-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 546
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1805412: Support multiple APIServices on a single deployment #1339
Bug 1805412: Support multiple APIServices on a single deployment #1339
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a small comment and tests. Otherwise looks good to me.
/hold |
/bugzilla refresh |
@awgreene: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1805412, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@awgreene: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1805412, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
lgtm except for the format and the conflicts. Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. nit: Not sure what the norm is but a single line comment for each of the newly introduced func() for easier code readability ?
/retest
Trying one more time... |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: awgreene, ecordell, exdx The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
/test e2e-gcp-upgrade |
1 similar comment
/test e2e-gcp-upgrade |
/retest |
6 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
/unhold |
/retest |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
3 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
@awgreene: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1805412 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.4 |
@ecordell: new pull request created: #1382 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
No description provided.