends up overwriting the security policy of the operator-controller-system
namespace, which really isn't something we want to do in a valid e2e test.

Many of the e2e components need to run as root in order to do the things
they need to do.

This reverts commit aa48e70.
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
)

This ends up overwriting the security policy of the operator-controller-system
namespace, which really isn't something we want to do in a valid e2e test.

Many of the e2e components need to run as root in order to do the things
they need to do.

This reverts commit aa48e70.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants